Economic and Clinical Burden of Virus-Associated Hemorrhagic Cystitis in Patients Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the United States.

Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) caused by viral infections such as BK virus, cytomegalovirus, and/or adenovirus after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) causes morbidity and mortality, affects quality of life, and poses a substantial burden to the health care system. At present, HC management is purely supportive, as there are no approved or recommended antivirals for virus-associated HC. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to compare the economic burden, health resource utilization (HRU), and clinical outcomes among allo-HCT recipients with virus-associated HC to those without virus-associated HC using a large US claims database. Claims data obtained from the Decision Resources Group Real-World Evidence Data Repository were used to identify patients with first (index) allo-HCT procedure from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017. Outcomes were examined 1 year after allo-HCT and included total health care reimbursements, HRU, and clinical outcomes for allo-HCT patients with virus-associated HC versus those without. Further, a generalized linear model was used to determine adjusted reimbursements stratified by the presence or absence of any acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after adjusting for age, health plan, underlying disease, stem cell source, number of comorbidities, baseline reimbursements, and follow-up time. Of 13,363 allo-HCT recipients, 759 (5.7%) patients met the prespecified criteria for virus-associated HC. Total unadjusted mean reimbursement was $632,870 for patients with virus-associated HC and $340,469 for patients without virus-associated HC. In a multivariable model, after adjusting for confounders, the adjusted reimbursements were significantly higher for virus-associated HC patients with and without GVHD compared to patients without virus-associated HC (P < .0001). Patients with virus-associated HC stayed 7.9 additional days in the hospital (P < .0001) and 6.1 additional days (P = .0009) in the intensive care unit (ICU) for the index hospitalization, as compared to patients without virus-associated HC. The hospital readmission rate was higher for allo-HCT patients with versus without virus-associated HC (P < .0001), resulting in 12.9 more days in the hospital (P < .0001) and 7.3 more days in the ICU (P < .0001) after the index hospitalization. Among patients with GVHD, those with virus-associated HC had significantly higher all-cause mortality as compared to those without virus-associated HC (23.2% versus 18.4%; P = .0035). In an adjusted analysis, patients with virus-associated HC had a significantly higher risk of mortality, regardless of the presence of GVHD. When stratified by GVHD, there were no significant differences in the baseline risk for renal impairment; virus-associated HC was associated with increased risk for renal impairment in the follow-up period in patients with or without GVHD (P < .0001 for both). After allo-HCT, patients with virus-associated HC have significantly higher health care reimbursements and HRU, with worse clinical outcomes, including renal impairment, irrespective of the presence of GVHD and significantly higher all-cause mortality in the presence of GVHD. Our results highlight the unmet clinical need for effective strategies to prevent and treat virus-associated HC in HCT recipients that may also reduce costs among these patients.