• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肺对活跃成年人急性高强度功能性训练和传统运动的反应。

Cardiorespiratory responses to acute bouts of high-intensity functional training and traditional exercise in physically active adults.

机构信息

Department of Human Performance and Health, University of South Carolina Upstate, Spartanburg, SC, USA -

Department of Kinesiology, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2022 Feb;62(2):199-206. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12115-2. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12115-2
PMID:33768774
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-intensity functional training is a popular form of exercise, but little is known about how it compares to more traditional exercise patterns.

METHODS

Thirty healthy, physically active adults (15 males, 15 females) performed a high-intensity functional training workout (HIFT) and a traditional workout (TRAD). Cardiorespiratory responses were measured during and for 15 min after each workout.

RESULTS

Peak heart rate (males: 187±7 vs. 171±10 bpm, P<0.001; females: 191±9 vs. 175±6 bpm, P<0.001), peak VO2 (males: 3.80±0.58 vs. 3.26±0.60 L/min, P<0.001; females: 2.65±0.26 vs. 2.36±0.21, P<0.001), and average 15 min recovery VO2 (males: 1.15±0.20 vs. 0.99±0.17 L/min, P<0.001; females: 0.77±0.10 vs. 0.71±0.07 L/min, P=0.019) were significantly higher in HIFT vs. TRAD. Aerobic energy expenditure was significantly higher in HIFT compared to TRAD in males (9.01±1.43 vs. 8.53±1.38 kcal/min, P=0.002) but was not significantly different between the two workouts in females (6.04±0.53 vs. 5.97±0.50 kcal/min, P=0.395). Postexercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly higher than pre-exercise SBP following both HIFT (males: 124±13 mmHg pre to 154±28 mmHg post, P<0.001; females: 110±7 mmHg pre to 140±15 mmHg post, P<0.001) and TRAD (males: 124±13 mmHg pre to 142±16 mmHg post, P=0.002; females: 112±8 mmHg pre to 123±10 mmHg post, P=0.002), however, HIFT led to a greater increase compared to TRAD in females (P=0.001). Postexercise diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was significantly lower than pre-exercise DBP following both HIFT (males: 77±9 mmHg pre to 64±6 mmHg post, P<0.001; females: 71±8 mmHg pre to 64±7 mmHg post, P=0.011) and TRAD (males: 82±7 mmHg pre to 72±7 mmHg post, P<0.001; females: 73±8 mmHg pre to 65±8 mmHg post, P<0.001). Mean arterial blood pressure was unchanged following both workouts.

CONCLUSIONS

High-intensity functional training may be an effective form of exercise for caloric expenditure and may elicit greater cardiorespiratory stress than traditional exercise.

摘要

背景

高强度功能性训练是一种流行的运动方式,但关于它与更传统的运动模式相比如何,我们知之甚少。

方法

30 名健康、活跃的成年人(15 名男性,15 名女性)进行了高强度功能性训练(HIFT)和传统训练(TRAD)。在每次锻炼期间和之后的 15 分钟内测量心肺反应。

结果

男性的峰值心率(HIFT:187±7 次/分,TRAD:171±10 次/分,P<0.001;女性:HIFT:191±9 次/分,TRAD:175±6 次/分,P<0.001)、峰值 VO2(HIFT:3.80±0.58 L/min,TRAD:3.26±0.60 L/min,P<0.001;女性:HIFT:2.65±0.26 L/min,TRAD:2.36±0.21 L/min,P<0.001)和平均 15 分钟恢复 VO2(HIFT:1.15±0.20 L/min,TRAD:0.99±0.17 L/min,P<0.001;女性:HIFT:0.77±0.10 L/min,TRAD:0.71±0.07 L/min,P=0.019)在 HIFT 中明显高于 TRAD。与 TRAD 相比,男性的有氧运动消耗在 HIFT 中显著更高(9.01±1.43 kcal/min,TRAD:8.53±1.38 kcal/min,P=0.002),但在女性中没有显著差异(6.04±0.53 kcal/min,TRAD:5.97±0.50 kcal/min,P=0.395)。与运动前相比,HIFT(男性:124±13 mmHg 到 154±28 mmHg,P<0.001;女性:110±7 mmHg 到 140±15 mmHg,P<0.001)和 TRAD(男性:124±13 mmHg 到 142±16 mmHg,P=0.002;女性:112±8 mmHg 到 123±10 mmHg,P=0.002)后收缩压(SBP)均显著高于运动前,而 HIFT 后女性的 SBP 升高幅度大于 TRAD(P=0.001)。与运动前相比,HIFT(男性:77±9 mmHg 到 64±6 mmHg,P<0.001;女性:71±8 mmHg 到 64±7 mmHg,P=0.011)和 TRAD(男性:82±7 mmHg 到 72±7 mmHg,P<0.001;女性:73±8 mmHg 到 65±8 mmHg,P<0.001)后舒张压(DBP)均显著低于运动前。平均动脉血压在两次运动后均无变化。

结论

高强度功能性训练可能是一种有效的卡路里消耗运动方式,与传统运动相比,可能会引起更大的心肺压力。

相似文献

1
Cardiorespiratory responses to acute bouts of high-intensity functional training and traditional exercise in physically active adults.心肺对活跃成年人急性高强度功能性训练和传统运动的反应。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2022 Feb;62(2):199-206. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12115-2. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Energy Expenditure and Intensity of Group-Based High-Intensity Functional Training: A Brief Report.基于小组的高强度功能性训练的能量消耗和强度:简要报告。
J Phys Act Health. 2019 Jun 1;16(6):470-476. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0585. Epub 2019 May 19.
3
High-intensity compared to moderate-intensity training for exercise initiation, enjoyment, adherence, and intentions: an intervention study.高强度与中等强度训练对运动起始、愉悦感、依从性及意愿的影响:一项干预研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 3;14:789. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-789.
4
The metabolic costs of reciprocal supersets vs. traditional resistance exercise in young recreationally active adults.年轻人在进行娱乐性体育活动时,相比传统抗阻训练,互相对抗的超级组训练的代谢成本。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Apr;24(4):1043-51. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d3e993.
5
Quantifying CrossFit: Potential solutions for monitoring multimodal workloads and identifying training targets.量化CrossFit:监测多模式工作量和确定训练目标的潜在解决方案。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Oct 14;4:949429. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.949429. eCollection 2022.
6
Brief Vigorous Stair Climbing Effectively Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial.短暂剧烈爬楼梯可有效改善冠心病患者的心肺适能:一项随机试验
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Feb 16;3:630912. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.630912. eCollection 2021.
7
Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training and Continuous Moderate-Intensity Training on Blood Pressure in Physically Inactive Pre-Hypertensive Young Adults.高强度间歇训练与持续中等强度训练对缺乏运动的高血压前期年轻成年人血压的影响
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Aug 3;9(8):246. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9080246.
8
Acute leucocyte, muscle damage, and stress marker responses to high-intensity functional training.高强度功能性训练对白细胞、肌肉损伤和应激标志物的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243276. eCollection 2020.
9
Not All HIFT Classes Are Created Equal: Evaluating Energy Expenditure and Relative Intensity of a High-Intensity Functional Training Regimen.并非所有高强度功能性训练课程都是一样的:评估一种高强度功能性训练方案的能量消耗和相对强度。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Sep 1;13(4):1206-1216. doi: 10.70252/IUSV1063. eCollection 2020.
10
Validity of Activity Trackers in Estimating Energy Expenditure During High-Intensity Functional Training.活动追踪器在估计高强度功能性训练期间能量消耗的有效性。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019 Sep;90(3):377-384. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1603989. Epub 2019 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Exercise induced hypoalgesia after a high intensity functional training: a randomized controlled crossover study.高强度功能训练后运动诱导的痛觉减退:一项随机对照交叉研究。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Aug 28;16(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00969-4.
2
Methods to Assess Energy Expenditure of Resistance Exercise: A Systematic Scoping Review.评估抗阻运动能量消耗的方法:系统范围综述。
Sports Med. 2024 Sep;54(9):2357-2372. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02047-8. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Effects of Different Recovery Modalities on Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness, Recovery Perceptions, and Performance Following a Bout of High-Intensity Functional Training.
不同恢复方式对高强度功能性训练后延迟性肌肉酸痛、恢复感知和表现的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;20(4):3461. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043461.
4
Acute physiological outcomes of high-intensity functional training: a scoping review.高强度功能性训练的急性生理结果:范围综述。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 3;11:e14493. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14493. eCollection 2023.
5
The Effects of a Single Session of High Intensity Functional Training on Energy Expenditure, VO, and Blood Lactate.单次高强度功能性训练对能量消耗、摄氧量和血乳酸的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2022 Dec 1;21(4):545-554. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2022.547. eCollection 2022 Dec.