Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, UKE, Hamburg, Germany.
Rofo. 2021 Sep;193(9):1019-1033. doi: 10.1055/a-1348-2122. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
Throughout the literature, patellofemoral instability (PI) is defined as an increased risk of re-/luxation of the patella within the patellofemoral joint (PFJ). In most patients it is caused by traumatic patella luxation or the existence of a range of predisposing anatomic risk factors leading to an unphysiological movement sequence within the PFJ also known as patellofemoral maltracking. In order to provide an individualized therapy approach, clinical and radiological evaluation of those risk factors of variable magnitude becomes essential. Diagnostic imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plain radiography, and computed tomography (CT) are straightforward diagnostic tools in terms of evaluation and treatment of PI.
In this review we performed a precise analysis of today's literature concerning the radiological evaluation of anatomic risk factors leading to PI. The purpose of the review is to present a logical compilation of the different anatomical risk factors causing PI and provide a straight overview of valuable radiological imaging techniques.
PI is frequently based on a multifactorial disposition. The most relevant predisposing risk factors are trochlea dysplasia, rupture of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), patella alta, abnormal tibial tubercle to trochlea groove distance (TT-TG), femoral torsion deformities, and genu valgum. Although plain X-rays may provide basic diagnostic value, cross-sectional imaging (MRI, CT) is the standard radiological tool in terms of evaluation and detection of severity of predisposing anatomic variants leading to PI.
· Based on today's literature, PI is characterized as an increased risk of patella re-/luxation within the PFJ.. · Underlying anatomic risk factors of variable magnitude mark the pathological cause of PI.. · Modern diagnostic imaging (MRI and CT) permits straightforward diagnosis of the typical features in terms of PI.. · To provide an individualized therapy approach, precise radiological evaluation and determination of the severity of predisposing anatomic anomalies are essential..
· Maas KJ, Warncke ML, Leiderer M et al. Diagnostic Imaging of Patellofemoral Instability. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 1019 - 1033.
在文献中,髌股关节不稳(PI)被定义为髌骨在髌股关节(PFJ)内重新/脱位的风险增加。在大多数患者中,它是由创伤性髌骨脱位或一系列易患解剖风险因素引起的,这些因素导致 PFJ 内的非生理性运动序列,也称为髌股关节对线不良。为了提供个体化的治疗方法,对这些具有不同程度的风险因素进行临床和放射学评估变得至关重要。磁共振成像(MRI)、普通 X 线摄影和计算机断层扫描(CT)等诊断影像学是评估和治疗 PI 的直接诊断工具。
在本综述中,我们对有关导致 PI 的解剖风险因素的放射学评估的现有文献进行了精确分析。综述的目的是对导致 PI 的不同解剖风险因素进行逻辑综合,并提供有价值的放射影像学技术的直观概述。
PI 通常基于多因素倾向。最相关的易患风险因素包括滑车发育不良、内侧髌股韧带(MPFL)撕裂、髌骨高位、胫骨结节至滑车沟距离(TT-TG)异常、股骨扭转畸形和膝内翻。尽管普通 X 线摄影可能提供基本的诊断价值,但横断面成像(MRI、CT)是评估和检测导致 PI 的易患解剖变异严重程度的标准放射学工具。
· 根据现有文献,PI 的特征是 PFJ 内髌骨重新/脱位的风险增加。· 可变程度的潜在解剖风险因素标志着 PI 的病理原因。· 现代诊断影像学(MRI 和 CT)可直接诊断 PI 的典型特征。· 为了提供个体化的治疗方法,精确的放射学评估和确定易患解剖异常的严重程度至关重要。