Slabbert Ashley, Hasking Penelope, Greene Danyelle, Boyes Mark
School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
PeerJ. 2021 Mar 15;9:e10915. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10915. eCollection 2021.
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is the intentional damage to one's body tissue in the absence of suicidal intent. NSSI primarily serves an emotion regulation function, with individuals engaging in self-injury to escape intense or unwanted emotion. Low distress tolerance has been identified as a mechanism that underlies self-injury, and is commonly assessed using the self-report Distress Tolerance Scale. There are mixed findings regarding the factor structure of the Distress Tolerance Scale, with some researchers utilising a higher-order distress tolerance score (derived from the scores on the four lower-order subscales) and other researchers using the four subscales as unique predictors of psychological outcomes. Neither of these factor structures have been assessed among individuals with a history of self-injury. Of note, an inability to tolerate distress (thought to underlie NSSI) may limit an individual's capacity to accurately observe and report specific thoughts and emotions experienced in a state of heightened distress, which may impact the validity of scores on the Distress Tolerance Scale. Therefore, measurement invariance should be established before attributing NSSI-related differences on the scale to true differences in distress tolerance. We compared the Distress Tolerance Scale higher-order model with the lower-order four factor model among university students with and without a history of NSSI. Our results indicated that the lower-order four factor model was a significantly better fit to the data than the higher-order model. We then tested the measurement invariance of this lower-order factor model among individuals with and without a history of NSSI, and established configural and full metric invariance, followed by partial scalar and full residual error invariance. These results suggest the four subscales of the Distress Tolerance Scale can be used to confidently discern NSSI-related differences in distress tolerance.
非自杀性自伤(NSSI)是指在没有自杀意图的情况下故意对自己的身体组织造成伤害。NSSI主要起到情绪调节功能,个体通过自我伤害来逃避强烈或 unwanted 情绪。低痛苦耐受性已被确定为自我伤害背后的一种机制,通常使用自我报告的痛苦耐受量表进行评估。关于痛苦耐受量表的因子结构存在不同的研究结果,一些研究人员使用高阶痛苦耐受分数(由四个低阶子量表的分数得出),而其他研究人员则将四个子量表作为心理结果的独特预测指标。在有自伤史的个体中,尚未对这两种因子结构进行评估。值得注意的是,无法耐受痛苦(被认为是NSSI的基础)可能会限制个体准确观察和报告在高度痛苦状态下所经历的特定思想和情绪的能力,这可能会影响痛苦耐受量表分数的有效性。因此,在将量表上与NSSI相关的差异归因于痛苦耐受性的真正差异之前,应建立测量不变性。我们比较了有和没有NSSI病史的大学生中痛苦耐受量表的高阶模型和低阶四因子模型。我们的结果表明,低阶四因子模型对数据的拟合度明显优于高阶模型。然后,我们测试了这个低阶因子模型在有和没有NSSI病史的个体中的测量不变性,并建立了构型和完全度量不变性,随后是部分标量和完全残差误差不变性。这些结果表明,痛苦耐受量表的四个子量表可用于可靠地辨别与NSSI相关的痛苦耐受性差异。