Banner Pharmacy Services, Greeley, CO.
Banner Pharmacy Service, Phoenix, AZ.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Apr;27(4):507-515. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.4.507.
There are limited data that evaluate how pharmacists who are integrated within primary care clinics influence proportion of days covered (PDC) and Part D star ratings for the 3 adherence measures: diabetes, hypertension (renin-angiotensin-system antagonists), and cholesterol (statin) medications. To assess the difference in percentage of beneficiaries with a prescription with a PDC of 80% or higher in the adherence prioritization group versus control group. A retrospective cohort study was conducted that collected data from 2019 monthly and end-of-year files provided by Humana Medicare Advantage (MA) Part D for patients attributed to a Banner Medical Group (BMG) primary care provider who filled at least 1 prescription for a medication included in any of the medication adherence classes. The Banner Pharmacy Services population health team prioritized beneficiaries and provided worklists to pharmacists embedded in the BMG primary care clinics in Colorado. The pharmacists performed telephonic outreach, which included patient education, along with leveraging of pharmacist-provider collaborative practice agreements to address barriers, facilitate refills, and convert prescriptions to 90-day supply and mail order. Outreach status was tracked. Colorado patients reached at least once during the study time frame served as the adherence prioritization group, while Arizona patients were propensity score matched and served as the control group. We evaluated the effects of contact with the pharmacist on adherence between the adherence prioritization and control groups with PDC as a binary variable (≥ 80% vs. not) and a continuous variable (0%-100%). Analysis with PDC as a binary variable was also completed for the entire Humana MA Part D cohort. A total of 881 unique patients with prescriptions that fell into one of the medication adherence classes were included in the analysis-294 in the adherence prioritization group and 587 in the control group. Baseline demographics were well balanced between groups. Across the 3 medication classes, the adherence prioritization group had a higher percentage of patients with PDC of 80% or higher (71.0%) versus the matched control group (62.3%), a difference of 8.6% (95% CI = 3.47-13.82, < 0.001). End-of-year data for the adherence prioritization population shows the percentage of patients who passed the medication adherence measure for diabetes, hypertension, and cholesterol was 88%, 89%, and 89%, respectively, while in the control population passing rates were 85%, 88%, and 87%, respectively. Pharmacist-driven interventions can have a meaningful effect on PDC for medication adherence and can ultimately affect star rating measures. Since 2019 data are used for 2021 star rating measures, even small numerical differences as seen in this study may account for the difference between a 4- or 5-star rating. Moving the needle in the right direction can be significant, since the cut point is yet to be determined. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Rinehart, Rice, and Collins are employed by Banner Health but received no specific financial incentives or otherwise related to this research and manuscript. Glover is employed by Pfizer, which had no role in this study. The authors have no other relevant declarations of interest to disclose. This study was presented as a platform presentation at the Southwestern States Residency Conference, June 2020, Phoenix, AZ.
关于药师整合至初级保健诊所如何影响特定药物的用药持续性(PDC)和医疗保险处方药物部分(Part D)星级评分的相关数据有限,这三类特定药物包括:糖尿病、高血压(肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂)和胆固醇(他汀类药物)药物。本研究旨在评估纳入优先治疗组的患者与对照组相比,处方 PD C 达到 80%或更高的受益人群百分比是否存在差异。本研究采用回顾性队列研究,从 2019 年 Humana Medicare Advantage(MA)Part D 每月和年终文件中收集数据,这些数据来源于归属于 Banner Medical Group(BMG)初级保健提供者的患者,他们至少开了一种列入任何药物依从性类别的药物处方。Banner 药房服务团队将受益人群进行优先级排序,并向科罗拉多州 BMG 初级保健诊所中嵌入的药剂师提供工作清单。药剂师通过电话联系患者,包括患者教育,并利用药剂师-提供者合作实践协议来解决障碍、促进续药、将处方转换为 90 天供应量和邮购。同时,还跟踪了外展情况。在研究时间范围内至少联系过一次的科罗拉多州患者被视为优先治疗组,而亚利桑那州患者则进行倾向评分匹配,作为对照组。我们评估了与药剂师的接触对优先治疗组和对照组患者用药依从性的影响,PDC 作为二分类变量(≥80%与非≥80%)和连续变量(0%-100%)进行分析。同时,我们还对整个 Humana MA Part D 队列进行了基于 PDC 的二分类变量分析。共有 881 名服用了一种或多种药物依从性类别药物的患者纳入分析,其中 294 名患者在优先治疗组,587 名患者在对照组。两组患者的基线人口统计学特征均衡。在 3 类药物中,优先治疗组 PD C 达到 80%或更高的患者比例(71.0%)高于匹配对照组(62.3%),差异为 8.6%(95%CI=3.47-13.82,<0.001)。优先治疗组患者的糖尿病、高血压和胆固醇药物依从性测量的年末数据分别为 88%、89%和 89%,而对照组患者的通过率分别为 85%、88%和 87%。药剂师驱动的干预措施对药物依从性的 PD C 可能产生有意义的影响,并最终影响星级评分指标。由于 2019 年的数据用于 2021 年的星级评分指标,因此,即使像本研究中观察到的微小数值差异,也可能导致 4 星或 5 星评分之间的差异。朝着正确的方向努力可能会产生显著的效果,因为目前还没有确定临界点。本研究没有得到任何公共、商业或非营利部门的资助机构的特殊资助。Rinehart、Rice 和 Collins 受雇于 Banner Health,但他们的薪酬与本研究和手稿没有直接关联。Glover 受雇于辉瑞公司,与本研究无关。作者没有其他相关的利益声明要披露。本研究在 2020 年 6 月于亚利桑那州凤凰城举行的西南州住院医师会议上作为平台演讲进行了介绍。