• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对兴奋剂使用者的 4 周与 16 周心理社会治疗的随机比较。

A randomized comparison of 4 vs. 16 weeks of psychosocial treatment for stimulant users.

机构信息

Vermont Center for Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401, United States of America.

Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 May;124:108274. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108274. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108274
PMID:33771278
Abstract

Controlled studies provide little empirical evidence to inform clinical recommendations for the optimal duration (i.e., "dosage") of psychosocial treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). The current study prospectively examined the relationships among treatment dosage, participant adherence to the treatment regimen, and treatment outcomes in a population of adults with stimulant use disorder (cocaine and/or methamphetamine). The study randomly assigned eighty-five participants to receive either 4 weeks or 16 weeks of standardized outpatient treatment. The treatment consisted of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and content covered was identical for each condition; only the planned duration of participation differed. Although both groups reduced stimulant use over time, participants in the 16-week condition were significantly more likely than those in the 4-week condition to provide stimulantnegative urine specimens 26 and 52 weeks following randomization. Participant adherence to treatment correlated significantly with drug-use outcomes: we observed a greater likelihood of stimulant-negative urine tests among those who completed treatment, irrespective of group assignment. Both the number of sessions attended and the percentage of prescribed sessions attended were associated with reductions in stimulant-use frequency 26 and 52 weeks after admission.

摘要

对照研究几乎没有提供实证证据来为物质使用障碍(SUD)的最佳治疗时长(即“剂量”)提供临床建议。本研究前瞻性地检查了接受兴奋剂使用障碍(可卡因和/或甲基苯丙胺)的成年人人群中治疗剂量、参与者对治疗方案的坚持程度和治疗结果之间的关系。研究将 85 名参与者随机分配到接受 4 周或 16 周标准化门诊治疗。治疗包括认知行为疗法(CBT),每个条件涵盖的内容都相同;仅参与计划的持续时间不同。尽管两组参与者的兴奋剂使用都随时间减少,但在随机分组后 26 周和 52 周时,16 周组的参与者提供兴奋剂阴性尿液样本的可能性明显高于 4 周组。参与者对治疗的坚持与药物使用结果显著相关:我们观察到,无论分组如何,完成治疗的参与者尿液中兴奋剂检测呈阴性的可能性更大。治疗后 26 周和 52 周,参加的治疗次数和规定治疗次数的百分比与兴奋剂使用频率的降低相关。

相似文献

1
A randomized comparison of 4 vs. 16 weeks of psychosocial treatment for stimulant users.一项针对兴奋剂使用者的 4 周与 16 周心理社会治疗的随机比较。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 May;124:108274. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108274. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
2
Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study.基于奖励的激励措施对门诊心理社会治疗项目中兴奋剂滥用者治疗效果的影响:一项国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;62(10):1148-56. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.10.1148.
3
Reduced drug use as an alternative valid outcome in individuals with stimulant use disorders: Findings from 13 multisite randomized clinical trials.减少药物使用作为兴奋剂使用障碍个体的另一种有效结局:来自 13 个多中心随机临床试验的结果。
Addiction. 2024 May;119(5):833-843. doi: 10.1111/add.16409. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
Predictors of 12-Step Attendance and Participation for Individuals With Stimulant Use Disorders.兴奋剂使用障碍患者12步戒酒互助会出勤和参与情况的预测因素
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Sep;68:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches for stimulant-dependent individuals.针对兴奋剂依赖个体的应急管理与认知行为疗法比较。
Addiction. 2006 Feb;101(2):267-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01312.x.
6
LiMA: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence.LiMA:一项关于赖氨酸右旋苯丙胺治疗甲基苯丙胺依赖的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 19;8(7):e020723. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020723.
7
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of modafinil for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence.随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验莫达非尼治疗甲基苯丙胺依赖。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jun 1;109(1-3):20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.023. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
8
Stimulant abuse treatment as HIV prevention.将兴奋剂滥用治疗作为艾滋病预防手段。
J Addict Dis. 1998;17(4):19-32. doi: 10.1300/J069v17n04_03.
9
Efficacy of a behavioral intervention for increasing safer sex behaviors in HIV-negative, heterosexual methamphetamine users: results from the Fast-Lane Study.一项行为干预措施对增加HIV阴性异性恋甲基苯丙胺使用者安全性行为的效果:快车道研究结果
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;34(3):263-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02874551.
10
Behavioral treatment approaches for methamphetamine dependence and HIV-related sexual risk behaviors among urban gay and bisexual men.针对城市男同性恋者和双性恋男性中甲基苯丙胺成瘾及与艾滋病相关的性风险行为的行为治疗方法。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 May 9;78(2):125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.10.004. Epub 2004 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Project RETAIN: Providing Integrated Care for People With HIV Who Use Cocaine.RETAIN项目:为使用可卡因的艾滋病毒感染者提供综合护理。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 3;12(4):ofaf104. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf104. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder.兴奋剂使用障碍的心理社会干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 15;2(2):CD011866. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011866.pub3.
3
Substance use referral, treatment utilization, and patient costs associated with problematic substance use in people living with HIV in Cape Town, South Africa.
南非开普敦艾滋病毒感染者中与物质使用问题相关的物质使用转诊、治疗利用及患者费用
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Feb 26;2:100035. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100035. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Providing substance use disorder treatment in correctional settings: knowledge gaps and proposed research priorities-overview and commentary.在惩教环境中提供药物使用障碍治疗:知识差距和拟议的研究重点——概述和评论。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022 Dec 8;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00351-0.
5
Retention in treatment and therapeutic adherence: How are these associated with therapeutic success? An analysis using real-world data.治疗中的保留和治疗依从性:这些与治疗成功有何关联?使用真实世界数据进行的分析。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2022 Dec;31(4):e1929. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1929. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
6
Goofballing of Opioid and Methamphetamine: The Science Behind the Deadly Cocktail.阿片类药物与甲基苯丙胺的“瞎搞”:致命混合物背后的科学
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 7;13:859563. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.859563. eCollection 2022.