Pepin Joanna R, Cohen Philip N
Department of Sociology, University at Buffalo.
Department of Sociology, University of Maryland.
J Fam Econ Issues. 2021 Mar;42(1):13-28. doi: 10.1007/s10834-020-09717-5. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
Using data from the 2012 International Social Survey Program (n = 8,269), this study investigated how couples integrate and manage their income across 20 countries with varying degrees of gender inequality. Couples were more likely to report that one person managed the shared pot of money in countries with high gender inequality compared with couples in more gender equal countries. This pattern was not moderated by within-couple earnings equality. We found a cohabitation-marriage gap in income arrangements that is largest where national-level gender equality is high. In more gender equal contexts, married couples were more likely to pool and manage their money together, whereas a larger proportion of married couples assigned one money manager in countries with less gender equality. Cohabiting couples were more likely to keep some money separate than to take-up a pooled, jointly managed approach in more gender equal countries. Findings demonstrate the need to consider both management and pooling dimensions of couples' treatment of money to understand the influence of contextual factors on couples' income arrangements.
本研究利用2012年国际社会调查项目的数据(n = 8269),调查了20个性别不平等程度各异的国家中夫妻如何整合与管理他们的收入。与性别平等程度较高国家的夫妻相比,性别不平等程度高的国家中,夫妻更倾向于报告由一人管理共同资金。这种模式并未因夫妻内部收入平等而有所缓和。我们发现,在国家层面性别平等程度高的地方,收入安排上的同居-婚姻差距最大。在性别平等程度更高的环境中,已婚夫妻更有可能共同汇集和管理他们的资金,而在性别平等程度较低的国家,更大比例的已婚夫妻指定一人管理资金。在性别平等程度更高的国家,同居伴侣比采用共同汇集、共同管理方式更倾向于各自保留一些资金。研究结果表明,需要同时考虑夫妻理财的管理和汇集层面,以理解背景因素对夫妻收入安排的影响。