Zsido Andras N, Varadi-Borbas Brigitta, Arato Nikolett
Institute of Psychology, University of Pécs, 6, Ifjusag street, Pécs, Baranya, H-7624, Hungary.
Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 26;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03174-6.
Although social anxiety disorder is one of the most frequent disorders, it often remained unrecognized. Utilizing brief, yet reliable screening tools, such as the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS-6) and the Social Phobia Scale (SPS-6) are helping to solve this problem in parts of Western Europe and the US. Still some countries, like Hungary, lag behind. For this purpose, previous studies call for further evidence on the applicability of the scales in various populations and cultures, as well as the elaborative validity of the short forms. Here, we aimed to provide a thorough analysis of the scales in five studies. We employed item response theory (IRT) to explore the psychometric properties of the SIAS-6 and the SPS-6 in Hungarian adults (n = 3213, age range:19-80) and adolescents (n = 292, age range:14-18).
In both samples, IRT analyses demonstrated that the items of SIAS-6 and SPS-6 had high discriminative power and cover a wide range of the latent trait. Using various subsamples, we showed that (1) the scales had excellent convergent and divergent validity in relation to domains of anxiety, depression, and cognitive emotion regulation in both samples. Further, that (2) the scales discriminated those with a history of fainting or avoidance from those without such history. Lastly, (3) the questionnaires can discriminate people diagnosed with social anxiety disorder (n = 30, age range:13-71) and controls.
These findings suggest that the questionnaires are suitable for screening for SAD in adults and adolescents. Although the confirmation of the two-factor structure may be indicative of the validity of the "performance only" specifier of SAD in DSM-V, the high correlation between the factors and the similar patter of convergent validity might indicate that it is not a discrete entity but rather a part of SAD; and that SAD is latently continuous.
尽管社交焦虑障碍是最常见的疾病之一,但它常常未被识别。使用简短但可靠的筛查工具,如社交互动焦虑量表(SIAS - 6)和社交恐惧症量表(SPS - 6),正在帮助西欧部分地区和美国解决这一问题。然而,仍有一些国家,如匈牙利,滞后于此。为此,先前的研究呼吁进一步提供关于这些量表在不同人群和文化中的适用性以及简版量表的详细效度的证据。在此,我们旨在对五项研究中的这些量表进行全面分析。我们采用项目反应理论(IRT)来探索匈牙利成年人(n = 3213,年龄范围:19 - 80岁)和青少年(n = 292,年龄范围:14 - 18岁)中SIAS - 6和SPS - 6的心理测量特性。
在两个样本中,IRT分析表明,SIAS - 6和SPS - 6的项目具有较高的区分度,并且涵盖了广泛的潜在特质范围。通过使用各种子样本,我们表明:(1)在两个样本中,这些量表在焦虑、抑郁和认知情绪调节领域具有出色的收敛效度和区分效度。此外,(2)这些量表能够区分有昏厥或回避史的人与无此类病史的人。最后,(3)这些问卷能够区分被诊断为社交焦虑障碍的人(n = 30,年龄范围:13 - 71岁)和对照组。
这些发现表明,这些问卷适用于筛查成年人和青少年的社交焦虑障碍。尽管双因素结构的确认可能表明《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中社交焦虑障碍“仅表现型”说明符的效度,但各因素之间的高相关性以及收敛效度的相似模式可能表明它不是一个离散的实体,而是社交焦虑障碍的一部分;并且社交焦虑障碍在潜在层面上是连续的。