• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供受体体型不匹配对尸体供肝全肝移植术后结局无影响:供肝体积测量的作用。

Donor-recipient body size mismatch has no impact on outcomes after deceased donor whole liver transplantation: Role of donor liver size measurement.

机构信息

Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2021 Jun;35(6):e14299. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14299. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14299
PMID:33768588
Abstract

The role of donor-recipient body size mismatch (DRSM) on outcomes after whole liver transplantation (LT) is not clearly defined. At our center, in presence of considerable DRSM, objective assessment of the donor liver by a radiology or intraoperative evaluation by procuring surgeon was incorporated. To evaluate the impact of DRSM on graft outcomes with this approach, adult deceased donor whole liver transplants between July 2001 and December 2017 at our center were studied. DRSM was considered when the donor-recipient body surface area (BSA) ratio (DR-BSAr) was either <0.69 or >1.25. There were 54 (3.2%) transplants with DR-BSAr <0.69 and 61 (3.6%) with DR-BSAr >1.25. One-year graft survival was 85% vs. 89% vs. 89%; (p = .64) for transplants with DR-BSArs of <0.69, 0.69-1.25, and >1.25, respectively. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) (28% vs. 27% vs. 37%; p = .07), post-transplant coagulopathy, bilirubinemia, and renal function were also comparable. In conclusion, with the actual measurement of the donor liver and recipient abdominal cavity, significant DRSM did not have a negative impact on early and long-term outcomes. Routine measurement of donor liver size by radiology may be incorporated in liver allocation to improve utilization.

摘要

供体-受者体表面积比值(DR-BSAr)<0.69 或>1.25 时,认为存在供体-受者体型不匹配(DRSM)。本研究回顾性分析了 2001 年 7 月至 2017 年 12 月期间本中心行成人尸体供肝全肝移植患者的临床资料,旨在评估该方法中 DRSM 对移植物结局的影响。DRSM 存在时,通过影像学或供肝切取术外科医生的术中评估来客观评估供肝。研究对象中,DR-BSAr<0.69 的患者 54 例(3.2%),DR-BSAr>1.25 的患者 61 例(3.6%)。DR-BSAr<0.69、0.69-1.25 和>1.25 的患者 1 年移植物存活率分别为 85%、89%和 89%(p=0.64)。早期移植物功能障碍(EAD)(28%、27%和 37%;p=0.07)、移植后凝血功能障碍、胆红素血症和肾功能也相似。总之,通过实际测量供肝和受者的腹腔,明显的 DRSM 并未对早期和长期结局产生负面影响。可能需要通过影像学常规测量供肝大小,以改善供肝的利用。

相似文献

1
Donor-recipient body size mismatch has no impact on outcomes after deceased donor whole liver transplantation: Role of donor liver size measurement.供受体体型不匹配对尸体供肝全肝移植术后结局无影响:供肝体积测量的作用。
Clin Transplant. 2021 Jun;35(6):e14299. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14299. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Role of intelligent/interactive qualitative and quantitative analysis-three-dimensional estimated model in donor-recipient size mismatch following deceased donor liver transplantation.智能/交互式定性和定量分析-三维估计模型在死亡供肝肝移植后供受者大小不匹配中的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 28;29(44):5894-5906. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i44.5894.
3
Size mismatch in deceased donor liver transplantation and its impact on graft survival.供体肝移植中大小不匹配及其对移植物存活的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Aug;33(8):e13662. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13662. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
Donor-Recipient Body Surface Area Mismatch and the Outcome of Liver Transplantation in the UK.英国供体-受者体表面积不匹配与肝移植结局。
Prog Transplant. 2023 Mar;33(1):61-68. doi: 10.1177/15269248221145035. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
5
A novel objective method for deceased donor and recipient size matching in liver transplantation.一种用于肝移植中供体与受体尺寸匹配的新型客观方法。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Dec;21(12):1471-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.24333. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
6
Long-term impact of donor-recipient size mismatching in deceased donor kidney transplantation and in expanded criteria donor recipients.在尸体供肾移植和扩展标准供体受者中,供受者体型不匹配的长期影响。
Transplantation. 2010 Oct 27;90(8):867-74. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181f24e75.
7
UNOS Liver Registry: ten year survivals.器官共享联合网络肝脏登记处:十年生存率
Clin Transpl. 2006:29-39.
8
Patterns of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: The A2ALL Experience.成人活体供肝移植早期移植肝功能障碍模式:A2ALL研究经验
Transplantation. 2016 Jul;100(7):1490-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001240.
9
Early outcomes of implanting larger-sized grafts in deceased donor liver transplantation.在已故供体肝移植中植入更大尺寸移植物的早期结果
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1352-1357. doi: 10.1111/ans.16132. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
10
Size mismatch in liver transplantation.肝移植中的尺寸不匹配
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Aug;23(8):457-66. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.371. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Recipient-Donor Sex Constellation in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-An ELTR Study.肝细胞癌肝移植中受者与供者性别组合——一项欧洲肝脏移植登记处(ELTR)的研究
Liver Int. 2025 Jan;45(1):e16178. doi: 10.1111/liv.16178. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
Revisiting the Prognostic Influences of Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation.重新审视已故供体肝移植中供受体大小不匹配的预后影响
Transplant Direct. 2024 Oct 18;10(11):e1722. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001722. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Quantifying the Disadvantage of Small Recipient Size on the Liver Transplantation Waitlist, a Longitudinal Analysis Within the Eurotransplant Region.
量化肝脏移植等待名单上小受者体型的不利因素:欧洲移植区域内的纵向分析
Transplantation. 2024 May 1;108(5):1149-1156. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004804. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Radiological Screening Methods in Deceased Organ Donation: An Overview of Guidelines Worldwide.死亡器官捐献中的放射影像学筛查方法:全球指南概述。
Transpl Int. 2022 May 19;35:10289. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10289. eCollection 2022.