• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包皮环套环切术:新生儿与婴儿的比较

Plastibell circumcision: Comparison between neonates and infants.

作者信息

Bawazir Osama A, Alsaiari Wejdan Rubayyi S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2020 Oct-Dec;12(4):347-351. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_146_19. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

DOI:10.4103/UA.UA_146_19
PMID:33776331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7992528/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Plastibell circumcision technique has gained popularity worldwide. It has a low bleeding risk which makes it suitable for a vulnerable population and in late circumcision. However, several problems resulting from prolonged retention of the Plastibell ring were reported.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to assess the outcomes of circumcision performed using Plastibell devices, report ring-related complications, and compare the complications of the technique between neonates and infants.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that was conducted in a total of 989 male neonates and infants who had Plastibell circumcision performed by a single surgeon between June 2006 and February 2018. Postoperative complications were reported and compared between the two age groups. The indications of the Plastibell technique were religious in 988 patients and urinary tract infection in 1 patient.

RESULTS

During the study period, Plastibell circumcision was performed in 633 neonates and 356 infants. The average ages of neonates and infants were 14 ± 2 days and 3 ± 0.5 months, respectively. Complications developed in 89 cases, 4.4% in neonates and 17% in infants ( < 0.001). The retained ring was the most common complication in 46 cases (4.6%), followed by excess skin in 21 cases (2%). Bleeding occurred in 10 cases (1%), infection in 7 cases (0.7%), and hematoma in 2 cases (0.2%).

CONCLUSION

Complications of Plastibell circumcision are significantly higher in infants than in neonates, and ring retention is the most common complication in both the groups. However, the risk of severe hemorrhage is low making it a good option for infants in the outpatient setting.

摘要

背景

Plastibell包皮环切术在全球范围内广受欢迎。其出血风险低,适用于弱势群体及大龄儿童包皮环切术。然而,有报道称Plastibell环长时间留存会引发一些问题。

目的

本研究旨在评估使用Plastibell器械进行包皮环切术的效果,报告与环相关的并发症,并比较新生儿和婴儿该技术的并发症情况。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,共纳入989例男性新生儿和婴儿,于2006年6月至2018年2月由同一位外科医生进行Plastibell包皮环切术。报告并比较两个年龄组的术后并发症。Plastibell技术的适应证中,988例为宗教原因,1例为尿路感染。

结果

研究期间,633例新生儿和356例婴儿接受了Plastibell包皮环切术。新生儿和婴儿的平均年龄分别为14±2天和3±0.5个月。89例出现并发症,新生儿为4.4%,婴儿为17%(P<0.001)。环留存是最常见的并发症,共46例(4.6%),其次是多余皮肤21例(2%)。出血10例(1%),感染7例(0.7%),血肿2例(0.2%)。

结论

Plastibell包皮环切术的并发症在婴儿中显著高于新生儿,环留存是两组中最常见的并发症。然而,严重出血风险低,使其成为门诊婴儿的一个不错选择。

相似文献

1
Plastibell circumcision: Comparison between neonates and infants.包皮环套环切术:新生儿与婴儿的比较
Urol Ann. 2020 Oct-Dec;12(4):347-351. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_146_19. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
2
Comparison of complications of circumcision by 'Plastibell device technique' in male neonates and infants.男性新生儿和婴儿采用“普拉斯蒂贝尔装置技术”进行包皮环切术的并发症比较。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2010 Aug;60(8):664-7.
3
Plastibell circumcision of 2,276 male infants: a multi-centre study.2276例男婴的包皮环切术:一项多中心研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Feb 9;23:35. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.23.35.7841. eCollection 2016.
4
Safety of the plastibell circumcision in neonates, infants, and older children.新生儿、婴儿及大龄儿童使用包皮环环切术的安全性。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2018 Sep-Oct;12(5):10-13.
5
Circumcision With the Plastibell Technique: A Descriptive Case Series.采用普拉斯蒂贝尔技术进行包皮环切术:描述性病例系列
Cureus. 2022 Oct 23;14(10):e30601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30601. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Ten years experience with a novel modification of plastibell circumcision.新型袖套式包皮环切术的十年经验
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2014 Apr-Jun;11(2):179-83. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.132832.
7
Plastibell circumcision supported by a calcium-alginate fibre dressing to reduce bleeding.采用藻酸钙纤维敷料辅助的包皮环切夹环切术以减少出血。
Arab J Urol. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
Is the plastibell of any haemostatic value after 24 h?24小时后,包皮环钳有任何止血价值吗?
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2017 Jan-Mar;14(1):5-7. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_19_16.
9
Plastibell Device Circumcision versus Bone Cutter Technique in terms of Operative Outcomes and Parent's Satisfaction.包皮环扎术与包皮环切器环切术在手术效果及家长满意度方面的比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):347-50. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9510.
10
A randomized trial of Mogen clamp versus Plastibell for neonatal male circumcision in Botswana.莫根钳与塑胶环法用于博茨瓦纳新生儿男性包皮环切术的随机试验。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Apr 15;62(5):e131-7. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318285d449.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13-17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe.PrePex 装置是否可作为 13-17 岁青少年男性行包皮环切术的替代方法?津巴布韦常规服务提供期间主动监测的结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213399. eCollection 2019.
2
Avoidance of general anesthesia for circumcision in infants under 6 months of age using a modified Plastibell technique.采用改良的普拉斯蒂贝尔技术避免对6个月以下婴儿进行包皮环切术时使用全身麻醉。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 May;35(5):619-623. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04452-x. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
3
Safety of the plastibell circumcision in neonates, infants, and older children.
新生儿、婴儿及大龄儿童使用包皮环环切术的安全性。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2018 Sep-Oct;12(5):10-13.
4
Early infant male circumcision: Systematic review, risk-benefit analysis, and progress in policy.早期男婴包皮环切术:系统评价、风险效益分析及政策进展
World J Clin Pediatr. 2017 Feb 8;6(1):89-102. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v6.i1.89.
5
Reported Male Circumcision Practices in a Muslim-Majority Setting.在穆斯林占多数地区报告的男性包皮环切术做法。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4957348. doi: 10.1155/2017/4957348. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
6
Plastibell circumcision of 2,276 male infants: a multi-centre study.2276例男婴的包皮环切术:一项多中心研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Feb 9;23:35. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.23.35.7841. eCollection 2016.
7
Circumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: A critical assessment of recent evidence.发达国家男性婴儿和儿童割礼作为公共卫生措施:对最新证据的批判性评估。
Glob Public Health. 2018 May;13(5):626-641. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1184292. Epub 2016 May 19.
8
Plastibell Device Circumcision versus Bone Cutter Technique in terms of Operative Outcomes and Parent's Satisfaction.包皮环扎术与包皮环切器环切术在手术效果及家长满意度方面的比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):347-50. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9510.
9
Newborn male circumcision.新生儿男性包皮环切术。
Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Aug-Sep;20(6):311-20. doi: 10.1093/pch/20.6.311.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang Ring vs conventional circumcision.使用商环包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urology. 2015 Apr;85(4):799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Feb 21.