Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, 115 Shevlin Hall, 164 Pillsbury Dr. SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Mar;149(3):1685. doi: 10.1121/10.0003564.
The main goal of the present study was to assess the role of the fundamental frequency (F0) range on the clear-speech benefit. Conversational- and clear-speech sentences were recorded for four male speakers: the speakers' clear-speech productions had slower speaking rates, wider F0 range, more high-frequency energy, expanded vowel space, and higher vocal intensity level relative to their conversational-speech productions. To examine if F0 range contributes to the clear-speech benefit, the F0 range of clear-speech sentences was compressed to match that of the speakers' conversational-speech sentences. Fifteen listeners were presented with conversational, clear, and F0-compressed sentences in sustained speech-shaped noise. All talkers elicited substantial intelligibility benefits (keyword percent correct) from clear and F0-compressed speech when compared with conversational speech. There was no significant difference in performance between clear and F0-compressed speech. These results leave open the possibility that a clear-speech benefit could be a result of its F0 contours rather than its wide F0 range. Intelligibility predictions based on acoustic characteristics of clear speech, specifically high-frequency emphasis and pauses, accounted for either small or negligible amounts of the clear-speech benefit.
本研究的主要目的是评估基频(F0)范围对清晰语音增益的作用。对四位男性说话者的会话语音和清晰语音进行了录制:与会话语音相比,说话者的清晰语音具有更慢的说话速度、更宽的 F0 范围、更多的高频能量、扩展的元音空间和更高的嗓音强度。为了检验 F0 范围是否有助于清晰语音增益,我们将清晰语音句子的 F0 范围压缩到与说话者的会话语音句子相匹配。15 位听众在持续语音噪声中听到了会话语音、清晰语音和 F0 压缩语音。与会话语音相比,所有说话者的清晰语音和 F0 压缩语音都能显著提高可懂度(关键词正确百分比)。清晰语音和 F0 压缩语音之间的性能没有显著差异。这些结果表明,清晰语音增益可能是其 F0 轮廓的结果,而不是其宽的 F0 范围。基于清晰语音的声学特征(特别是高频强调和停顿)的可懂度预测,只能解释很小或可忽略不计的清晰语音增益。