Robertson Elaine, Leyland Alastair, Pearce Anna
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears, Building, 90 Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TB, UK.
SSM Popul Health. 2024 May 23;26:101682. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101682. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Preschool childcare is considered an important policy for reducing inequalities in children's cognitive and socio-emotional development, although the population-level benefits for children under three years, is less clear. We examined the potential for childcare across the whole early years' period to benefit mental health and reduce inequalities, under different hypothetical policy scenarios, in the Growing Up in Scotland study. Marginal structural logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) to quantify inequalities in mental health and consider how these would be altered under different hypothetical scenarios. Mental health (the outcome) was measured using the total Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire score at the start of primary school. Socioeconomic circumstances (the exposure) were represented by maternal educational measured in infancy. Sequence analysis identified common patterns of childcare usage from 10 months to four years (the mediator). Confounders were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weights and analyses accounted for sampling design and attrition (complete case sample, = 3205). With virtually universal uptake of government-funded childcare at 3-4 years, most variation was seen before age three. Four groups were identified: 'Parents, family & friends' (35.8%), 'Grandparents' (32.7%), 'Private group childcare' (e.g. nurseries 23.5%), 'Single professional care' (e.g. childminders 8.1%). Children whose mothers had low, compared to high, educational qualifications were 3.18 times more likely to have mental health problems (95% CI: 1.88-5.37). In a hypothetical scenario where everyone received private group childcare, inequalities increased slightly to 3.78 (95%CI: 1.46-9.76). In an alternative scenario, where everyone received single professional childcare, inequalities in mental health reduced to 2.42 (95% CI: 0.20-28.76), albeit with wide confidence intervals. Universal childcare provision before three years may widen or narrow socioeconomic inequalities in children's mental health, depending on the childcare type provided. Further research is required to understand the role of childcare quality, which we were unable to account for.
学前儿童保育被视为一项减少儿童认知和社会情感发展不平等的重要政策,尽管对于三岁以下儿童在人口层面的益处尚不太明确。在“苏格兰成长”研究中,我们考察了在不同假设政策情景下,整个幼儿期的儿童保育对心理健康有益并减少不平等的可能性。边际结构逻辑回归模型估计比值比(OR)以量化心理健康方面的不平等,并考虑在不同假设情景下这些不平等会如何变化。心理健康(结果变量)通过小学入学时的优势与困难问卷总分来衡量。社会经济状况(暴露变量)由婴儿期测量的母亲教育程度来代表。序列分析确定了从10个月到4岁的儿童保育使用常见模式(中介变量)。使用治疗权重的逆概率对混杂因素进行调整,分析考虑了抽样设计和损耗(完整病例样本,n = 3205)。由于3 - 4岁时政府资助的儿童保育几乎普及,大部分差异出现在三岁之前。确定了四组:“父母、家人和朋友”(35.8%)、“祖父母”(32.7%)、“私人团体保育”(如托儿所,23.5%)、“单一专业照料”(如儿童保育员,8.1%)。与母亲具有高学历的儿童相比,母亲学历低的儿童出现心理健康问题的可能性高3.18倍(95%置信区间:1.88 - 5.37)。在一个假设情景中,即每个人都接受私人团体保育,不平等略有增加至3.78(95%置信区间:1.46 - 9.76)。在另一个情景中,即每个人都接受单一专业保育,心理健康方面的不平等降至2.42(95%置信区间:0.20 - 28.76),尽管置信区间较宽。三岁前提供普及的儿童保育可能会扩大或缩小儿童心理健康方面的社会经济不平等,这取决于所提供的儿童保育类型。需要进一步研究以了解儿童保育质量的作用,我们在此无法考虑这一因素。