Long Eric S, Diefenbach Duane R, Lutz Clayton L, Wallingford Bret D, Rosenberry Christopher S
Department of Biology Seattle Pacific University Seattle WA USA.
Pennsylvania Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Pennsylvania State University U.S. Geological Survey University Park PA USA.
Ecol Evol. 2021 Feb 4;11(6):2731-2740. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7227. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Natal dispersal is assumed to be a particularly risky movement behavior as individuals transfer, often long distances, from birth site to site of potential first reproduction. Though, because this behavior persists in populations, it is assumed that dispersal increases the fitness of individuals despite the potential for increased risk of mortality. The extent of dispersal risk, however, has rarely been tested, especially for large mammals. Therefore, we aimed to test the relationship between dispersal and survival for both males and females in a large herbivore. Using a radio-transmittered sample of 398 juvenile male and 276 juvenile female white-tailed deer (), we compared survival rates of dispersers and nondispersers. We predicted that dispersing deer would experience greater overall mortality than philopatric deer due to direct transfer-related risks (e.g., vehicular collision), indirect immigration-related mortality attributable to colonization of unfamiliar habitat, and increased overwinter mortality associated with energetic costs of movement and unfamiliarity with recently colonized habitat. For both male and female yearlings, survival rates of dispersers (male = 49.9%, female = 64.0%) did not differ from nondispersers (male = 51.6%, female = 70.7%). Only two individuals (both female) were killed by vehicular collision during transfer, and overwinter survival patterns were similar between the two groups. Although dispersal movement likely incurs energetic costs on dispersers, these costs do not necessarily translate to decreased survival. In many species, including white-tailed deer, dispersal is likely condition-dependent, such that larger and healthier individuals are more likely to disperse; therefore, costs associated with dispersal are more likely to be borne successfully by those individuals that do disperse. Whether low-risk dispersal of large mammals is the rule or the exception will require additional research. Further, future research is needed to evaluate nonsurvival fitness-related costs and benefits of dispersal (e.g., increased reproductive opportunities for dispersers).
出生后的扩散被认为是一种特别危险的移动行为,因为个体通常要从出生地长途迁徙到潜在的首次繁殖地点。然而,由于这种行为在种群中持续存在,所以尽管扩散有可能增加死亡风险,但人们认为它能提高个体的适应性。不过,扩散风险的程度很少得到验证,尤其是对于大型哺乳动物而言。因此,我们旨在测试一种大型食草动物中雄性和雌性的扩散与生存之间的关系。我们使用了398只幼年雄性和276只幼年雌性白尾鹿的无线电跟踪样本,比较了扩散个体和非扩散个体的存活率。我们预测,由于直接的迁移相关风险(如车辆碰撞)、因不熟悉栖息地的定居而导致的间接移民相关死亡率,以及与移动的能量消耗和对新定居栖息地的不熟悉相关的越冬死亡率增加,扩散的鹿比留居的鹿总体死亡率更高。对于雄性和雌性一岁鹿来说,扩散个体(雄性 = 49.9%,雌性 = 64.0%)和非扩散个体(雄性 = 51.6%,雌性 = 70.7%)的存活率没有差异。在迁移过程中只有两只个体(均为雌性)死于车辆碰撞,两组的越冬生存模式相似。尽管扩散移动可能会给扩散个体带来能量消耗,但这些消耗不一定会转化为存活率的降低。在包括白尾鹿在内的许多物种中,扩散可能取决于个体状况,即体型更大、更健康的个体更有可能扩散;因此,与扩散相关的消耗更有可能由那些确实扩散的个体成功承担。大型哺乳动物的低风险扩散是普遍现象还是个别情况,还需要进一步研究。此外,未来还需要研究来评估扩散与非生存适应性相关的成本和收益(例如,扩散个体增加的繁殖机会)。