Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Pharmacy Services, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Mar;29(3):266-275. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.266.
The population health inpatient Medicare Advantage pharmacist (PHIMAP) intervention is a pharmacist-led, transitions-of-care intervention that aims to reduce hospital readmissions among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. PHIMAP includes inpatient pharmacist participation in interdisciplinary rounds, admission and discharge medication reconciliation, pharmacy staff delivery of discharge medications to the bedside, personalized discharge medication lists and counseling, and communication with outpatient pharmacists through an electronic health record. To evaluate the effect of the PHIMAP intervention on unplanned 30-day same-hospital readmissions among Medicare Advantage patients. Those included were patients admitted to a large urban academic medical center between May 2018 and March 2020 who had a Medicare Advantage plan and were aged at least 18 years. A 2-group, quasi-experimental design was utilized. Control patients received the usual care, which included a best possible medication history and a postdischarge phone call. A multivariable logistic regression model was estimated to predict unplanned 30-day same-hospital readmissions. This study was a Hypothesis Evaluating Treatment Effectiveness study. In total, 884 patients were included. The majority were White (59.0%), non-Hispanic (87.7%), English speaking (90.5%), and older adults (median age, 75 years; interquartile range, 70-83 years). We detected no statistically significant association between the PHIMAP intervention and unplanned 30-day same-hospital readmissions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.56-1.52). After adjusting for patient demographics and clinical covariates, significant predictors of 30-day readmissions included the number of emergency department/inpatient visits within 180 days prior to index admission (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.11-1.77); discharge to a post-acute care facility, such as an inpatient rehabilitation facility, long-term acute care facility, or skilled nursing facility (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.06-2.66); hospital length of stay in days (OR = 1.04, 95% CI=1.01-1.07); and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01-1.02). Significant predictors of readmissions among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were consistent with greater illness severity, including a recent history of prior hospital utilization, a discharge to post-acute care facility (vs home), a longer length of hospital stay, and a higher comorbidity burden. Although we detected no statistically significant association between PHIMAP and unplanned 30-day same-hospital readmissions, differences in study group assignment based on the day of hospital discharge (weekend vs weekday) was a noted limitation of this study. Future studies of inpatient pharmacist-led interventions should plan to minimize the risk of selection bias due to differences in the time of patient discharge. This study was supported in part by the National Institute on Aging under award number R01AG058911 (to Pevnick) and the UCLA Clinical Translational Science Institute (UL1 TR001881). The sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study, nor the writing of this report.
人群健康住院医疗保险优势药剂师(PHIMAP)干预是一种由药剂师主导的、过渡护理干预,旨在减少医疗保险优势受益人的医院再入院率。PHIMAP 包括住院药剂师参与跨学科查房、入院和出院药物核对、药剂师将出院药物送到床边、个性化的出院药物清单和咨询,以及通过电子健康记录与门诊药剂师沟通。为了评估 PHIMAP 干预对医疗保险优势患者 30 天内同一医院再入院的影响。纳入的患者为 2018 年 5 月至 2020 年 3 月期间在一家大型城市学术医疗中心住院的患者,他们有医疗保险优势计划,年龄至少 18 岁。采用了 2 组准实验设计。对照组患者接受常规护理,包括尽可能最好的药物史和出院后电话随访。使用多变量逻辑回归模型预测 30 天内同一医院的再入院。这是一项假设评估治疗效果的研究。共纳入 884 名患者。大多数是白人(59.0%)、非西班牙裔(87.7%)、英语(90.5%)和老年人(中位数年龄 75 岁;四分位距 70-83 岁)。我们没有发现 PHIMAP 干预与 30 天内同一医院的再入院之间存在统计学显著关联(优势比[OR] = 0.91,95%CI = 0.56-1.52)。在调整了患者人口统计学和临床协变量后,30 天内再入院的显著预测因素包括索引入院前 180 天内急诊/住院就诊次数(OR = 1.40,95%CI = 1.11-1.77);出院到康复机构,如住院康复机构、长期急性护理机构或熟练护理机构(OR = 1.69,95%CI = 1.06-2.66);住院天数(OR = 1.04,95%CI = 1.01-1.07);和医疗保健研究和质量机构 Elixhauser 合并症指数评分(OR = 1.01,95%CI = 1.01-1.02)。医疗保险优势受益人的再入院显著预测因素与更高的疾病严重程度一致,包括近期住院就诊史、出院到康复机构(而非家庭)、住院时间延长和更高的合并症负担。尽管我们没有发现 PHIMAP 与 30 天内同一医院的再入院之间存在统计学显著关联,但基于出院日(周末与工作日)的研究组分配差异是这项研究的一个显著局限性。未来的住院药剂师主导的干预研究应计划尽量减少由于患者出院时间不同而导致的选择偏差的风险。这项研究部分得到了美国国立卫生研究院 R01AG058911 号拨款(授予 Pevnick)和加州大学洛杉矶分校临床转化科学研究所(UL1 TR001881)的支持。赞助商在研究的设计和实施以及本报告的撰写方面没有任何作用。