• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“平等”、“能力方法”与伦理医疗范式:接口

"Equality", the "Capability Approach" and the Ethical Health Care Paradigm: The Interface.

作者信息

Vir Singh Kanwar Abhay, Mahmudur Rahim Mia

机构信息

PhD Candidate, School of Development Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai.

Associate Professor, School of Law, University of New England.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2021 Mar;28(2):567-585.

PMID:33768759
Abstract

As a means of abating the crises of society, the idea of equality has long been a progressive, universal, moral and legal principle to seek justice. However, equality is open to a broad spectrum of meanings and practical applications, mainly due to its endorsement of different interpretations and concepts that give rise to complementary and competing interests. Likewise, the "capability approach", which is proposed as an alternative to the "ideal of equality", is not only contentious but also insufficient to build the theoretical basis of an ethical health care paradigm. This article aims to expand the discussion on the ambiguity around the concept of equality, particularly how it interacts with the diversities in human capabilities in a given context.

摘要

作为缓解社会危机的一种手段,平等观念长期以来一直是一项追求正义的进步、普遍、道德和法律原则。然而,平等具有广泛的含义和实际应用,主要是因为它认可不同的解释和概念,这些解释和概念引发了互补和相互竞争的利益。同样,作为“平等理想”替代方案提出的“能力方法”不仅存在争议,而且不足以构建道德医疗保健范式的理论基础。本文旨在扩展关于平等概念周围模糊性的讨论,特别是在特定背景下它如何与人类能力的多样性相互作用。

相似文献

1
"Equality", the "Capability Approach" and the Ethical Health Care Paradigm: The Interface.“平等”、“能力方法”与伦理医疗范式:接口
J Law Med. 2021 Mar;28(2):567-585.
2
Efficiency or equality? The utilitarianism-egalitarianism trade-off determines carbon allocation preference.效率还是平等?功利主义-平等主义的权衡决定了碳分配偏好。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Apr;63(2):745-766. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12702. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Forget about equality.忘掉平等吧。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Jun;6(2):129-44. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0009.
4
Equality as an ethical concept within the context of nursing care rationing.在护理资源分配背景下,平等作为一种伦理概念。
Nurs Philos. 2020 Jan;21(1):e12284. doi: 10.1111/nup.12284. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
5
Moral agency as enacted justice: a clinical and ethical decision-making framework for responding to health inequities and social injustice.道德代理作为实施的正义:应对健康不平等和社会不公正的临床和伦理决策框架。
Phys Ther. 2011 Nov;91(11):1653-63. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100351.20. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
6
Epistemic Equality: Distributive Epistemic Justice in the Context of Justification.认知平等:证明语境下的分配性认知公正
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2022;32(2):173-203. doi: 10.1353/ken.2022.0011.
7
A framework for measuring health inequity.衡量健康不平等的框架。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):700-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.031054.
8
Doctrines and Dimensions of Justice: Their Historical Backgrounds and Ideological Underpinnings.正义的学说与维度:其历史背景与思想基础
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018 Apr;27(2):188-216. doi: 10.1017/S096318011700055X.
9
Justice and allocation of medical resources.医疗资源的公平性与分配
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jul 27;291(6490):266-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6490.266.
10
Health care, equality, and inequality: Christian perspectives and moral disagreements.医疗保健、平等与不平等:基督教视角与道德分歧。
Christ Bioeth. 1996;2(3):271-9. doi: 10.1093/cb/2.3.271.