Suppr超能文献

报告的体征和症状与英国关键工作人员中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测之间的关联。

Association between self-reported signs and symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in UK key workers.

机构信息

UK Field Epidemiology Training Programme (FETP), Public Health England, London, United Kingdom; Field Service, Midlands, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Infect. 2021 May;82(5):151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.03.019. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is under way in some key worker groups; how this adds to self-reported COVID-19 illness is unclear. In this study, we investigate the association between self-reported belief of COVID-19 illness and seropositivity.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of three key worker streams comprising (A) Police and Fire & Rescue (2 sites) (B) healthcare workers (1 site) and (C) healthcare workers with previously positive PCR result (5 sites). We collected self-reported signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and compared this with serology results from two SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays (Roche Elecsys® and EUROIMMUN).

RESULTS

Between 01 and 26 June, we recruited 2847 individuals (Stream A: 1,247, Stream B: 1,546 and Stream C: 154). Amongst those without previous positive PCR tests, 687/2,579 (26%) reported belief they had COVID-19, having experienced compatible symptoms; however, only 208 (30.3%) of these were seropositive on both immunoassays. Both immunoassays had high sensitivities relative to previous PCR positivity (>93%); there was also limited decline in antibody titres up to 110 days post symptom onset. Symptomatic but seronegative individuals had differing symptom profiles and shorter illnesses than seropositive individuals.

CONCLUSION

Non-COVID-19 respiratory illness may have been mistaken for COVID-19 during the outbreak; laboratory testing is more specific than self-reported key worker beliefs in ascertaining past COVID-19 disease.

摘要

背景

目前正在一些关键工作人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 抗体筛查;但尚不清楚这对自我报告的 COVID-19 疾病有何影响。在这项研究中,我们调查了自我报告的 COVID-19 疾病信念与血清阳性之间的关联。

方法

横断面研究了三个关键工作人群,包括(A)警察和消防与救援(2 个地点)(B)医护人员(1 个地点)和(C)有先前 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阳性结果的医护人员(5 个地点)。我们收集了自我报告的 COVID-19 症状和体征,并将其与来自两种 SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析(罗氏 Elecsys®和 EUROIMMUN)的血清学结果进行了比较。

结果

在 6 月 1 日至 26 日期间,我们招募了 2847 名个体(A 组:1247 名,B 组:1546 名,C 组:154 名)。在没有先前阳性 PCR 检测结果的人群中,有 687/2579(26%)报告称他们有 COVID-19 疾病信念,经历过符合的症状;但只有 208(30.3%)人在两种免疫分析中均呈血清阳性。两种免疫分析的相对先前 PCR 阳性的敏感性均较高(>93%);在症状出现后 110 天内,抗体滴度也有有限下降。有症状但血清阴性的个体与血清阳性的个体相比,有不同的症状谱和较短的疾病持续时间。

结论

在疫情期间,非 COVID-19 呼吸道疾病可能被误认为是 COVID-19;与自我报告的关键工作者信念相比,实验室检测在确定过去的 COVID-19 疾病方面更具特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5a3/7997203/6fad2acf1dde/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验