de Jong Ype, Fu Edouard L, van Diepen Merel, Trevisan Marco, Szummer Karolina, Dekker Friedo W, Carrero Juan J, Ocak Gurbey
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 14;42(15):1476-1485. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab059.
The increasing prevalence of ischaemic stroke (IS) can partly be explained by the likewise growing number of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Risk scores have been developed to identify high-risk patients, allowing for personalized anticoagulation therapy. However, predictive performance in CKD is unclear. The aim of this study is to validate six commonly used risk scores for IS in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients across the spectrum of kidney function.
Overall, 36 004 subjects with newly diagnosed AF from SCREAM (Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements), a healthcare utilization cohort of Stockholm residents, were included. Predictive performance of the AFI, CHADS2, Modified CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, ATRIA, and GARFIELD-AF risk scores was evaluated across three strata of kidney function: normal kidney function [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 mL/min/1.73 m2], mild CKD (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and advanced CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Predictive performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. During 1.9 years, 3069 (8.5%) patients suffered an IS. Discrimination was dependent on eGFR: the median c-statistic in normal eGFR was 0.75 (range 0.68-0.78), but decreased to 0.68 (0.58-0.73) and 0.68 (0.55-0.74) for mild and advanced CKD, respectively. Calibration was reasonable and largely independent of eGFR. The Modified CHADS2 score showed good performance across kidney function strata, both for discrimination [c-statistic: 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.79), 0.73 (0.71-0.74) and 0.74 (0.69-0.79), respectively] and calibration.
In the most clinically relevant stages of CKD, predictive performance of the majority of risk scores was poor, increasing the risk of misclassification and thus of over- or undertreatment. The Modified CHADS2 score performed good and consistently across all kidney function strata, and should therefore be preferred for risk estimation in AF patients.
缺血性卒中(IS)患病率的上升部分可归因于慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者数量的增加。已开发出风险评分来识别高危患者,以实现个性化抗凝治疗。然而,其在CKD患者中的预测性能尚不清楚。本研究旨在验证六种常用的房颤(AF)患者IS风险评分在不同肾功能水平下的有效性。
总体而言,纳入了来自斯德哥尔摩居民医疗利用队列SCREAM(斯德哥尔摩肌酐测量)的36004例新诊断房颤患者。在三个肾功能分层中评估了AFI、CHADS2、改良CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc、ATRIA和GARFIELD-AF风险评分的预测性能:肾功能正常[估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)>60 mL/min/1.73 m²]、轻度CKD(eGFR 30 - 60 mL/min/1.73 m²)和重度CKD(eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²)。通过区分度和校准评估预测性能。在1.9年期间,3069例(8.5%)患者发生了IS。区分度取决于eGFR:正常eGFR时的中位c统计量为0.75(范围0.68 - 0.78),但在轻度和重度CKD中分别降至0.68(0.58 - 0.73)和0.68(0.55 - 0.74)。校准合理且在很大程度上与eGFR无关。改良CHADS2评分在不同肾功能分层中均表现良好,在区分度[c统计量:分别为0.78(95%置信区间0.77 - 0.79)、0.73(0.71 - 0.74)和0.74(0.69 - 0.79)]和校准方面均如此。
在CKD最具临床相关性的阶段,大多数风险评分的预测性能较差,增加了分类错误以及过度治疗或治疗不足的风险。改良CHADS2评分在所有肾功能分层中表现良好且一致,因此在AF患者的风险评估中应优先选用。