• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在压缩储能系统中使用一氧化碳作为缓冲气体的地球化学限制。

Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems.

作者信息

Iloejesi Chidera O, Beckingham Lauren E

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Environ Eng Sci. 2021 Mar 1;38(3):115-126. doi: 10.1089/ees.2020.0345. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1089/ees.2020.0345
PMID:33776404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7994420/
Abstract

Compressed energy storage (CES) of air, CO, or H in porous formations is a promising means of energy storage to abate the intermittency of renewable energy production. During operation, gas is injected during times of excess energy production and extracted during excess demands to drive turbines. Storage in saline aquifers using CO as a cushion or working gas has numerous advantages over typical air storage in caverns. However, interactions between CO and saline aquifers may result in potential operational limitations and have not been considered. This work utilizes reactive transport simulations to evaluate the geochemical reactions that occur during injection and extraction operational cycles for CES in a porous formation using CO as a cushion gas. Simulation results are compared with similar simulations considering an injection-only flow regime of geologic CO storage. Once injected, CO creates conditions favorable for dissolution of carbonate and aluminosilicate minerals. However, the dissolution extent is limited in the cyclic flow regime where significantly smaller dissolution occurs after the first cycle such that CO is a viable choice of cushion gas. In the injection-only flow regime, larger extents of dissolution occur as the fluid continues to be undersaturated with respect to formation minerals throughout the study period and porosity increased uniformly from 24.84% to 33.6% throughout the simulation domain. For the cyclic flow conditions, porosity increases nonuniformly to 31.1% and 25.8% closest and furthest from the injection well, respectively.

摘要

在多孔地层中对空气、一氧化碳或氢气进行压缩能量存储(CES)是一种很有前景的能量存储方式,可缓解可再生能源生产的间歇性问题。在运行过程中,在能源生产过剩时注入气体,在需求过剩时提取气体以驱动涡轮机。使用一氧化碳作为缓冲或工作气体存储在盐水层中比在洞穴中进行典型的空气存储具有许多优势。然而,一氧化碳与盐水层之间的相互作用可能会导致潜在的运行限制,目前尚未得到考虑。这项工作利用反应输运模拟来评估在多孔地层中以一氧化碳作为缓冲气体进行压缩能量存储的注入和提取操作循环期间发生的地球化学反应。将模拟结果与考虑地质一氧化碳存储仅注入流态的类似模拟进行比较。一旦注入,一氧化碳会创造有利于碳酸盐和铝硅酸盐矿物溶解的条件。然而,在循环流态中溶解程度是有限的,在第一个循环之后溶解量显著减小,因此一氧化碳是一种可行的缓冲气体选择。在仅注入流态中,随着流体在整个研究期间相对于地层矿物持续不饱和,溶解程度更大,并且在整个模拟区域内孔隙度从24.84%均匀增加到33.6%。对于循环流条件,孔隙度在距离注入井最近和最远的地方分别不均匀地增加到31.1%和25.8%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/56572ede415e/ees.2020.0345_figure6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/1c75e1c30a6b/ees.2020.0345_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/fa2d8cbc0a7d/ees.2020.0345_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/2950bf65608f/ees.2020.0345_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/6c1374b2f276/ees.2020.0345_figure4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/28219706ffb0/ees.2020.0345_figure5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/56572ede415e/ees.2020.0345_figure6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/1c75e1c30a6b/ees.2020.0345_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/fa2d8cbc0a7d/ees.2020.0345_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/2950bf65608f/ees.2020.0345_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/6c1374b2f276/ees.2020.0345_figure4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/28219706ffb0/ees.2020.0345_figure5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e92e/7994420/56572ede415e/ees.2020.0345_figure6.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Geochemical Limitations to Utilizing CO as a Cushion Gas in Compressed Energy Storage Systems.评估在压缩储能系统中使用一氧化碳作为缓冲气体的地球化学限制。
Environ Eng Sci. 2021 Mar 1;38(3):115-126. doi: 10.1089/ees.2020.0345. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Effects of Aqueous Solubility and Geochemistry on CO Injection for Shale Gas Reservoirs.水溶性和地球化学对页岩气藏注CO₂的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 7;10(1):2071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59131-y.
3
Effect of Mineral Dissolution/Precipitation and CO Exsolution on CO transport in Geological Carbon Storage.矿物溶解/沉淀和 CO 脱溶对地质碳储存中 CO 传输的影响。
Acc Chem Res. 2017 Sep 19;50(9):2056-2066. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00651. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
4
Modeling Self-Sealing Mechanisms in Fractured Carbonates Induced by CO Injection in Saline Aquifers.模拟盐水层中注入CO₂引起的裂缝性碳酸盐岩自封闭机制
ACS Omega. 2023 Dec 13;8(51):48925-48937. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c06456. eCollection 2023 Dec 26.
5
Pore-Scale Geochemical Reactivity Associated with CO Storage: New Frontiers at the Fluid-Solid Interface.CO2 存储的孔隙尺度地球化学反应性:流固界面的新前沿。
Acc Chem Res. 2017 Apr 18;50(4):759-768. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00019. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
6
Rates of CO Mineralization in Geological Carbon Storage.地质碳储存中的 CO2 矿化速率。
Acc Chem Res. 2017 Sep 19;50(9):2075-2084. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00334. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
Influence of Chemical, Mechanical, and Transport Processes on Wellbore Leakage from Geologic CO Storage Reservoirs.化学、机械和传输过程对地质 CO2 储存库井筒泄漏的影响。
Acc Chem Res. 2017 Aug 15;50(8):1829-1837. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00094. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
Assessment of the oxygen reactivity in a gas storage facility by multiphase reactive transport modeling of field data for air injection into a sandstone reservoir in the Paris Basin, France.通过对法国巴黎盆地砂岩储层注空气现场数据的多相反应传输模拟评估气体储存设施中的氧气反应性。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 15;869:161657. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161657. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
Geochemical evaluation of Washita-Fredericksburg formation as a carbon storage reservoir.作为碳储存库的瓦希塔-弗雷德里克斯堡组的地球化学评估。
J Contam Hydrol. 2024 Jul;265:104393. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104393. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
10
Reactive Transport Modeling of the Enhancement of Density-Driven CO2 Convective Mixing in Carbonate Aquifers and its Potential Implication on Geological Carbon Sequestration.碳酸盐含水层中密度驱动的二氧化碳对流混合增强的反应输运模型及其对地质碳封存的潜在影响
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 20;6:24768. doi: 10.1038/srep24768.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-Dimensional Pore-Scale Modeling of Fracture Evolution in Heterogeneous Carbonate Caprock Subjected to CO-Enriched Brine.受富 CO2 盐水影响的非均质碳酸盐盖层中裂缝演化的三维孔隙尺度建模。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Apr 16;53(8):4630-4639. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05653. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
2
Rates of CO Mineralization in Geological Carbon Storage.地质碳储存中的 CO2 矿化速率。
Acc Chem Res. 2017 Sep 19;50(9):2075-2084. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00334. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
3
The Nanoscale Basis of CO2 Trapping for Geologic Storage.
二氧化碳地质封存的纳米基础。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Sep 1;49(17):10265-84. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03003. Epub 2015 Aug 20.