• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供体肝移植中大小不匹配及其对移植物存活的影响。

Size mismatch in deceased donor liver transplantation and its impact on graft survival.

机构信息

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory (CBATL), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2019 Aug;33(8):e13662. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13662. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.13662
PMID:31283049
Abstract

The impact of size mismatch in deceased donor liver transplantation is unknown. BSA has been demonstrated to be an accurate indicator of liver volume. We developed a model to match livers by BSA and estimate the impact of size mismatch on graft survival. Using the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) database we selected solitary primary liver transplants recipients of any age, transplanted between 3/6/2002 and 12/31/2016. Using the Cox proportional hazard model, and controlling for donor and recipient factors, we determined the relative risk for graft survival for four donor/recipient body surface area ratio groups (≤0.68, 0.69-0.90, 0.91-1.25, 1.26-1.5). We studied two groups: recipients with a BSA > 1.6 (adults) and ≤1.6 (children) and a subgroup with a BSA ≤ 0.53 (small infants). In recipients with BSA > 1.6 (adults [n = 71 365]), D/R ratios ≤ 0.68 and > 1.25 had a negative impact on graft survival. In recipients with BSA ≤ 1.6 (children [n = 8339]) D/R ratios <0.75 and >1.25 had a negative impact on graft survival. In the 1725 recipients with BSA ≤ 0.53 (small infants) D/R ratios <1 and >2.3 had a negative impact on graft survival. In deceased donor liver transplantation, the D/R ratio is a significant, yet underestimated predictor of graft survival that should be considered in donor and recipient selection.

摘要

在尸体供肝肝移植中,大小不匹配的影响尚不清楚。BSA 已被证明是肝体积的准确指标。我们开发了一种通过 BSA 匹配肝脏的模型,并估计大小不匹配对移植物存活率的影响。使用标准移植分析和研究 (STAR) 数据库,我们选择了任何年龄的单独原发性肝脏移植受者,他们在 2002 年 3 月 6 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日之间接受了移植。使用 Cox 比例风险模型,并控制供体和受者因素,我们确定了四个供体/受者体表面积比组(≤0.68、0.69-0.90、0.91-1.25、1.26-1.5)的移植物存活率相对风险。我们研究了两组:BSA>1.6(成人)和≤1.6(儿童)的受者,以及 BSA≤0.53(小婴儿)的亚组。在 BSA>1.6(成人[n=71365])的受者中,D/R 比≤0.68 和>1.25 对移植物存活率有负面影响。在 BSA≤1.6(儿童[n=8339])的受者中,D/R 比<0.75 和>1.25 对移植物存活率有负面影响。在 BSA≤0.53(小婴儿)的 1725 名受者中,D/R 比<1 和>2.3 对移植物存活率有负面影响。在尸体供肝肝移植中,D/R 比是移植物存活率的一个重要但被低估的预测指标,在供体和受者选择中应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Size mismatch in deceased donor liver transplantation and its impact on graft survival.供体肝移植中大小不匹配及其对移植物存活的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Aug;33(8):e13662. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13662. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
2
Technique and outcome of domino liver transplantation from patients with maple syrup urine disease: Expanding the donor pool for live donor liver transplantation.枫糖尿症患者多米诺式肝移植的技术和结果:扩大活体肝移植供体池。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Nov;33(11):e13721. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13721. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
3
Long-term impact of donor-recipient size mismatching in deceased donor kidney transplantation and in expanded criteria donor recipients.在尸体供肾移植和扩展标准供体受者中,供受者体型不匹配的长期影响。
Transplantation. 2010 Oct 27;90(8):867-74. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181f24e75.
4
Donor heart dysfunction and graft survival in liver and kidney transplants-A register-based study from Sweden.供体心脏功能障碍与肝肾移植受者的移植物存活:来自瑞典的基于登记的研究。
Clin Transplant. 2024 May;38(5):e15333. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15333.
5
Adult-size kidneys without acute tubular necrosis provide exceedingly superior long-term graft outcomes for infants and small children: a single center and UNOS analysis. United Network for Organ Sharing.无急性肾小管坏死的成人尺寸肾脏为婴幼儿提供了极其优异的长期移植效果:单中心及器官共享联合网络(UNOS)分析。器官共享联合网络
Transplantation. 2000 Dec 27;70(12):1728-36. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200012270-00012.
6
Interaction of older donor age and survival after weight-matched pediatric heart transplantation.老年供体年龄与体重匹配的儿科心脏移植后存活的相互作用。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 May;36(5):554-558. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
7
Receiving Hypertensive Donor Grafts Is Associated with Inferior Prognosis in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Recipients.接受高血压供体移植物与肝肾联合移植受者预后不良相关。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Apr 20;24:2391-2403. doi: 10.12659/msm.909706.
8
Donor and recipient size mismatch in adolescents undergoing living-donor renal transplantation affect long-term graft survival.青少年活体供肾移植中供受者体型不匹配影响长期移植物存活率。
Transplantation. 2013 Sep;96(6):555-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31829d672c.
9
The UK DCD Risk Score: A new proposal to define futility in donation-after-circulatory-death liver transplantation.英国 DCD 风险评分:一种定义脑死亡后捐献肝脏移植中无效性的新提案。
J Hepatol. 2018 Mar;68(3):456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.034. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
10
Hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplant: Donation after cardiac death donor vs donation after brain death donor grafts.肝移植后肝动脉狭窄:心脏死亡供体与脑死亡供体移植物。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Nov;32(11):e13413. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13413. Epub 2018 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives and Tools in Liver Graft Assessment: A Transformative Era in Liver Transplantation.肝脏移植评估的视角与工具:肝脏移植的变革时代
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 17;13(2):494. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020494.
2
Revisiting the Prognostic Influences of Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation.重新审视已故供体肝移植中供受体大小不匹配的预后影响
Transplant Direct. 2024 Oct 18;10(11):e1722. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001722. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Evaluating the Correlation Between Anteroposterior Diameter, Body Surface Area, and Height for Liver Transplant Donors and Recipients.
评估肝移植供体和受体的前后径、体表面积与身高之间的相关性。
Transplant Direct. 2024 May 16;10(6):e1630. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001630. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Impact of sex on the outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation.性别对已故供体肝移植结局的影响。
World J Transplant. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):88133. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.88133.
5
Role of intelligent/interactive qualitative and quantitative analysis-three-dimensional estimated model in donor-recipient size mismatch following deceased donor liver transplantation.智能/交互式定性和定量分析-三维估计模型在死亡供肝肝移植后供受者大小不匹配中的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 28;29(44):5894-5906. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i44.5894.
6
Quantifying the Disadvantage of Small Recipient Size on the Liver Transplantation Waitlist, a Longitudinal Analysis Within the Eurotransplant Region.量化肝脏移植等待名单上小受者体型的不利因素:欧洲移植区域内的纵向分析
Transplantation. 2024 May 1;108(5):1149-1156. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004804. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
7
Maximizing utility of nondirected living liver donor grafts using machine learning.利用机器学习最大限度地提高非定向活体肝供体移植物的效用。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1194338. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1194338. eCollection 2023.
8
Natural history and prognosis of pediatric PSC with updates on management.儿童原发性硬化性胆管炎的自然病史与预后及管理进展
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2023 Jan 13;21(2):47-51. doi: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000006. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
nnU-Net Deep Learning Method for Segmenting Parenchyma and Determining Liver Volume From Computed Tomography Images.基于计算机断层扫描图像的nnU-Net深度学习方法用于实质分割和肝脏体积测定
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jun;3(2). doi: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000155. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
10
Volumetric assessment of hepatic grafts using a light detection and ranging system for 3D scanning: Preliminary data.使用光探测与测距系统进行三维扫描对肝移植供肝进行容积评估:初步数据。
World J Hepatol. 2022 Jul 27;14(7):1504-1511. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i7.1504.