Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Malta.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Malta.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 May;175:108783. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108783. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
In diabetic foot ulceration, a correlation between pressure and skin temperature is suspected. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a more rigorous analysis of existing literature related to the various technologies used to read and measure both in-shoe plantar pressures, and in-shoe skin temperatures simultaneously.
A systematic review of the literature related to the topic was searched in database sources such as Medline OVID, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CONAHL, PROSPERO, and Elsevier. Outcome measures of interest included validity, reliability and responsiveness of in-shoe temperature and/or pressure mapping device used, and characteristics and quantity of sensors used, anatomical landmarks and statistical analysis used to interpret the data. Quality of evidence and risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2.
Nineteen studies were identified and included in this review. The majority of studies used a small sample size (mean n = 17) and recruited healthy participants. All studies have shown excellent validity but only a few tested for the reliability of the device. None of the studies tested for responsiveness of the device. Quality assessment results scored high risk in view of 'patient selection', 'use of reference standard' and 'applicability', and low risk in view of 'use if index test' and 'flow and timing'.
The data outlined in this review confirms that further improvement, reliability testing and clinical validation of the developed systems is required despite the results of excellent performance in detecting changes of in-shoe skin temperature and pressure.
在糖尿病足溃疡中,怀疑存在压力与皮肤温度之间的相关性。本系统评价的目的是对与各种同时读取和测量鞋内足底压力和鞋内皮肤温度的技术相关的现有文献进行更严格的分析。
在 Medline OVID、Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、CONAHL、PROSPERO 和 Elsevier 等数据库中搜索与该主题相关的文献进行系统评价。感兴趣的结局指标包括所使用的鞋内温度和/或压力映射设备的有效性、可靠性和反应性,以及所使用的传感器的特征和数量、解释数据所使用的解剖学标志和统计分析。使用 QUADAS-2 评估证据质量和偏倚风险。
确定了 19 项研究并纳入本综述。大多数研究使用了小样本量(平均 n=17),并招募了健康参与者。所有研究均显示出极好的有效性,但只有少数研究测试了设备的可靠性。没有研究测试设备的反应性。质量评估结果在“患者选择”、“参考标准的使用”和“适用性”方面存在高风险,在“索引测试的使用”和“流程和时间”方面存在低风险。
尽管在检测鞋内皮肤温度和压力变化方面表现出出色的性能,但本综述中概述的数据证实,需要进一步改进、可靠性测试和对开发系统进行临床验证。