Division of Neonatology, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Jul;56(7):2067-2072. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25379. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
Our aim in this study was to assess the effect of the Predictive Intelligent Control of Oxygenation (PRICO ) system on cerebral (rSO C) and splanchnic (rSO S) oxygenation in a cohort of preterm infants with frequent desaturations.
Twenty infants with gestational age <32 weeks (n = 20) were assigned in random sequence to 12 h of automated or manual adjustment of FiO . Over this period, they were studied continuously by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).
We found that rSO C [68.0% (60.5%-74.7%) vs. 68.5% (62%-72%); p = .824] and rSO S [27.0% (17.3%-45.7%) vs. 27.0% (15%-53%); p = .878] were similar during automatic and manual control of FiO . Time spent with SpO 90%-95% was higher during the automatic than manual control of FiO , while time spent with SpO <80% or >95% was lower.
Automated control of FiO with PRICO system did not improve brain and splanchnic oxygenation in comparison with manual control in a cohort of preterm infants, but it significantly decreased SpO fluctuations and limited the duration of both hypoxemia and hyperoxemia.
本研究旨在评估氧合预测智能控制(PRICO)系统对伴有频繁血氧饱和度下降的早产儿脑(rSO₂C)和内脏(rSO₂S)氧合的影响。
将 20 名胎龄<32 周的婴儿(n=20)随机分为自动或手动调整 FiO₂组,在此期间,他们通过近红外光谱(NIRS)连续监测。
我们发现,在自动和手动 FiO₂控制下,rSO₂C[68.0%(60.5%-74.7%)与 68.5%(62%-72%);p=0.824]和 rSO₂S[27.0%(17.3%-45.7%)与 27.0%(15%-53%);p=0.878]相似。自动 FiO₂控制时 SpO₂90%-95%的时间高于手动控制,而 SpO₂<80%或>95%的时间较低。
与手动控制相比,PRICO 系统自动控制 FiO₂并未改善早产儿脑和内脏氧合,但其显著降低了 SpO₂波动,并限制了低氧血症和高氧血症的持续时间。