Shulman Matisyahu, Choo Tse-Hwei, Scodes Jennifer, Pavlicova Martina, Wai Jonathan, Haenlein Patrick, Tofighi Babak, Campbell Aimee N C, Lee Joshua D, Rotrosen John, Nunes Edward V
New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, United States of America.
New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States of America.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 May;124:108292. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108292. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) is an effective maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder, but induction from active opioid use is a challenge as individuals must complete detoxification before induction. We aimed to determine whether use of methadone or buprenorphine, long acting agonist opioids commonly used for detoxification, were associated with decreased likelihood of induction onto XR-NTX.
We performed a secondary analysis of a large open-label randomized trial of buprenorphine versus XR-NTX for treatment of individuals with opioid use disorder recruited from eight short term residential (detoxification) units. This analysis only included individuals randomized to the XR-NTX arm of the trial (N = 283). The method of detoxification varied according to usual practices at each inpatient program. Logistic regression models estimating the log-odds of induction onto XR-NTX were fit, with detoxification regimen received as the predictor.
In the unadjusted logistic regression model, detoxification drug received (either methadone or buprenorphine) was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of induction onto XR-NTX compared to receiving non-opioid detoxification (Overall: P < 0.001); buprenorphine vs non-opioid detoxification: OR (95% CI) = 0.32 (0.15-0.67); methadone vs non-opioid detoxification: OR (95% CI) = 0.23 (0.11-0.46). After controlling for site as a random effect, the association of detoxification drug with induction success lost statistical significance.
Use of agonist medication during detoxification was associated with XR-NTX induction failure. Medication choice was determined by each site's clinical practice and therefore this association could not be separated from other site level variables.
NCT02032433.
缓释纳曲酮(XR-NTX)是治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的一种有效维持疗法,但从正在使用阿片类药物转为使用该疗法存在挑战,因为个体在开始治疗前必须完成脱毒。我们旨在确定使用美沙酮或丁丙诺啡(常用于脱毒的长效阿片类激动剂)是否与开始使用XR-NTX的可能性降低有关。
我们对一项大型开放标签随机试验进行了二次分析,该试验比较了丁丙诺啡与XR-NTX对从8个短期住院(脱毒)机构招募的阿片类药物使用障碍患者的治疗效果。该分析仅纳入了随机分配至试验中XR-NTX组的个体(N = 283)。脱毒方法根据每个住院项目的常规做法而有所不同。拟合了估计开始使用XR-NTX的对数几率的逻辑回归模型,将接受的脱毒方案作为预测变量。
在未调整的逻辑回归模型中,与接受非阿片类药物脱毒相比,接受的脱毒药物(美沙酮或丁丙诺啡)与开始使用XR-NTX的可能性降低显著相关(总体:P < 0.001);丁丙诺啡与非阿片类药物脱毒相比:OR(95%CI)= 0.32(0.15 - 0.67);美沙酮与非阿片类药物脱毒相比:OR(95%CI)= 0.23(0.11 - 0.46)。在将研究地点作为随机效应进行控制后,脱毒药物与诱导成功之间的关联失去了统计学意义。
脱毒期间使用激动剂药物与XR-NTX诱导失败有关。药物选择由每个研究地点的临床实践决定,因此这种关联无法与其他地点层面的变量区分开来。
NCT02032433。