Suppr超能文献

新冠肺炎危重症患者抗凝强度与出血风险:一项回顾性队列研究。

Bleeding risk by intensity of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2021 Jun;19(6):1533-1545. doi: 10.1111/jth.15310. Epub 2021 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies report hypercoagulability in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading many institutions to escalate anticoagulation intensity for thrombosis prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the bleeding risk with various intensities of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID-19 compared with other respiratory viral illnesses (ORVI).

PATIENTS/METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared the incidence of major bleeding in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) within a single health system with COVID-19 versus ORVI. In the COVID-19 cohort, we assessed the effect of anticoagulation intensity received on ICU admission on bleeding risk. We performed a secondary analysis with anticoagulation intensity as a time-varying covariate to reflect dose changes after ICU admission.

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-three and 387 patients were included in the COVID-19 and ORVI cohorts, respectively. The hazard ratio of major bleeding for the COVID-19 cohort relative to the ORVI cohort was 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-1.86). In COVID-19 patients, an inverse-probability treatment weighted model found therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation on ICU admission had an adjusted hazard ratio of bleeding of 1.55 (95% CI: 0.88-2.73) compared with standard prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation. However, when anticoagulation was assessed as a time-varying covariate and adjusted for other risk factors for bleeding, the adjusted hazard ratio for bleeding on therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation compared with standard thromboprophylaxis was 2.59 (95% CI: 1.20-5.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill patients with COVID-19 had a similar bleeding risk as ORVI patients. When accounting for changes in anticoagulation that occurred in COVID-19 patients, therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation was associated with a greater risk of major bleeding compared with standard thromboprophylaxis.

摘要

背景

研究报告称,2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)存在高凝状态,这导致许多机构提高了抗凝强度以预防血栓形成。

目的

与其他呼吸道病毒感染(ORVI)相比,确定 COVID-19 重症患者接受不同强度抗凝治疗的出血风险。

患者/方法:这项回顾性队列研究比较了单一医疗系统中入住重症监护病房(ICU)的 COVID-19 患者与 ORVI 患者的主要出血发生率。在 COVID-19 队列中,我们评估了 ICU 入院时接受的抗凝强度对出血风险的影响。我们使用抗凝强度作为时变协变量进行了二次分析,以反映 ICU 入院后剂量的变化。

结果

COVID-19 队列和 ORVI 队列分别纳入了 443 例和 387 例患者。COVID-19 队列的主要出血风险比 ORVI 队列高 1.26(95%置信区间[CI]:0.86-1.86)。在 COVID-19 患者中,逆概率治疗加权模型发现,与标准预防强度抗凝相比,ICU 入院时进行治疗强度抗凝的出血调整后危险比为 1.55(95%CI:0.88-2.73)。然而,当将抗凝作为时变协变量进行评估并调整出血的其他危险因素时,与标准抗血栓形成治疗相比,治疗强度抗凝的出血调整后危险比为 2.59(95%CI:1.20-5.57)。

结论

COVID-19 重症患者的出血风险与 ORVI 患者相似。当考虑 COVID-19 患者抗凝治疗的变化时,与标准抗血栓形成治疗相比,治疗强度抗凝与主要出血风险增加相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Anticoagulation practice patterns in COVID-19: A global survey.新型冠状病毒肺炎抗凝治疗实践模式:一项全球调查。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Aug 19;4(6):969-983. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12414. eCollection 2020 Aug.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验