• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用决策曲线分析对基于磁共振成像的深度学习模型进行前列腺癌风险评估的性能进行基准测试。

Using decision curve analysis to benchmark performance of a magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model for prostate cancer risk assessment.

机构信息

Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6867-6876. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07030-1. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-020-07030-1
PMID:32591889
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To benchmark the performance of a calibrated 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) applied to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for risk assessment of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using decision curve analysis (DCA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 499 patients who had positive mpMRI (PI-RADSv2 ≥ 3) and MRI-targeted biopsy. The training cohort comprised 449 men, including a calibration set of 50 men. Biopsy decision strategies included using risk estimates from the CNN (original and calibrated), to perform biopsy in men with PI-RADSv2 ≥ 4 only, or additionally in men with PI-RADSv2 3 and PSA density (PSAd) ≥ 0.15 ng/ml/ml. Discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness in the unseen test cohort (n = 50) were assessed using C-statistic, calibration plots and DCA, respectively.

RESULTS

The calibrated CNN achieved moderate calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration test, p = 0.41) and good discrimination (C = 0.85). DCA revealed consistently higher net benefit and net reduction in biopsies for the calibrated CNN compared with the original CNN, PI-RADSv2 ≥ 4 and the combined strategy of PI-RADSv2 and PSAd. Original CNN predictions were severely miscalibrated (p < 0.0001) resulting in net harm compared with a 'biopsy all' patients strategy. At-risk thresholds ≥ 10% using the calibrated CNN and the combined strategy reduced the number of biopsies by an estimated 201 and 55 men, respectively, per 1000 men at risk, without missing csPCa, while original CNN and PI-RADSv2 ≥ 4 could not achieve a net reduction in biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

DCA revealed that our calibrated 3D-CNN resulted in fewer unnecessary biopsies compared with using PI-RADSv2 alone or in combination with PSAd. CNN calibration is important in achieving clinical utility.

KEY POINTS

• A 3D deep learning model applied to multiparametric MRI may help to prevent unnecessary prostate biopsies in patients eligible for MRI-targeted biopsy. • Owing to miscalibration, original risk estimates by the deep learning model require prior calibration to enable clinical utility. • Decision curve analysis confirmed a net benefit of using our calibrated deep learning model for biopsy decisions compared with alternative strategies, including PI-RADSv2 alone and in combination with prostate-specific antigen density.

摘要

目的

使用决策曲线分析(DCA)对校准后的 3D 卷积神经网络(CNN)在多参数 MRI(mpMRI)用于临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)风险评估中的性能进行基准测试。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 499 例 mpMRI(PI-RADSv2≥3)阳性且行 MRI 靶向活检的患者。训练队列包括 449 例男性,其中 50 例为校准集。活检决策策略包括使用 CNN(原始和校准后的)的风险估计值,仅对 PI-RADSv2≥4 的男性进行活检,或者对 PI-RADSv2 为 3 且 PSA 密度(PSAd)≥0.15ng/ml/ml 的男性进行活检。使用 C 统计量、校准图和 DCA 分别评估未见过的测试队列(n=50)中的判别、校准和临床实用性。

结果

校准后的 CNN 具有中度校准(Hosmer-Lemeshow 校准检验,p=0.41)和良好的判别能力(C=0.85)。DCA 显示,与原始 CNN、PI-RADSv2≥4 和 PI-RADSv2 与 PSAd 联合策略相比,校准后的 CNN 始终具有更高的净收益和活检净减少。原始 CNN 预测严重校准不良(p<0.0001),与“活检所有”患者策略相比,导致净损害。使用校准后的 CNN 和联合策略,风险阈值≥10%可使每 1000 名高危患者的活检数量分别减少约 201 次和 55 次,同时不会错过 csPCa,而原始 CNN 和 PI-RADSv2≥4 则无法减少活检数量。

结论

DCA 表明,与单独使用 PI-RADSv2 或与 PSAd 联合使用相比,校准后的 3D-CNN 可减少不必要的活检。CNN 校准对于实现临床实用性非常重要。

关键点

  1. 应用于多参数 MRI 的深度学习模型可能有助于防止符合 MRI 靶向活检条件的患者进行不必要的前列腺活检。

  2. 由于校准不良,原始深度学习模型的风险估计需要进行校准,以实现临床实用性。

  3. DCA 证实,与替代策略(包括单独使用 PI-RADSv2 和与 PSA 密度联合使用)相比,使用我们校准后的深度学习模型进行活检决策具有净收益。

相似文献

1
Using decision curve analysis to benchmark performance of a magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model for prostate cancer risk assessment.使用决策曲线分析对基于磁共振成像的深度学习模型进行前列腺癌风险评估的性能进行基准测试。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6867-6876. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07030-1. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy: MRI-based Risk Models versus a PI-RADS and PSA Density Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.避免不必要的活检:基于 MRI 的风险模型与 PI-RADS 和 PSA 密度策略在临床显著前列腺癌中的应用。
Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):369-379. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204112. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.比较不同 PSA 密度阈值在前列腺 MRI PI-RADSv2.1 分类中的风险分层。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20210886. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210886. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.联合临床参数和多参数磁共振成像进行前列腺癌高危风险建模-个体化风险分层可减少不必要的活检。
Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):888-896. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.039. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
5
Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and PI-RADS version 2.0 for differentiating histologically benign prostate disease from prostate cancer in biopsies: A retrospective single-center comparison.术前多参数 MRI 和 PI-RADS 版本 2.0 鉴别前列腺穿刺活检中组织学良性前列腺疾病与前列腺癌:一项回顾性单中心比较研究。
Clin Imaging. 2021 Oct;78:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
6
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
7
Risk-Adapted Strategy Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density to Individualize Biopsy Decision in Patients With PI-RADS 3 ``Gray Zone'' Lesions.采用 MRI 和前列腺特异性抗原密度相结合的风险适应策略对 PI-RADS 3“灰色区域”病变患者进行个体化活检决策。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Jun;22(3):102071. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102071. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
8
Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).基于前列腺磁共振成像结局数据库(PROMOD)的多中心回顾性研究:应用前列腺特异性抗原密度和磁共振成像联合进行前列腺活检决策规划
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):971-979. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
9
The impact of prostate volume estimation on the risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate-specific antigen density and magnetic resonance imaging score.基于前列腺特异性抗原密度和磁共振成像评分的前列腺体积估计对风险适应活检决策的影响。
World J Urol. 2024 May 15;42(1):322. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04962-x.
10
Multivariable stratification of PI-RADS version 2.1 categories for the risk of false-positive target biopsy: Impact on prostate biopsy decisions.PI-RADS 版本 2.1 各分类的多变量分层对靶向活检假阳性风险的影响:对前列腺活检决策的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110897. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110897. Epub 2023 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating CT radiomics and clinical data with machine learning to predict fibrosis progression in coalworker pneumoconiosis.将CT影像组学和临床数据与机器学习相结合以预测煤工尘肺纤维化进展
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 22;12:1599739. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1599739. eCollection 2025.
2
AI-powered prostate cancer detection: a multi-centre, multi-scanner validation study.人工智能驱动的前列腺癌检测:一项多中心、多扫描仪验证研究。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb 28. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11323-0.
3
An explainable longitudinal multi-modal fusion model for predicting neoadjuvant therapy response in women with breast cancer.
用于预测乳腺癌女性新辅助治疗反应的可解释纵向多模态融合模型。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 7;15(1):9613. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53450-8.
4
Enhancing the diagnostic capacity of [F]PSMA-1007 PET/MRI in primary prostate cancer staging with artificial intelligence and semi-quantitative DCE: an exploratory study.利用人工智能和半定量动态对比增强磁共振成像提高[F]PSMA-1007正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像在原发性前列腺癌分期中的诊断能力:一项探索性研究。
EJNMMI Rep. 2024 Nov 8;8(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41824-024-00225-5.
5
Assessment of diagnostic value of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.单侧系统性活检联合靶向活检在检测临床显著性前列腺癌中的诊断价值评估
Open Med (Wars). 2024 Oct 4;19(1):20241048. doi: 10.1515/med-2024-1048. eCollection 2024.
6
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Reduce the Interference of Rectal Artifacts in MRI-based Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.深度学习模型的开发与验证:减少 MRI 前列腺癌诊断中直肠伪影的干扰。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230362. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230362.
7
A bibliometric analysis of worldwide cancer research using machine learning methods.使用机器学习方法对全球癌症研究进行的文献计量分析。
Cancer Innov. 2023 Apr 11;2(3):219-232. doi: 10.1002/cai2.68. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
A transfer learning nomogram for predicting prostate cancer and benign conditions on MRI.一种基于迁移学习的 MRI 前列腺癌与良性病变预测列线图。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Nov 30;23(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01163-7.
9
What benefit can be obtained from magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with artificial intelligence in prostate cancer compared with clinical assessments?与临床评估相比,人工智能在前列腺癌的磁共振成像诊断中能带来什么益处?
Mil Med Res. 2023 Jun 26;10(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00464-w.
10
Psychotic disorders as a framework for precision psychiatry.精神病障碍作为精准精神病学的框架。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2023 Apr;19(4):221-234. doi: 10.1038/s41582-023-00779-1. Epub 2023 Mar 6.