Suppr超能文献

袋鼠式护理:EN-BIRTH 多国家验证研究。

Kangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute (IHI), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 26;21(Suppl 1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03423-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kangaroo mother care (KMC) reduces mortality among stable neonates ≤2000 g. Lack of data tracking coverage and quality of KMC in both surveys and routine information systems impedes scale-up. This paper evaluates KMC measurement as part of the Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study.

METHODS

The EN-BIRTH observational mixed-methods study was conducted in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal and Tanzania from 2017 to 2018. Clinical observers collected time-stamped data as gold standard for mother-baby pairs in KMC wards/corners. To assess accuracy, we compared routine register-recorded and women's exit survey-reported coverage to observed data, using different recommended denominator options (≤2000 g and ≤ 2499 g). We analysed gaps in quality of provision and experience of KMC. In the Tanzanian hospitals, we assessed daily skin-to-skin duration/dose and feeding frequency. Qualitative data were collected from health workers and data collectors regarding barriers and enablers to routine register design, filling and use.

RESULTS

Among 840 mother-baby pairs, compared to observed 100% coverage, both exit-survey reported (99.9%) and register-recorded coverage (92.9%) were highly valid measures with high sensitivity. KMC specific registers outperformed general registers. Enablers to register recording included perceptions of data usefulness, while barriers included duplication of data elements and overburdened health workers. Gaps in KMC quality were identified for position components including wearing a hat. In Temeke Tanzania, 10.6% of babies received daily KMC skin-to-skin duration/dose of ≥20 h and a further 75.3% received 12-19 h. Regular feeding ≥8 times/day was observed for 36.5% babies in Temeke Tanzania and 14.6% in Muhimbili Tanzania. Cup-feeding was the predominant assisted feeding method. Family support during admission was variable, grandmothers co-provided KMC more often in Bangladesh. No facility arrangements for other family members were reported by 45% of women at exit survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine hospital KMC register data have potential to track coverage from hospital KMC wards/corners. Women accurately reported KMC at exit survey and evaluation for population-based surveys could be considered. Measurement of content, quality and experience of KMC need consensus on definitions. Prioritising further KMC measurement research is important so that high quality data can be used to accelerate scale-up of high impact care for the most vulnerable.

摘要

背景

袋鼠式护理(KMC)可降低体重≤2000 克的稳定新生儿的死亡率。缺乏对调查和常规信息系统中 KMC 覆盖范围和质量的数据跟踪,阻碍了其推广。本文评估了 KMC 测量,作为新生儿出生指标研究追踪(EN-BIRTH)研究的一部分。

方法

EN-BIRTH 是一项在孟加拉国、尼泊尔和坦桑尼亚的五家医院进行的观察性混合方法研究。临床观察人员为 KMC 病房/角落中的母婴对收集带时间戳的数据,作为金标准。为了评估准确性,我们将常规登记记录和妇女出院调查报告的覆盖范围与观察数据进行了比较,使用了不同的推荐分母选项(≤2000 克和≤2499 克)。我们分析了 KMC 提供的质量差距和经验。在坦桑尼亚的医院,我们评估了每日皮肤接触时间/剂量和喂养频率。从卫生工作者和数据收集者那里收集了有关常规登记设计、填写和使用的障碍和促进因素的定性数据。

结果

在 840 对母婴中,与观察到的 100%覆盖范围相比,出院调查报告(99.9%)和登记记录的覆盖范围(92.9%)都是高度有效的测量方法,具有很高的敏感性。KMC 专用登记册优于一般登记册。登记记录的促进因素包括对数据有用性的看法,而障碍包括数据元素的重复和卫生工作者负担过重。KMC 质量方面存在一些差距,包括帽子的佩戴等位置组件。在坦桑尼亚的 Temeke,10.6%的婴儿每天接受≥20 小时的 KMC 皮肤接触,另有 75.3%的婴儿接受 12-19 小时的 KMC 皮肤接触。在坦桑尼亚 Temeke,36.5%的婴儿每天规律喂养≥8 次,而在坦桑尼亚 Muhimbili,14.6%的婴儿每天规律喂养≥8 次。奶瓶喂养是主要的辅助喂养方式。住院期间家庭支持情况各不相同,祖母在孟加拉国更常共同提供 KMC。45%的妇女在出院调查时报告没有为其他家庭成员安排任何设施。

结论

常规医院 KMC 登记数据有可能从医院 KMC 病房/角落跟踪覆盖范围。妇女在出院调查时准确报告了 KMC,因此可以考虑用于基于人群的调查。KMC 的内容、质量和经验的衡量需要就定义达成共识。优先进行更多的 KMC 测量研究非常重要,以便可以使用高质量的数据来加速最脆弱人群的高影响力护理的推广。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adc1/7995571/5143ecf6e29a/12884_2020_3423_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验