• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同简版社交互动焦虑量表在中国大学生中的心理测量学特性

Psychometric Properties of Different Short Forms of Social Interaction Anxiety Scale in Chinese College Students.

作者信息

Song Qian, Zheng Kaili, Ding Zixia, Miao Zhengmiao, Liu Zhaoxia, Cheng Ming, Yi Jinyao

机构信息

Medical Psychological Center, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.

Medical Psychological Institute, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Oct 3;17:3405-3418. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S486245. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S486245
PMID:39376734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11457766/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There exist four short forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS): 10-item version (SIAS-10), 6-item version by Peters et al (SIAS-6P), 6-item version by Fergus et al (SIAS-6F), and 5-item version (SIAS-5). This study aims to comprehensively examine the psychometric properties of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, and SIAS-5 and to determine which one performs relatively better in Chinese population.

METHODS

This study enrolled 733 Chinese college students. The unidimensionality of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, SIAS-5 was examined using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Multi-Group CFA was further adopted to assess measurement equivalence across gender. Internal consistency reliability and criteria-related validity were also evaluated. Additionally, the measurement performance of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, and SIAS-5 was assessed with Item Response Theory (IRT), which estimated the discrimination parameter and the Item Characteristic Curve (ICC) for each item.

RESULTS

Except for the SIAS-5, the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, and SIAS-6F displayed a good-fit to the one-factor model. Furthermore, the SIAS-10 achieved strict equivalence across gender while other versions did not. The SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F and SIAS-5 all had acceptable internal consistency and significant correlations with criteria scales. The IRT results showed that the SIAS-10 included more items with higher discrimination and peaked ICCs (indicating more informative), whereas the SIAS-6P included more items with lower discrimination and flat ICCs (indicating less informative).

CONCLUSION

For assessing social anxiety in Chinese under constrained conditions, the SIAS-10 is recommended to clinicians for it measuring equivalently across gender, reflecting the relevant criteria variables well, and discriminating various levels of social anxiety sensitively.

摘要

背景

社交互动焦虑量表(SIAS)有四种简版:10项版本(SIAS - 10)、彼得斯等人的6项版本(SIAS - 6P)、弗格斯等人的6项版本(SIAS - 6F)以及5项版本(SIAS - 5)。本研究旨在全面检验SIAS - 10、SIAS - 6P、SIAS - 6F和SIAS - 5的心理测量特性,并确定哪一个在中国人群中表现相对更好。

方法

本研究招募了733名中国大学生。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)检验SIAS - 10、SIAS - 6P、SIAS - 6F、SIAS - 5的单维性。进一步采用多组CFA评估性别间的测量等效性。还评估了内部一致性信度和标准关联效度。此外,用项目反应理论(IRT)评估SIAS - 10、SIAS - 6P、SIAS - 6F和SIAS - 5的测量性能,该理论估计了每个项目的区分参数和项目特征曲线(ICC)。

结果

除SIAS - 5外,SIAS - 10、SIAS - 6P和SIAS - 6F与单因素模型拟合良好。此外,SIAS - 10在性别间实现了严格等效,而其他版本未实现。SIAS - 10、SIAS - 6P、SIAS - 6F和SIAS - 5均具有可接受的内部一致性,且与标准量表有显著相关性。IRT结果表明,SIAS - 10包含更多具有较高区分度和峰值ICC的项目(表明信息量更大),而SIAS - 6P包含更多具有较低区分度和平坦ICC的项目(表明信息量较小)。

结论

在受限条件下评估中国人群的社交焦虑时,建议临床医生使用SIAS - 10,因为它在性别间测量等效,能很好地反映相关标准变量,并能敏感地区分不同程度的社交焦虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cce/11457766/61357016d1d3/PRBM-17-3405-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cce/11457766/d113290611f4/PRBM-17-3405-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cce/11457766/3677a5db62ba/PRBM-17-3405-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cce/11457766/61357016d1d3/PRBM-17-3405-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cce/11457766/d113290611f4/PRBM-17-3405-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cce/11457766/3677a5db62ba/PRBM-17-3405-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cce/11457766/61357016d1d3/PRBM-17-3405-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of Different Short Forms of Social Interaction Anxiety Scale in Chinese College Students.不同简版社交互动焦虑量表在中国大学生中的心理测量学特性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Oct 3;17:3405-3418. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S486245. eCollection 2024.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Short Forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale in a Chinese College Sample.社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐怖症量表简版在中国大学生样本中的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:2214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02214. eCollection 2020.
3
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
4
Validation of a Chinese Version of the Digital Stress Scale and Development of a Short Form Based on Item Response Theory Among Chinese College Students.中文版数字压力量表的验证及基于项目反应理论的中国大学生简版量表的编制
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jul 31;16:2897-2911. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S413162. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparing short forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale.比较社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐惧症量表的简化版。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1116-26. doi: 10.1037/a0037063. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
6
The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) and the Social Phobia Scale (SPS): a comparison of two short-form versions.社交互动焦虑量表(SIAS)与社交恐惧症量表(SPS):两种简版的比较
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1281-1291. doi: 10.1037/a0037313. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of social anxiety scale for social media users and cross-sectional investigation into this disorder among college students.社交媒体用户社交焦虑量表中文版的心理测量学评估及大学生该障碍横断面调查。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;116:152328. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152328. Epub 2022 May 21.
8
Psychometric Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Simplified Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale: Cross-Sectional Study.《简化版电子健康素养量表的心理测量学验证和文化适应性:横断面研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 7;22(12):e18613. doi: 10.2196/18613.
9
Clinical validation of a non-heteronormative version of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS).社会交往焦虑量表(SIAS)非异性恋版本的临床验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Dec 19;11:209. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-209.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale in Medical Staff: Cross-sectional Study.医务人员中文版华威-爱丁堡心理健康量表的心理测量特性:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 30;24(11):e38108. doi: 10.2196/38108.

本文引用的文献

1
Vulnerabilities in social anxiety: Integrating intra- and interpersonal perspectives.社交焦虑的脆弱性:整合内部和人际视角。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Apr;109:102415. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102415. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Validation of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale in scleroderma: a Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort study.社交互动焦虑量表在硬皮病中的效度验证:一项以硬皮病患者为中心的干预网络队列研究。
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2018 Feb;3(1):98-105. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000264. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
3
Quality of Life and Clinical Correlates in Adults with Social Phobia: A Scoping Review.
社交恐惧症成年人的生活质量及临床相关因素:一项范围综述
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2021 Dec 22;17:224-234. doi: 10.2174/1745017902117010224. eCollection 2021.
4
Analysis of features of social anxiety and exploring the relationship between childhood major adverse experiences and social anxiety in early adulthood among Chinese college students.分析中国大学生社交焦虑的特征,并探讨其童年期重大不良经历与成年早期社交焦虑的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Sep 1;292:614-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.105. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
5
Item response theory analysis of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure.三因素精神变态量表的项目反应理论分析。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Aug;33(8):766-776. doi: 10.1037/pas0001022. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Psychometric properties of the social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale in Hungarian adults and adolescents.匈牙利成年人和青少年社交互动焦虑量表与社交恐惧症量表的心理测量特性
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 26;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03174-6.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Short Forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale in a Chinese College Sample.社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐怖症量表简版在中国大学生样本中的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:2214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02214. eCollection 2020.
8
Factor Structure and Gender Invariance of Chinese Version State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) in University Students.中文版状态-特质焦虑量表(Y型)在大学生中的因子结构与性别不变性
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 8;11:2228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02228. eCollection 2020.
9
Interpersonal problems in social anxiety disorder across different relational contexts.社交焦虑障碍在不同人际关系背景下的人际问题。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Oct;75:102275. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102275. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
10
Insecure attachment and maladaptive emotion regulation mediating the relationship between childhood trauma and borderline personality features.不安全依恋和适应不良的情绪调节中介了童年创伤与边缘型人格特征之间的关系。
Depress Anxiety. 2021 Jan;38(1):28-39. doi: 10.1002/da.23082. Epub 2020 Jul 27.