Ullrich G
Institut für Psychologie an der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal. 1988;34(2):166-77.
The starting position of this study was the striking discrepancy between clinical hypothesis on "projective reduplication" and their empirical validation. Empirical data for the statistical analysis derived from a heterogeneous group of psychosomatically ill persons (N = 33) and a group of normal controls (N = 30). Using the similarity of the image of one's self and the one of others as an experimental analogy of the "projective reduplication", we could not ascertain any verifying hint for this syndrome. The results of the present study do not support the assumption of a clinical phenomenon according to the hypotheses tested. But it still remains uncertain whether these hypotheses are appropriate transformations of clinical experience.
本研究的出发点是关于“投射性复制”的临床假设与其实证验证之间存在的显著差异。用于统计分析的实证数据来自一组身心疾病患者(N = 33)和一组正常对照组(N = 30)。我们以自我形象与他人形象的相似性作为“投射性复制”的实验类比,却未能确定任何支持该综合征的证据。本研究结果并不支持所测试假设中关于临床现象的假设。但这些假设是否是临床经验的恰当转化仍不确定。