East China University of Political Science and Law, Room B112, Yangyongman Building, No.555, Longyuan Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, 201620, China.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Oct;29(10):5611-5621. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06166-0. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
This study aims to evaluate the treatment effect of a mindfulness-based intervention for Chinese breast cancer patients across outcome domains, including symptom-related, psychosocial, and quality of life outcomes.
Following the Cochrane Systematic Review guideline, we searched across five electronic databases, reference lists of eligible studies, professional websites, and major academic journals in Chinese. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Vevea and Woods sensitivity analysis, and risk of bias was evaluated using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials and risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. A meta-analysis of Hedges' g was conducted using meta-regression with robust variance estimation.
Final analysis included a total of 45 controlled trials containing 286 effect size estimates. Across outcome domains, studies reported an overall large and statistically significant treatment effect, d = 0.921, 95% CI (0.805, 1.040), p < 0.001. Subgroup analyses of specific domains of outcome reported overall significant treatment effects for (1) symptom-related outcomes, d = 0.885, 95% CI (0.657, 1.110), p < 0.001; (2) psychosocial wellness outcomes, d = 0.984, 95% CI (0.879, 1.090), p < 0.001; and (3) quality of life, d = 0.990, 95% CI (0.776, 1.200), p < 0.001. Moderator analysis did not identify any significant moderator.
Chinese literature reported an overall statistically significant and large treatment effect of a mindfulness-based intervention for breast cancer patients in China. Except for physical symptom outcomes, e.g., nausea/vomiting and pain, a mindfulness-based intervention was effective across outcome domains among Chinese breast cancer patients.
本研究旨在评估正念干预对中国乳腺癌患者在症状相关、心理社会和生活质量等多个结局领域的治疗效果。
根据 Cochrane 系统评价指南,我们在五个电子数据库、合格研究的参考文献列表、专业网站和中文主要学术期刊中进行了检索。使用漏斗图和 Vevea 和 Woods 敏感性分析评估发表偏倚,并使用改良 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚工具和干预非随机研究的偏倚风险评估风险偏倚。使用稳健方差估计的荟萃回归进行 Hedges'g 的荟萃分析。
最终分析共纳入 45 项对照试验,包含 286 个效应量估计值。在所有结局领域,研究报告了总体上较大且具有统计学意义的治疗效果,d = 0.921,95%CI(0.805,1.040),p < 0.001。特定结局领域的亚组分析报告了总体上显著的治疗效果:(1)症状相关结局,d = 0.885,95%CI(0.657,1.110),p < 0.001;(2)心理社会健康结局,d = 0.984,95%CI(0.879,1.090),p < 0.001;和(3)生活质量,d = 0.990,95%CI(0.776,1.200),p < 0.001。调节分析未发现任何显著的调节因素。
中国文献报告了正念干预对中国乳腺癌患者的总体上具有统计学意义和较大的治疗效果。除了身体症状结局,如恶心/呕吐和疼痛外,正念干预对中国乳腺癌患者在多个结局领域均有效。