Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Genes Brain Behav. 2022 Mar;21(3):e12731. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12731. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
Social hierarchies are ubiquitous features of virtually all animal groups. The varying social ranks of members within these groups have profound effects on both physical and emotional health, with lower-ranked individuals typically being the most adversely affected by their respective ranks. Thus, reliable measures of social dominance in preclinical rodent models are necessary to better understand the effects of an individual's social rank on other behaviors and physiological processes. In this review, we outline the primary methodologies used to assess social dominance in various rodent species: those that are based on analyses of agonistic behaviors, and those that are based on resource competition. In synthesizing this review, we conclude that assays based on resource competition may be better suited to characterize social dominance in a wider variety of rodent species and strains, and in both males and females. Lastly, albeit expectedly, we demonstrate that similarly to many other areas of preclinical research, studies incorporating female subjects are lacking in comparison to those using males. These findings emphasize the need for an increased number of studies assessing social dominance in females to form a more comprehensive understanding of this behavioral phenomenon.
社会等级是几乎所有动物群体普遍存在的特征。这些群体中成员的不同社会等级对身体和情绪健康都有深远的影响,等级较低的个体通常受到各自等级的负面影响最大。因此,在临床前啮齿动物模型中,可靠的社会支配地位衡量标准对于更好地理解个体的社会等级对其他行为和生理过程的影响是必要的。在这篇综述中,我们概述了用于评估各种啮齿动物物种中社会支配地位的主要方法:基于攻击性行为分析的方法,以及基于资源竞争的方法。在综合综述时,我们得出结论,基于资源竞争的测定法可能更适合于描述更广泛的啮齿动物物种和品系以及雄性和雌性动物中的社会支配地位。最后,虽然是意料之中的,但我们表明,与使用雄性动物的研究相比,纳入雌性动物的研究数量明显较少,而类似的情况在许多其他临床前研究领域中也存在。这些发现强调了需要进行更多的研究来评估雌性动物的社会支配地位,以更全面地了解这种行为现象。