Agrawal Sanket, Salunke Pravin, Gupta Shailesh, Swain Amlan, Jangra Kiran, Panda Nidhi, Sahu Seelora, Gupta Vivek, Bloria Summit, Kataria Ketan Karsandas, Bhagat Hemant
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, , Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Neurosurgery, , Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Mar 8;12:92. doi: 10.25259/SNI_522_2020. eCollection 2021.
Manipulation during endotracheal intubation in patients with craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies may cause neurological deterioration due to underlying instability. Fiberoptic-bronchoscopy (FOB) is better than video laryngoscope (VL) for minimizing cervical spine movement during intubation. However, evidence suggesting superiority of FOB in patients with CVJ instability is lacking. We prospectively compared dynamic movements of the upper cervical spine during intubation using FOB with VL in patients with CVJ anomalies.
A prospective, randomized, and clinical trial was conducted in 62 patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologist Grade I-II aged between 12 and 65 years with CVJ anomalies. Patients were randomized for intubation under general anesthesia with either VL or FOB. The intubation process was done with application of skeletal traction and recorded cinefluroscopically. The dynamic interrelationship of bony landmarks (horizontal, vertical, and diagonal distances between fixed points on posterior C1 and C2) was analyzed to indirectly calculate alteration of the upper cervical spinal canal diameter (at CVJ). Atlanto-dental interval (ADI) was calculated wherever possible.
The alteration in canal diameter (using bony landmarks) at CVJ during intubation was not significant with the use of either VL or FOB ( > 0.05). In 41 patients, where ADI could be measured, ADI was reduced (increased spinal canal diameter) in a greater number of patients in VL group when compared to FOB group ( < 0.05).
Using rigid skull traction, intubation under general anesthesia with VL offers similar advantage as FOB in terms of the spinal kinematics in patients with CVJ anomalies/instability. Nevertheless, greater number of patients intubated with VL may have an advantage of increased cervical spinal canal diameter when compared to FOB.
颅颈交界区(CVJ)异常患者在气管插管过程中进行操作可能因潜在的不稳定性导致神经功能恶化。纤维支气管镜(FOB)在插管过程中比视频喉镜(VL)更能减少颈椎运动。然而,缺乏证据表明FOB在CVJ不稳定患者中具有优势。我们前瞻性地比较了CVJ异常患者使用FOB和VL插管时上颈椎的动态运动。
对62例年龄在12至65岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会分级为I-II级的CVJ异常患者进行了一项前瞻性、随机临床试验。患者被随机分为在全身麻醉下使用VL或FOB进行插管。插管过程在应用骨骼牵引的情况下进行,并通过电影荧光透视记录。分析骨标志点的动态相互关系(C1和C2后部固定点之间的水平、垂直和对角距离),以间接计算上颈椎管直径(在CVJ处)的变化。尽可能计算寰齿间距(ADI)。
使用VL或FOB插管时,CVJ处的椎管直径变化(使用骨标志点)不显著(>0.05)。在41例可测量ADI的患者中,与FOB组相比,VL组中更多患者的ADI减小(椎管直径增加)(<0.05)。
在CVJ异常/不稳定患者中,使用刚性颅骨牵引,全身麻醉下使用VL插管在脊柱运动学方面与FOB具有相似的优势。然而,与FOB相比,更多使用VL插管的患者可能具有颈椎管直径增加的优势。