Bastiaens Tim, Smits Dirk, Claes Laurence
Department of Diagnostics, University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium.
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 9;12:627119. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.627119. eCollection 2021.
We report on two individuals presenting for treatment as part of everyday clinical practice, comparing their pathological personality traits through the lens of the ICD-11 trait qualifiers and the DSM-5 Section III personality trait model. We compare higher order pathological personality domains and lower order pathological personality trait facets of patient M (diagnosed with borderline personality traits according to DSM-5 Section II), and patient L (diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive personality traits according to DSM-5 Section II) with normative data and with each other. Findings highlight the clinical utility of a ICD-11/DSM-5 combined view, including: (1) the Disinhibition/Anankastia personality domain distinction as advocated in the ICD-11 model, (2) the Psychoticism personality domain as conceptualized in the DSM-5 Section III personality trait model, as well as (3) the use of lower order personality trait facets within each higher order personality domain.
我们报告了两名作为日常临床实践一部分前来接受治疗的个体,通过国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)特质限定词和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)第三部分人格特质模型来比较他们的病理性人格特质。我们将患者M(根据DSM - 5第二部分被诊断为边缘型人格特质)和患者L(根据DSM - 5第二部分被诊断为强迫型人格特质)的高阶病理性人格领域和低阶病理性人格特质方面与规范数据以及彼此进行比较。研究结果突出了ICD - 11/DSM - 5综合视角的临床实用性,包括:(1)ICD - 11模型所倡导的抑制解除/强迫型人格领域区分,(2)DSM - 5第三部分人格特质模型中概念化的精神病性人格领域,以及(3)在每个高阶人格领域内使用低阶人格特质方面。