Department of Environment and Health (E&H), Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
WEPAL-QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Studies, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 8005, NL-6700 EC Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 10;772:145071. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145071. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
To survey the conformity and quality of results among laboratories for microplastics determination worldwide, an international laboratory intercomparison and development exercise was organized. The 34 participants were requested to determine the polymer type and number or mass of polymer particles in 12 samples, i.e. six samples containing of pre-production pellets, five dissolvable soda tablets containing different (smaller) polymer particles and one blank soda tablet. A novel method for providing the test materials in aluminium strips was used. Thirty laboratories (88%) submitted data using their own method of choice, resulting in a variety of identification and quantification methods (n = 7). The majority of the labs (53-100%) correctly identified the type of polymer in all samples but one. The performance of the laboratories in quantifying and weighing the pellets was very good. The analysis of the number of the particles in the soda tablets varied considerably between laboratories (29-91%). The results of this study highlight the complexity of microplastics analysis and the need for harmonization of both reporting format and methods. Continued development and assessment of the comparability among analytical methods and laboratories are urgently needed to support monitoring programmes, research and decision-making.
为了调查全球范围内用于微塑料检测的实验室结果的一致性和质量,组织了一次国际实验室间比对和开发活动。34 名参与者被要求确定 12 个样品中的聚合物类型和聚合物颗粒的数量或质量,即 6 个含有预生产颗粒的样品、5 个含有不同(较小)聚合物颗粒的可溶解苏打片剂和 1 个空白苏打片剂。使用了一种新颖的方法将测试材料提供在铝带中。30 个实验室(88%)使用自己选择的方法提交了数据,导致出现了各种鉴定和定量方法(n=7)。大多数实验室(53%-100%)正确识别了所有样品中的聚合物类型,但有一个除外。实验室在定量和称重颗粒方面的表现非常好。对苏打片剂中颗粒数量的分析在实验室之间差异很大(29%-91%)。本研究的结果强调了微塑料分析的复杂性,以及需要协调报告格式和方法。迫切需要继续开发和评估分析方法和实验室之间的可比性,以支持监测计划、研究和决策。