[A comparative study of 2 technics of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy].

OBJECTIVE

To compare the two most frequently used methods of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Pull-string Ponsky-Gauderer type and Push-over-wire Sachs-Vine gastrostomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with oral feeding incapacity were prospectively randomized to one of the two methods of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. In 22 patients the Ponsky-Gauderer type were used and in the other 22 the Sachs-Vine gastrostomy were employed. In every case the gastrostomy tube was replaced 4-5 months after its placement by a Flexiflo tube. The mean follow-up of the patients was 7.3 months (range: 4-18).

RESULTS

Gastrostomy was successful in every case. No differences were found between the two procedures in technical difficulties or complications during gastrostomy placement. Wound infection occurred in 6 patients (13%), 3 in each group, and in all cases it was cured with topic antibiotic treatment administered through the gastrostomy. Tube dislodgement was observed in 3 patients in the Ponsky-Gauderer group (soft internal with-holder). The only significant difference between the two procedures was found at the removal of the gastrostomy tube. In the Sachs-Vine type the removal of the tube was always endoscopically performed (due to the presence of a rigid internal with-holder), while the Ponsky-Gauderer type was always done by traction (soft internal with-holder). No related procedure mortality was found with any of the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

Both percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy techniques are similar in efficacy, safety and morbidity and they prove to be a valid alternative to surgical gastrostomy in patients with oral feeding incapacity.