• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 BabySeq 项目中,传统新生儿筛查与基因组测序结果不一致。

Discordant results between conventional newborn screening and genomic sequencing in the BabySeq Project.

机构信息

Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2021 Jul;23(7):1372-1375. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01146-5. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-021-01146-5
PMID:33772220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8263473/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Newborn screening (NBS) is performed to identify neonates at risk for actionable, severe, early-onset disorders, many of which are genetic. The BabySeq Project randomized neonates to receive conventional NBS or NBS plus exome sequencing (ES) capable of detecting sequence variants that may also diagnose monogenic disease or indicate genetic disease risk. We therefore evaluated how ES and conventional NBS results differ in this population.

METHODS

We compared results of NBS (including hearing screens) and ES for 159 infants in the BabySeq Project. Infants were considered "NBS positive" if any abnormal result was found indicating disease risk and "ES positive" if ES identified a monogenic disease risk or a genetic diagnosis.

RESULTS

Most infants (132/159, 84%) were NBS and ES negative. Only one infant was positive for the same disorder by both modalities. Nine infants were NBS positive/ES negative, though seven of these were subsequently determined to be false positives. Fifteen infants were ES positive/NBS negative, all of which represented risk of genetic conditions that are not included in NBS programs. No genetic explanation was identified for eight infants referred on the hearing screen.

CONCLUSION

These differences highlight the complementarity of information that may be gleaned from NBS and ES in the newborn period.

摘要

目的

新生儿筛查(NBS)用于识别有风险的新生儿,这些新生儿患有可治疗的严重早发性疾病,其中许多是遗传性的。BabySeq 项目将新生儿随机分为接受常规 NBS 或 NBS 加外显子组测序(ES),后者能够检测可能诊断单基因疾病或指示遗传疾病风险的序列变异。因此,我们评估了 ES 和常规 NBS 在该人群中的结果有何不同。

方法

我们比较了 159 名参与 BabySeq 项目的婴儿的 NBS(包括听力筛查)和 ES 结果。如果任何异常结果表明存在疾病风险,则将婴儿视为“NBS 阳性”,如果 ES 确定存在单基因疾病风险或遗传诊断,则将婴儿视为“ES 阳性”。

结果

大多数婴儿(132/159,84%)NBS 和 ES 均为阴性。只有一名婴儿同时通过两种方式检测出同一疾病。9 名婴儿 NBS 阳性/ES 阴性,但其中 7 名被确定为假阳性。15 名婴儿 ES 阳性/NBS 阴性,均代表不包括在 NBS 计划中的遗传状况的风险。在听力筛查中,有 8 名婴儿被转诊,但没有确定遗传原因。

结论

这些差异突出了新生儿期从 NBS 和 ES 中获取的信息的互补性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9320/8263473/bf25998a7801/nihms-1688775-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9320/8263473/bf25998a7801/nihms-1688775-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9320/8263473/bf25998a7801/nihms-1688775-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Discordant results between conventional newborn screening and genomic sequencing in the BabySeq Project.在 BabySeq 项目中,传统新生儿筛查与基因组测序结果不一致。
Genet Med. 2021 Jul;23(7):1372-1375. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01146-5. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Sequencing from dried blood spots in infants with "false positive" newborn screen for MCAD deficiency.从“假阳性”新生儿 MCAD 缺乏症筛查的干血斑中进行测序。
Mol Genet Metab. 2013 Jan;108(1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
3
Genomic Sequencing for Newborn Screening: Results of the NC NEXUS Project.新生儿筛查中的基因组测序:NC NEXUS 项目的结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Oct 1;107(4):596-611. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
4
Implementation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Constitutional Newborn Screening in High-Risk Neonates.高危新生儿的靶向新一代测序基因筛查的实施。
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Nov;60(11):1061-1066. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.11.1061.
5
Interpretation of Genomic Sequencing Results in Healthy and Ill Newborns: Results from the BabySeq Project.健康和患病新生儿基因组测序结果解读:BabySeq 项目的结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan 3;104(1):76-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.016.
6
Actionability of unanticipated monogenic disease risks in newborn genomic screening: Findings from the BabySeq Project.新生儿基因组筛查中未预料到的单基因疾病风险的可操作性:BabySeq 项目的研究结果。
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Jul 6;110(7):1034-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
7
Evaluating parents' decisions about next-generation sequencing for their child in the NC NEXUS (North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening) study: a randomized controlled trial protocol.在北卡罗来纳州新生儿外显子测序通用筛查(NC NEXUS)研究中评估父母为其子女进行下一代测序的决策:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2018 Jun 28;19(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2686-4.
8
The BabySeq project: implementing genomic sequencing in newborns.婴儿测序项目:在新生儿中实施基因组测序
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1200-1.
9
Psychosocial Effect of Newborn Genomic Sequencing on Families in the BabySeq Project: A Randomized Clinical Trial.新生儿基因组测序对 BabySeq 项目家庭的心理社会影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Nov 1;175(11):1132-1141. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2829.
10
Parental Attitudes Toward Standard Newborn Screening and Newborn Genomic Sequencing: Findings From the BabySeq Study.父母对标准新生儿筛查和新生儿基因组测序的态度:来自BabySeq研究的结果。
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 27;13:867371. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867371. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs.全球基因组新生儿筛查计划中基于数据对遗传疾病的考量。
Genet Med. 2025 Jul;27(7):101443. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2025.101443. Epub 2025 May 9.
2
Holistic precision wellness: Paving the way for next-generation precision medicine (ngPM) with AI, biomedical informatics, and clinical medicine.整体精准健康:借助人工智能、生物医学信息学和临床医学为下一代精准医学(ngPM)铺平道路。
FASEB Bioadv. 2025 Mar 3;7(4):e70005. doi: 10.1096/fba.2024-00198. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Tandem mass spectrometry in screening for inborn errors of metabolism: comprehensive bibliometric analysis.
串联质谱法在先天性代谢缺陷筛查中的应用:综合文献计量分析
Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 20;13:1463294. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1463294. eCollection 2025.
4
Screening for Hearing Impairment in Newborns Using Targeted Genomic Sequencing: A Large Pilot Cohort Study.使用靶向基因组测序对新生儿听力障碍进行筛查:一项大型试点队列研究。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May;18(2):152-161. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2024.00275. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
5
Establishment and evaluation of a method for measuring ornithine transcarbamylase activity in micro blood of neonates.新生儿微量血鸟氨酸转氨甲酰酶活性测定方法的建立与评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03529-2.
6
Family genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing in the BabySeq project.“宝宝序列计划”中的家族遗传风险沟通与反向级联检测
Genet Med. 2025 Mar;27(3):101350. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101350. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
7
Estimating the sensitivity of genomic newborn screening for treatable inherited metabolic disorders.评估基因组新生儿筛查对可治疗的遗传性代谢疾病的敏感性。
Genet Med. 2025 Jan;27(1):101284. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101284. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
8
Perceptions of genomic newborn screening: a cross-sectional survey conducted with UK medical students.基因组新生儿筛查的认知:一项在英国医学生中开展的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 24;14(9):e089108. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089108.
9
The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants.婴儿测序计划:对不同种族婴儿进行基因组测序的临床试验。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 3;111(10):2094-2106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
10
Genomic Newborn Screening for Pediatric Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: A Holistic Approach.用于儿童癌症易感综合征的基因组新生儿筛查:一种整体方法。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 26;16(11):2017. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112017.