Suppr超能文献

肌筋膜松解术与穆利根持续自然骨骺滑动对非特异性下腰痛的疼痛、功能和活动度的即时及短期影响

Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides' immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain.

作者信息

Bhat P Vignesh, Patel Vivek Dineshbhai, Eapen Charu, Shenoy Manisha, Milanese Steve

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India.

Department of Physical Therapy, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2021 Mar 15;9:e10706. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10706. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myofascial release (MFR) and Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) are manual therapy techniques routinely practiced in the management of non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). As a solo intervention or along with other therapies, both methods have reported positive results for individuals with NSLBP. However, which technique improves NSLBP-related pain, restricted range of motion (ROM) and disability, warrants further research.

OBJECTIVE

To study the comparative effects of MFR and SNAGs on pain, disability, functional ability, and lumbar ROM in NSLBP.

METHOD

A parallel-group study was conducted at tertiary care hospitals. Sixty-five Sub-acute or chronic NSLBP patients were allocated to receive strengthening exercises along with either MFR ( = 33) or SNAGs ( = 32) for six treatment sessions over one week. An independent assessor evaluated outcome measures such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient-Specific Function Scale (PSFS), and ROM at baseline, immediate (after 1st treatment), and short-term (post-sixth day of the intervention). The Modified Oswestry disability index (MODI) was assessed at baseline and short-term.

RESULTS

Within-group analysis found clinically and statistically significant ( < 0.05) changes for VAS and PSFS at immediate and short-term for both the groups. The lumbar extension also showed improvement immediately and in the short-term. Improvement in Lumbar flexion was seen only in the SNAGs group over the short-term. A statistically significant improvement was seen for MODI in both the groups but was not clinically significant in the MFR group. The analysis observed no statistically significant difference ( < 0.05) between the groups at both the immediate and short-term.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain and restricted function associated with NSLBP can be improved using SNAGs or MFR, along with strengthening exercises. For limited lumbar flexion ROM, Mulligan SNAGs have a better outcome than MFR over the short-term. Hence, both manual therapy techniques can be incorporated along with exercises for immediate and short-term management of sub-acute to chronic NSLBP.. CTRI/2018/12/016787 (http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/).

摘要

背景

肌筋膜放松术(MFR)和穆利根持续性自然骨突滑动术(SNAGs)是常用于非特异性下腰痛(NSLBP)治疗的手动治疗技术。作为单一干预措施或与其他疗法联合使用,这两种方法对NSLBP患者均报告了积极效果。然而,哪种技术能改善与NSLBP相关的疼痛、活动范围受限(ROM)和功能障碍,仍需进一步研究。

目的

研究MFR和SNAGs对NSLBP患者疼痛、功能障碍、功能能力和腰椎ROM的比较效果。

方法

在三级医疗机构进行了一项平行组研究。65例亚急性或慢性NSLBP患者被分配接受强化锻炼,同时接受MFR(n = 33)或SNAGs(n = 32)治疗,为期一周,共六个治疗疗程。一名独立评估者在基线、即刻(第一次治疗后)和短期(干预第六天后)评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)、患者特定功能量表(PSFS)和ROM等结局指标。在基线和短期评估改良Oswestry功能障碍指数(MODI)。

结果

组内分析发现,两组在即刻和短期时VAS和PSFS均有临床和统计学意义的变化(P < 0.05)。腰椎后伸在即刻和短期也有改善。仅SNAGs组在短期内腰椎前屈有改善。两组MODI均有统计学意义的改善,但MFR组无临床意义。分析观察到两组在即刻和短期时均无统计学意义的差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

使用SNAGs或MFR联合强化锻炼可改善与NSLBP相关的疼痛和功能受限。对于有限的腰椎前屈ROM,短期内穆利根SNAGs比MFR效果更好。因此,这两种手动治疗技术均可与锻炼相结合,用于亚急性至慢性NSLBP的即刻和短期管理。CTRI/2018/12/016787(http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ee2/7971081/b3596f0f013f/peerj-09-10706-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验