• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前多参数 MRI 和 PI-RADS 版本 2.0 鉴别前列腺穿刺活检中组织学良性前列腺疾病与前列腺癌:一项回顾性单中心比较研究。

Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and PI-RADS version 2.0 for differentiating histologically benign prostate disease from prostate cancer in biopsies: A retrospective single-center comparison.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Kocaeli University Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, Kocaeli University Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Imaging. 2021 Oct;78:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.03.011
PMID:33773450
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2.0 (PI-RADSv2.0) for differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) from benign prostate disease on prebiopsy multiparametric MRI stratified by total prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

150 patients who had prebiopsy mpMRI, serum PSA concentration and subsequent biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified by PSA concentration (Group1 ≥ 10 ng/mL; Group2 4.0-<10 ng/mL). MRI findings were assessed using PI-RADSv2.0 by two blinded radiologists. Lesions were graded histopathologically using the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score. Diagnostic performance of PI-RADSv2.0 was evaluated and compared to PSA and PSA Density (PSAD). The performance of the radiologists was compared including inter-observer agreement for PI-RADSv2.0. The correlation between imaging and histopathological biopsy results was analyzed.

RESULTS

The differences in total PSA, free/total PSA ratio and PSAD between benign (n = 78) and malignant (n = 72) groups were significant (p < 0.05). The PI-RADSv2.0 scores of the radiologists were strongly correlated (r = 0.912, p < 0.001) with excellent agreement, κ = 0.97 (95%CI: 0.90-1.03; p < 0.005). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed significantly high predictive power for PI-RADSv2.0, total PSA and PSAD alone. Comparison of age, prostate volume, PSAD, free/total PSA ratio and total PSA values between ISUP1 and ISUP ≥ 2 cases revealed significantly increased PSAD (p < 0.001) and total PSA (p = 0.001) in the ISUP ≥ 2 group.

CONCLUSION

PI-RADSv2.0 had high diagnostic accuracy in both PSA groups. PI-RADSv2.0, PSAD and total PSA alone had significant high predictive power to detect csPCa. However, the combination of PI-RADSv2.0 and PSAD or total PSA for each reader showed no statistically significant improvement when compared to PI-RADSv2.0 alone.

摘要

目的

探讨前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版(PI-RADSv2.0)在基于总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度的前列腺多参数 MRI 术前区分临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)和良性前列腺疾病的诊断性能。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 150 例接受过术前多参数 MRI、血清 PSA 浓度和随后活检的患者。根据 PSA 浓度(Group1≥10ng/mL;Group2 4.0-<10ng/mL)对患者进行分层。由两名盲法阅片医生使用 PI-RADSv2.0 评估 MRI 结果。使用国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)评分对病变进行组织病理学分级。评估 PI-RADSv2.0 的诊断性能,并与 PSA 和 PSA 密度(PSAD)进行比较。比较了不同观察者的 PI-RADSv2.0 表现,包括观察者间的一致性。分析了影像学和组织学活检结果之间的相关性。

结果

良性组(n=78)和恶性组(n=72)的总 PSA、游离/总 PSA 比值和 PSAD 差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。两位阅片医生的 PI-RADSv2.0 评分呈强相关(r=0.912,p<0.001),具有极好的一致性,κ=0.97(95%CI:0.90-1.03;p<0.005)。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,PI-RADSv2.0、总 PSA 和 PSAD 单独预测的能力显著较高。比较 ISUP1 与 ISUP≥2 病例的年龄、前列腺体积、PSAD、游离/总 PSA 比值和总 PSA 值,发现 ISUP≥2 组的 PSAD(p<0.001)和总 PSA(p=0.001)显著升高。

结论

PI-RADSv2.0 在 PSA 两组中均具有较高的诊断准确性。PI-RADSv2.0、PSAD 和总 PSA 单独对检测 csPCa 具有显著的高预测能力。然而,与 PI-RADSv2.0 相比,每位读者的 PI-RADSv2.0 与 PSAD 或总 PSA 的组合并未显示出统计学上的显著改善。

相似文献

1
Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and PI-RADS version 2.0 for differentiating histologically benign prostate disease from prostate cancer in biopsies: A retrospective single-center comparison.术前多参数 MRI 和 PI-RADS 版本 2.0 鉴别前列腺穿刺活检中组织学良性前列腺疾病与前列腺癌:一项回顾性单中心比较研究。
Clin Imaging. 2021 Oct;78:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
2
Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.比较不同 PSA 密度阈值在前列腺 MRI PI-RADSv2.1 分类中的风险分层。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20210886. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210886. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Combined Analysis of Biparametric MRI and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: Role in the Prebiopsy Diagnosis of Gleason Score 7 or Greater Prostate Cancer.双参数 MRI 与前列腺特异性抗原密度联合分析在前列腺癌 Gleason 评分 7 及以上的活检诊断中的作用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Sep;211(3):W166-W172. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19253. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
3-T Multiparametric MRI Followed by In-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检阴性后,3-T 多参数 MRI 引导下腔内活检用于检测临床显著前列腺癌。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Sep;215(3):660-666. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22455. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
5
MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.MRI 联合 PSA 密度在检测 PSA 血清水平为 4∼10ng/mL 的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:双参数与多参数 MRI。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Apr;101(4):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
Risk-Adapted Strategy Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density to Individualize Biopsy Decision in Patients With PI-RADS 3 ``Gray Zone'' Lesions.采用 MRI 和前列腺特异性抗原密度相结合的风险适应策略对 PI-RADS 3“灰色区域”病变患者进行个体化活检决策。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Jun;22(3):102071. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102071. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
7
Using decision curve analysis to benchmark performance of a magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model for prostate cancer risk assessment.使用决策曲线分析对基于磁共振成像的深度学习模型进行前列腺癌风险评估的性能进行基准测试。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6867-6876. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07030-1. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.“mpMRI 是否足够”或 IMRIE 研究:一项多中心研究,比较了活检前多参数磁共振成像与活检。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1027-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
9
Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.活检前MRI检查结果为阴性后临床显著前列腺癌的检测:双参数MRI与多参数MRI的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 May;218(5):859-866. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26569. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
10
Multivariable stratification of PI-RADS version 2.1 categories for the risk of false-positive target biopsy: Impact on prostate biopsy decisions.PI-RADS 版本 2.1 各分类的多变量分层对靶向活检假阳性风险的影响:对前列腺活检决策的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110897. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110897. Epub 2023 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-assisted enhancement of prostate volume metrics in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis.人工智能辅助增强前列腺体积指标在临床显著性前列腺癌诊断中的应用:一项回顾性分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Feb 1;15(2):1641-1652. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1015. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
MR Molecular Imaging of Extradomain-B Fibronectin for Assessing Progression and Therapy Resistance of Prostate Cancer.用于评估前列腺癌进展和治疗抗性的胞外区域B纤连蛋白的磁共振分子成像
Chem Biomed Imaging. 2024 Jun 11;2(8):560-568. doi: 10.1021/cbmi.4c00002. eCollection 2024 Aug 26.
3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
磁共振成像、临床和活检在疑似前列腺癌中的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4258.