• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs.全球基因组新生儿筛查计划中基于数据对遗传疾病的考量。
Genet Med. 2025 Jul;27(7):101443. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2025.101443. Epub 2025 May 9.
2
Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs.全球基因组新生儿筛查项目中基于数据驱动的遗传疾病考量
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 25:2024.03.24.24304797. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.24.24304797.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
7
Disclosing to parents newborn carrier status identified by routine blood spot screening.向父母披露通过常规血斑筛查确定的新生儿携带者状态。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD003859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003859.pub2.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and clinical utility of expanded genomic newborn screening in the Early Check program.早期筛查项目中扩展基因组新生儿筛查的可行性及临床应用价值
Nat Med. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03945-8.
2
TREAT: systematic and inclusive selection process of genes for genomic newborn screening as part of the Screen4Care project.TREAT:作为Screen4Care项目的一部分,用于基因组新生儿筛查的基因的系统且全面的选择过程。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 May 15;20(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03692-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic counselors' perspectives on genomic screening of apparently healthy newborns in the United States.美国遗传咨询师对健康新生儿进行基因组筛查的看法。
Genet Med Open. 2024 Aug 7;2:101885. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101885. eCollection 2024.
2
Preferences of parents from diverse backgrounds on genomic screening of apparently healthy newborns.不同背景的父母对健康新生儿进行基因组筛查的偏好。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1994. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1994. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Expanded Newborn Screening Using Genome Sequencing for Early Actionable Conditions.利用基因组测序进行扩展新生儿筛查以发现早期可采取行动的疾病。
JAMA. 2025 Jan 21;333(3):232-240. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.19662.
4
A systematic framework for selecting gene-condition pairs for inclusion in newborn sequencing panels: Early Check implementation.用于选择纳入新生儿测序面板的基因-疾病对的系统框架:早期检查实施
Genet Med. 2024 Dec;26(12):101290. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101290. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
5
The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants.婴儿测序计划:对不同种族婴儿进行基因组测序的临床试验。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 3;111(10):2094-2106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Exploring the benefits, harms and costs of genomic newborn screening for rare diseases.探索针对罕见病的基因组新生儿筛查的益处、危害和成本。
Nat Med. 2024 Jul;30(7):1823-1825. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03055-x.
7
Comparative analysis of gene and disease selection in genomic newborn screening studies.基因组新生儿筛查研究中基因和疾病选择的比较分析。
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2024 Sep;47(5):945-970. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12750. Epub 2024 May 16.
8
An Opportunity to Fill a Gap for Newborn Screening of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.填补新生儿神经发育障碍筛查空白的契机。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Apr 16;10(2):33. doi: 10.3390/ijns10020033.
9
Targeted exome sequencing strategy (NeoEXOME) for Chinese newborns using a pilot study with 3423 neonates.针对中国新生儿的靶向外显子组测序策略(NeoEXOME):一项针对 3423 名新生儿的试点研究。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024 Jan;12(1):e2357. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2357.
10
Gene selection for genomic newborn screening: Moving toward consensus?基因组新生儿筛查中的基因选择:是否正在达成共识?
Genet Med. 2024 May;26(5):101077. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101077. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

全球基因组新生儿筛查计划中基于数据对遗传疾病的考量。

Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs.

作者信息

Minten Thomas, Bick Sarah, Adelson Sophia, Gehlenborg Nils, Amendola Laura M, Boemer François, Coffey Alison J, Encina Nicolas, Ferlini Alessandra, Kirschner Janbernd, Russell Bianca E, Servais Laurent, Sund Kristen L, Taft Ryan J, Tsipouras Petros, Zouk Hana, Bick David, Green Robert C, Gold Nina B

机构信息

KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2025 Jul;27(7):101443. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2025.101443. Epub 2025 May 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2025.101443
PMID:40357684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12229768/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Over 30 international studies are exploring newborn sequencing (NBSeq) to expand the range of genetic disorders included in newborn screening. Substantial variability in gene selection across programs exists, highlighting the need for a systematic approach to prioritize genes.

METHODS

We assembled a data set comprising 25 characteristics about each of the 4390 genes included in 27 NBSeq programs. We used regression analysis to identify several predictors of inclusion and developed a machine learning model to rank genes for public health consideration.

RESULTS

Among 27 NBSeq programs, the number of genes analyzed ranged from 134 to 4299, with only 74 (1.7%) genes included by over 80% of programs. The most significant associations with gene inclusion across programs were presence on the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (inclusion increase of 74.7%, CI: 71.0%-78.4%), robust evidence on the natural history (29.5%, CI: 24.6%-34.4%), and treatment efficacy (17.0%, CI: 12.3%-21.7%) of the associated genetic disease. A boosted trees machine learning model using 13 predictors achieved high accuracy in predicting gene inclusion across programs (area under the curve = 0.915, R = 84%).

CONCLUSION

The machine learning model developed here provides a ranked list of genes that can adapt to emerging evidence and regional needs, enabling more consistent and informed gene selection in NBSeq initiatives.

摘要

目的

超过30项国际研究正在探索新生儿测序(NBSeq),以扩大新生儿筛查中包含的遗传疾病范围。各项目之间在基因选择上存在很大差异,这凸显了采用系统方法对基因进行优先级排序的必要性。

方法

我们收集了一个数据集,其中包含27个NBSeq项目中所涉及的4390个基因各自的25个特征。我们使用回归分析来确定几个入选的预测因素,并开发了一个机器学习模型,以便对基因进行排序,供公共卫生考虑。

结果

在27个NBSeq项目中,分析的基因数量从134个到4299个不等,只有74个(1.7%)基因被超过80%的项目纳入。各项目中与基因入选最显著相关的因素包括在美国推荐统一筛查小组中的存在情况(入选率提高74.7%,置信区间:71.0%-78.4%)、相关遗传疾病自然史的有力证据(29.5%,置信区间:24.6%-34.4%)以及治疗效果(17.0%,置信区间:12.3%-21.7%)。一个使用13个预测因素的增强树机器学习模型在预测各项目中的基因入选情况时达到了很高的准确率(曲线下面积 = 0.915,R = 84%)。

结论

此处开发的机器学习模型提供了一个基因排名列表,该列表能够适应新出现的证据和区域需求,从而在NBSeq计划中实现更一致、更明智的基因选择。