Research Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 26;21(Suppl 1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03516-4.
Respectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) is an important component of high-quality care but progress is impeded by critical measurement gaps for women and newborns. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study was an observational study with mixed methods assessing measurement validity for coverage and quality of maternal and newborn indicators. This paper reports results regarding the measurement of respectful care for women and newborns.
At one EN-BIRTH study site in Pokhara, Nepal, we included additional questions during exit-survey interviews with women about their experiences (July 2017-July 2018). The questionnaire was based on seven mistreatment typologies: Physical; Sexual; or Verbal abuse; Stigma/discrimination; Failure to meet professional standards of care; Poor rapport between women and providers; and Health care denied due to inability to pay. We calculated associations between these typologies and potential determinants of health - ethnicity, age, sex, mode of birth - as possible predictors for reporting poor care.
Among 4296 women interviewed, none reported physical, sexual, or verbal abuse. 15.7% of women were dissatisfied with privacy, and 13.0% of women reported their birth experience did not meet their religious and cultural needs. In descriptive analysis, adjusted odds ratios and multivariate analysis showed primiparous women were less likely to report respectful care (β = 0.23, p-value < 0.0001). Women from Madeshi (a disadvantaged ethnic group) were more likely to report poor care (β = - 0.34; p-value 0.037) than women identifying as Chettri/Brahmin. Women who had caesarean section were less likely to report poor care during childbirth (β = - 0.42; p-value < 0.0001) than women with a vaginal birth. However, babies born by caesarean had a 98% decrease in the odds (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.01-0.05) of receiving skin-to-skin contact than those with vaginal births.
Measurement of respectful care at exit interview after hospital birth is challenging, and women generally reported 100% respectful care for themselves and their baby. Specific questions, with stratification by mode of birth, women's age and ethnicity, are important to identify those mistreated during care and to prioritise action. More research is needed to develop evidence-based measures to track experience of care, including zero separation for the mother-newborn pair, and to improve monitoring.
尊重孕产妇和新生儿护理(RMNC)是高质量护理的重要组成部分,但由于对妇女和新生儿的关键衡量差距,进展受到阻碍。在医院进行的每个新生儿出生指标研究跟踪(EN-BIRTH)研究是一项观察性研究,采用混合方法评估了孕产妇和新生儿指标的覆盖范围和质量的衡量有效性。本文报告了关于尊重妇女和新生儿护理的衡量结果。
在尼泊尔博克拉的一个 EN-BIRTH 研究点,我们在妇女的出院调查访谈中增加了一些关于她们经历的问题(2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 7 月)。该问卷基于七种虐待类型:身体虐待;性虐待;或言语虐待;污名/歧视;未能达到护理专业标准;妇女与提供者之间的关系不佳;以及因无力支付而拒绝医疗保健。我们计算了这些类型与健康的潜在决定因素之间的关联-种族、年龄、性别、分娩方式-作为报告不良护理的可能预测因素。
在接受采访的 4296 名妇女中,没有一人报告身体、性或言语虐待。15.7%的妇女对隐私不满意,13.0%的妇女表示她们的分娩经历不符合她们的宗教和文化需求。在描述性分析中,调整后的优势比和多变量分析表明,初产妇不太可能报告尊重护理(β=0.23,p 值<0.0001)。来自马德西(一个处于不利地位的族群)的妇女比切特里/婆罗门身份的妇女更有可能报告不良护理(β=-0.34;p 值=0.037)。接受剖宫产的妇女在分娩时不太可能报告不良护理(β=-0.42;p 值<0.0001),而阴道分娩的妇女则较少报告不良护理。然而,剖宫产出生的婴儿接受皮肤接触的几率降低了 98%(优势比 aOR=0.02,95%CI,0.01-0.05),而阴道分娩的婴儿则没有。
在医院分娩后的出院访谈中衡量尊重护理具有挑战性,一般来说,妇女报告自己和婴儿的护理 100%是尊重的。按分娩方式、妇女年龄和种族分层的具体问题,对于识别护理过程中受虐待的人并确定优先事项非常重要。需要进一步研究以制定循证措施来跟踪护理体验,包括母婴不分离,并加强监测。