Suppr超能文献

经皮内镜下胃造口术与 Stamm 胃造口术的比较。

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with Stamm gastrostomy.

作者信息

Grant J P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1988 May;207(5):598-603. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198805000-00014.

Abstract

In a review of 125 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEG) and 88 Stamm gastrostomies performed at Duke University Medical Center since 1978, the average operating room time for PEG (50 +/- 20 min) was shorter than for Stamm (96 +/- 26 min) (p less than 0.0001). General anesthesia was administered in only 13% of PEG placements compared with 64% of Stamm gastrostomies. The cost of PEG was about $1000 less than for Stamm gastrostomies. The average time after surgery until use of the feeding tube was 1.8 days for PEG compared with 3.4 days for Stamm (p less than 0.0001). The overall complication rate after PEG was 8.8% (4.0% major) compared with 23.9% for Stamm gastrostomies (10.2% major) (p less than 0.005). PEG reduces operative time, necessity for general anesthesia, expense of insertion, incidence of complications, and requires less recovery time before use. PEG is the procedure of choice for gastric feeding access.

摘要

自1978年以来,对杜克大学医学中心进行的125例经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)和88例 Stamm 胃造口术进行回顾发现,PEG 的平均手术时间(50±20分钟)比 Stamm 胃造口术(96±26分钟)短(p<0.0001)。PEG 置管仅13%使用全身麻醉,而 Stamm 胃造口术为64%。PEG 的费用比 Stamm 胃造口术约少1000美元。PEG 术后至开始使用饲管的平均时间为1.8天,而 Stamm 胃造口术为3.4天(p<0.0001)。PEG 术后总体并发症发生率为8.8%(严重并发症为4.0%),而 Stamm 胃造口术为23.9%(严重并发症为10.2%)(p<0.005)。PEG 可缩短手术时间、减少全身麻醉的必要性、降低置管费用、减少并发症发生率,并且使用前所需的恢复时间更短。PEG 是胃饲管置入的首选方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a3/1493508/081bde1b74bc/annsurg00195-0122-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验