Suppr超能文献

预防性雾化吸入抗生素对预防重症监护病房获得性肺炎的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of prophylactic nebulized antibiotics on the prevention of ICU-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gao Ming, Yu Xiaoxu, Liu Xiaoxuan, Xu Yuan, Zhou Hua, Zhu Yan

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Dec 13;12:e18686. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18686. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic nebulized antibiotics in preventing intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the potential reduction in the incidence of ICU-acquired pneumonia through prophylactic nebulized antibiotics were collected by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to January 23, 2024. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ICU-acquired pneumonia, while the secondary endpoints included mortality, length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation days, and nebulization-related side effects. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 14.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs were included in the analysis, involving 1,287 patients (636 patients in the study group received prophylactic antibiotic therapy, including Polymyxin B, Tobramycin, Ceftazidime, Colistimethate sodium, and amikacin; 651 patients in the control group primarily received saline). The results indicated that prophylactic nebulized antibiotic therapy significantly reduced the incidence of ICU-acquired pneumonia compared to that in the control group (odds ratio (OR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.43-0.74], < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in the mortality rate between the treatment and control groups (OR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.68-1.10], = 0.24). Prophylactic nebulized antibiotic therapy also did not significantly reduce the length of ICU stay (MD = 0.2 days; 95% CI [-0.81 to 1.20], = 0.70) or the number of mechanical ventilation days (MD = 0.43 days; 95% CI [-0.47 to 1.33], = 0.35). Additionally, there was no evidence that prophylactic nebulized antibiotic therapy contributed to the development of multiple drug-resistant (MDR) bacterial pneumonia or increased the incidence of associated side effects, such as airway spasms.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that ICU-acquired pneumonia can be prevented by prophylactic nebulized antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients without increasing the risk of MDR bacterial infections or airway spasms. However, the reduction in the incidence of ICU-acquired pneumonia did not result in significant improvements in mortality or length of ICU stay.

摘要

目的

通过荟萃分析评估预防性雾化吸入抗生素在预防重症监护病房(ICU)获得性肺炎方面的疗效和安全性。

方法

通过检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,收集自数据库建立至2024年1月23日期间研究预防性雾化吸入抗生素对降低ICU获得性肺炎发病率影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要终点是ICU获得性肺炎的发病率,次要终点包括死亡率、ICU住院时间、机械通气天数以及雾化相关副作用。使用RevMan 5.3和STATA 14.0软件进行统计分析。

结果

分析共纳入6项RCT,涉及1287例患者(研究组636例接受预防性抗生素治疗,包括多黏菌素B、妥布霉素、头孢他啶、黏菌素甲磺酸钠和阿米卡星;对照组651例主要接受生理盐水)。结果表明,与对照组相比,预防性雾化吸入抗生素治疗显著降低了ICU获得性肺炎的发病率(优势比(OR)=0.57,95%置信区间(CI)[0.43 - 0.74],P<0.0001)。治疗组和对照组的死亡率无显著差异(OR = 0.86,95% CI [0.68 - 1.10],P = 0.24)。预防性雾化吸入抗生素治疗也未显著缩短ICU住院时间(MD = 0.2天;95% CI [-0.81至1.20],P = 0.70)或减少机械通气天数(MD = 0.43天;95% CI [-0.47至1.33],P = 0.35)。此外,没有证据表明预防性雾化吸入抗生素治疗会导致多重耐药(MDR)细菌性肺炎的发生或增加相关副作用(如气道痉挛)的发生率。

结论

这项荟萃分析表明,预防性雾化吸入抗生素治疗可预防重症患者发生ICU获得性肺炎,且不会增加MDR细菌感染或气道痉挛的风险。然而,ICU获得性肺炎发病率的降低并未显著改善死亡率或缩短ICU住院时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96dd/11648687/b3546379f66a/peerj-12-18686-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验