• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电话辅助心肺复苏对公共场所旁观者心肺复苏提供中性别差异的影响。

Effects of telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the sex disparity in provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in public locations.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju-si, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, MyongjiHospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2021 Jul;164:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.03.014
PMID:33774152
Abstract

PURPOSE

Telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (TA-CPR) is an effective community intervention to increase bystander CPR rates. This study evaluated the effect of TA-CPR on the provision of bystander CPR as a function of the patient's sex.

METHODS

Adult (aged ≥ 18 years) patients who collapsed in a public location between January 2013 and December 2017 and received emergency medical service (EMS) treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of presumed cardiac aetiology were included in the study. The main exposures were TA-CPR and the patients' sex. The primary outcome was the implementation of bystander CPR by laypersons. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted, stratified based on the provision of TA-CPR, to examine the effect on bystander CPR according to patient sex.

RESULTS

In the final analysis, 15,840 patients with OHCAs were included. Patients who received TA-CPR accounted for 32.6% (5167/15,840) of the sample. Overall, 84.4% (814/964) of the women and 86.9% (3653/4203) of the men received bystander CPR in the TA-CPR group (P < 0.001). In the non-TA-CPR group, 40.5% (912/2252) of women and 47.3% (3653/8421) of men received bystander CPR (P < 0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, there was no significant difference in the odds ratio (OR) of bystander CPR according to patient sex in the TA-CPR group (adjusted OR [AOR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.01). Women were less likely to receive bystander CPR if the bystanders are not directed by TA-CPR (AOR: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

TA-CPR attenuated the sex disparity in bystander CPR provided in public places.

摘要

目的

电话辅助心肺复苏(TA-CPR)是提高旁观者 CPR 率的一种有效的社区干预措施。本研究评估了 TA-CPR 对旁观者 CPR 实施的影响,以及其与患者性别之间的关系。

方法

本研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间在公共场所发生心搏骤停(OHCA)的成年(年龄≥18 岁)患者,这些患者接受了紧急医疗服务(EMS)治疗,OHCA 的病因被认为是心脏性的。主要暴露因素为 TA-CPR 和患者的性别。主要结局为非专业人员实施旁观者 CPR。采用多变量逻辑回归分析,根据是否提供 TA-CPR 进行分层,以检查根据患者性别对旁观者 CPR 的影响。

结果

最终纳入 15840 例 OHCA 患者。接受 TA-CPR 的患者占样本的 32.6%(5167/15840)。总体而言,在 TA-CPR 组中,女性中有 84.4%(814/964),男性中有 86.9%(3653/4203)接受了旁观者 CPR(P<0.001)。在非 TA-CPR 组中,女性中有 40.5%(912/2252),男性中有 47.3%(3653/8421)接受了旁观者 CPR(P<0.001)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,在 TA-CPR 组中,根据患者性别,旁观者 CPR 的优势比(OR)没有显著差异(调整 OR [AOR],0.83;95%置信区间 [CI],0.68-1.01)。如果旁观者没有接受 TA-CPR 的指导,女性接受旁观者 CPR 的可能性较小(AOR:0.79;95% CI,0.70-0.87)。

结论

TA-CPR 减轻了公共场所旁观者 CPR 实施中的性别差异。

相似文献

1
Effects of telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the sex disparity in provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in public locations.电话辅助心肺复苏对公共场所旁观者心肺复苏提供中性别差异的影响。
Resuscitation. 2021 Jul;164:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Interaction between bystander sex and patient sex in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrests.旁观者性别与院外心搏骤停旁观者心肺复苏中患者性别的相互作用。
Resuscitation. 2023 Jun;187:109797. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109797. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
3
Recognising out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during emergency calls increases bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival.在紧急呼叫中识别院外心脏骤停可增加旁观者心肺复苏术和生存率。
Resuscitation. 2017 Jun;115:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
4
Recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during emergency calls and public awareness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in communities: A multilevel analysis.院外心脏骤停的识别和社区公众对心肺复苏的认知:一项多层次分析。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 8.
5
Comparison between dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR and self-led bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).院外心脏骤停(OHCA)中调度员协助的旁观者心肺复苏术与自主进行的旁观者心肺复苏术的比较。
Resuscitation. 2021 Jan;158:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
The impact of bystander relation and medical training on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes.旁观者关系和医学培训对院外心脏骤停结局的影响。
Resuscitation. 2020 May;150:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
Impact of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Dispatcher Assistance on Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Among Adult Patients by Location of Arrest.旁观者心肺复苏和调度员协助对成年院外心脏骤停患者按骤停地点划分的生存情况的影响
Int Heart J. 2020 Jan 31;61(1):46-53. doi: 10.1536/ihj.19-301. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
8
Conventional Versus Compression-Only Versus No-Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.常规心肺复苏与单纯按压心肺复苏与无旁观者心肺复苏用于儿科院外心脏骤停的比较。
Circulation. 2016 Dec 20;134(25):2060-2070. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023831. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
9
Do dispatcher instructions facilitate bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and improve outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A comparison of family and non-family bystanders.调度员的指导是否有助于旁观者启动心肺复苏并改善院外心脏骤停患者的预后?对家属和非家属旁观者的比较。
Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation differences by sex - The role of arrest recognition.旁观者心肺复苏术的性别差异 - 对骤停识别的作用。
Resuscitation. 2024 Jun;199:110224. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110224. Epub 2024 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation and patient's sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis.旁观者启动心肺复苏与患者性别之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Resusc Plus. 2025 Feb 28;22:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100916. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Global Sex Disparities in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review.全球院外心脏骤停后旁观者心肺复苏术的性别差异:范围综述。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e035794. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035794. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Barriers to successful dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Korea.
韩国院外心脏骤停时调度员辅助心肺复苏成功的障碍
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jul 19;19:100725. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100725. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Sex Differences in Receipt of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Considering Neighborhood Racial and Ethnic Composition.考虑邻里种族和民族构成的旁观者心肺复苏术获得情况的性别差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):e031113. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031113. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
5
Sex disparities in bystander defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停旁观者除颤中的性别差异。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Dec 19;17:100532. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100532. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Sex difference in the association between type of bystander CPR and clinical outcomes in patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停患者中旁观者心肺复苏类型与临床结局之间关联的性别差异。
Resusc Plus. 2022 Dec 23;13:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100342. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Gender disparities among adult recipients of layperson bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation by location of cardiac arrest in Pan-Asian communities: A registry-based study.泛亚社区心脏骤停地点对成年非专业旁观者心肺复苏术受助者的性别差异:一项基于登记处的研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Feb 12;44:101293. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101293. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Do Women Have a Higher Mortality Risk Than Men following ICU Admission after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.院外心脏骤停后入住重症监护病房的女性死亡率风险是否高于男性?一项回顾性队列分析。
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):4286. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184286.