Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China.
Medical ICU, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing, 100730, China.
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 26;11(1):6969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86342-8.
Treatment of ventilated patients with gram-negative pneumonia (GNP) is often unsuccessful. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nebulized amikacin (NA) as adjunctive therapy to systemic antibiotics in this patient population. PubMed, Embase, China national knowledge infrastructure, Wanfang, and the Cochrane database were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of NA as adjunctive therapy in ventilated adult patients with GNP. Heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. The Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Thirteen RCTs with 1733 adults were included. The pooled results showed NA had better microbiologic eradication (RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.69, P < 0.0001) and improved clinical response (RR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.34; P < 0.0001) when compared with control. Meanwhile, overall mortality, pneumonia associated mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU and change of clinical pneumonia infection scores were similar between NA and control groups. Additionally, NA did not add significant nephrotoxicity while could cause more bronchospasm. The use of NA adjunctive to systemic antibiotics therapy showed better benefits in ventilated patients with GNP. More well-designed RCTs are still needed to confirm our results.
治疗革兰氏阴性菌肺炎(GNP)的机械通气患者通常效果不佳。我们旨在评估雾化氨基糖苷(NA)作为辅助全身抗生素治疗在该患者人群中的疗效和安全性。我们在 PubMed、Embase、中国国家知识基础设施、万方和 Cochrane 数据库中搜索了关于 NA 作为辅助治疗革兰氏阴性菌肺炎机械通气成年患者的疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用亚组分析和敏感性分析探索异质性。使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法(GRADE)评估证据的确定性。纳入了 13 项 RCT,共 1733 名成年人。汇总结果表明,与对照组相比,NA 具有更好的微生物清除效果(RR=1.51,95%CI 1.35-1.69,P<0.0001)和临床反应改善(RR=1.23;95%CI 1.13-1.34;P<0.0001)。同时,NA 组与对照组的总死亡率、肺炎相关死亡率、机械通气时间、ICU 住院时间和临床肺炎感染评分的变化无显著差异。此外,NA 不会导致明显的肾毒性,但可能会引起更多的支气管痉挛。NA 联合全身抗生素治疗在治疗革兰氏阴性菌肺炎的机械通气患者中具有更好的疗效。仍需要更多设计良好的 RCT 来证实我们的结果。