Suppr超能文献

学前儿童保育与儿童发展中的不平等现象。

Pre-school childcare and inequalities in child development.

作者信息

Green Michael J, Pearce Anna, Parkes Alison, Robertson Elaine, Katikireddi S Vittal

机构信息

MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 99 Berkeley Street, Glasgow, G3 7HR, United Kingdom.

Public Health Scotland, Meridian Court, 5 Cadogan Street, Glasgow, G2 6QE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2021 Mar 12;14:100776. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100776. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Centre-based childcare may benefit pre-school children and alleviate inequalities in early childhood development, but evidence on socio-emotional and physical health outcomes is limited. Data were from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (n = 14,376). Inverse-probability weighting was used to estimate confounder-adjusted population-average effects of centre and non-centre-based childcare (compared to parental care only) between ages 26-31 months on (age 3): internalising and externalising symptoms, pro-social behaviour, independence, emotional dysregulation, vocabulary, school readiness, and body mass index. To assess impacts on inequalities, controlled direct effects of low parental education and lone parenthood on all outcomes were estimated under two hypothetical scenarios: 1) universal take-up of centre-based childcare; and 2) parental care only. On average, non-centre based childcare improved vocabulary and centre-based care improved school readiness, with little evidence of other benefits. However, socio-economic inequalities were observed for all outcomes and were attenuated in scenario 1 (universal take-up). For example, inequalities in externalising symptoms (according to low parental education) were reduced from a confounder-adjusted standard deviation difference of 7.8 (95% confidence intervals: 6.7-8.8), to 1.7 (0.6-2.7). Inequalities by parental education in scenario 2 (parental care only) were wider than in scenario 1 for externalising symptoms (at 3.4; 2.4-4.4), and for emotional dysregulation and school readiness. Inequalities by lone parenthood, which were smaller, fell in scenario 1, and fell further in scenario 2. Universal access to centre-based pre-school care may alleviate inequalities, while restricted access (e.g. during lockdown for a pandemic such as Covid-19) may widen some inequalities in socioemotional and cognitive development.

摘要

基于中心的儿童保育可能有益于学龄前儿童,并缓解幼儿发展中的不平等现象,但关于社会情感和身体健康结果的证据有限。数据来自英国千禧队列研究(n = 14376)。采用逆概率加权法来估计在26至31个月大时,基于中心的儿童保育和非基于中心的儿童保育(仅与父母照料相比)对3岁儿童内化和外化症状、亲社会行为、独立性、情绪失调、词汇量、入学准备和体重指数的混杂因素调整后的总体平均效应。为了评估对不平等现象的影响,在两种假设情景下估计了低父母教育程度和单亲家庭对所有结果的受控直接效应:1)普遍采用基于中心的儿童保育;2)仅父母照料。平均而言,非基于中心的儿童保育提高了词汇量,基于中心的儿童保育提高了入学准备程度,几乎没有其他益处的证据。然而,所有结果都存在社会经济不平等现象,并且在情景1(普遍采用)中有所减弱。例如,外化症状方面的不平等(根据低父母教育程度)从混杂因素调整后的标准差差异7.8(95%置信区间:6.7 - 8.8)降至1.7(0.6 - 2.7)。在情景2(仅父母照料)中,父母教育程度导致的外化症状不平等(为3.4;2.4 - 4.4)、情绪失调和入学准备方面的不平等比情景1更广泛。单亲家庭导致的不平等较小,在情景1中有所下降,在情景2中进一步下降。普遍获得基于中心的学前保育可能会缓解不平等现象,而受限的获得机会(例如在新冠疫情封锁期间)可能会扩大社会情感和认知发展方面的一些不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c2f/7980060/c103eb1da572/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验