Infectious Diseases Service and Institute of Microbiology, University Hospital of Lausanne and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clinic of Infectious Diseases, S'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
J Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 22;224(10):1631-1640. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab163.
Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is increasingly recognized as a life-threatening superinfection of severe respiratory viral infections, such as influenza. The pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to emerging SARS-CoV-2 rose concern about the eventuality of IPA complicating COVID-19 in intensive care unit patients. A variable incidence of such complication has been reported, which can be partly attributed to differences in diagnostic strategy and IPA definitions, and possibly local environmental/epidemiological factors. In this article, we discuss the similarities and differences between influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). Compared to IAPA, the majority of CAPA cases have been classified as putative rather than proven/probable IPA. Distinct physiopathology of influenza and COVID-19 may explain these discrepancies. Whether CAPA represents a distinct entity is still debatable and many questions remain unanswered, such as its actual incidence, the predisposing role of corticosteroids or immunomodulatory drugs, and the indications for antifungal therapy.
侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)越来越被认为是严重呼吸道病毒感染(如流感)的一种危及生命的超级感染。由新型 SARS-CoV-2 引起的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行引起了人们对 IPA 并发 COVID-19 重症监护病房患者的可能性的关注。这种并发症的发病率各不相同,这在一定程度上可归因于诊断策略和 IPA 定义的差异,以及可能的局部环境/流行病学因素。在本文中,我们讨论了流感相关肺曲霉病(IAPA)和 COVID-19 相关肺曲霉病(CAPA)之间的异同。与 IAPA 相比,大多数 CAPA 病例被归类为疑似而非确诊/可能的 IPA。流感和 COVID-19 的不同病理生理学可能解释了这些差异。CAPA 是否代表一种独特的实体仍存在争议,许多问题仍未得到解答,例如其实际发病率、皮质类固醇或免疫调节剂的诱发作用以及抗真菌治疗的指征。