Saini Suman, Gupta Anju, Rao Shruti Mahesh, Krishna Bhavya, Raheja Saveena, Malhotra Rajeev Kumar, Gupta Dr Nishkarsh
Anesthesiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, IND.
Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, IND.
Cureus. 2021 Feb 22;13(2):e13500. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13500.
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery may lead to significant postoperative pain. Interscalene block (ISB) is an effective analgesic technique in these surgeries but there is a risk of the phrenic blockade. Subacromial local anesthetic infiltration is a phrenic sparing alternative technique for postoperative analgesia. The primary aim of our study was to compare the ISB with a continuous subacromial infusion (SAC) with regard to postoperative analgesia.
This prospective randomized, interventional parallel arm trial was conducted in 60 ASA grade I and II, adult patients (30 patients in each group) posted for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided ISB (Group ISB: 15 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine) or continuous SAC (Group SAC: 15 ml 0.75% ropivacaine as a subacromial injection by ultrasound guidance and infusion of 3 ml/hour of 0.5% ropivacaine through the catheter placed subacromial by the surgeon). Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, visual analog scores (VAS), and rescue analgesic requirements for 24 hours, patient satisfaction, and complications were recorded.
Rescue analgesic requirement was significantly higher in SAC at zero hours (P=0.000), while it was significantly higher in ISB at 12 hours (P=0.02). The VAS scores were comparable at all time points and patient satisfaction at 24 hours was similar. None of the patients had rated satisfaction related to pain relief as poor in any group. Complications like ptosis and motor weakness were seen only with ISB.
Both the techniques provided effective analgesia and comparable patient satisfaction with lesser incidence of complications in the SAC group. ISB provided more effective immediate postoperative pain relief while SAC was more effective in delayed analgesia for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgeries. SAC can be considered a reasonably safe alternative to ISB in patients with contraindications to the latter.
关节镜下肩袖修复手术可能导致显著的术后疼痛。肌间沟阻滞(ISB)是这些手术中一种有效的镇痛技术,但存在膈神经阻滞的风险。肩峰下局部麻醉药浸润是一种保留膈神经的术后镇痛替代技术。我们研究的主要目的是比较ISB与持续肩峰下输注(SAC)在术后镇痛方面的效果。
这项前瞻性随机、干预性平行组试验纳入了60例拟行关节镜下肩袖修复手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I级和II级成年患者(每组30例)。患者被随机分配接受超声引导下的ISB(ISB组:15毫升0.75%罗哌卡因)或持续SAC(SAC组:超声引导下肩峰下注射15毫升0.75%罗哌卡因,并通过外科医生放置在肩峰下的导管以3毫升/小时的速度输注0.5%罗哌卡因)。记录术中血流动力学参数、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、24小时的补救性镇痛需求、患者满意度和并发症情况。
SAC组在术后0小时的补救性镇痛需求显著更高(P = 0.000),而ISB组在术后12小时显著更高(P = 0.02)。所有时间点的VAS评分相当,24小时时的患者满意度相似。在任何一组中,均无患者将与疼痛缓解相关的满意度评为差。仅在ISB组观察到上睑下垂和运动无力等并发症。
两种技术均提供了有效的镇痛效果,患者满意度相当,SAC组的并发症发生率较低。ISB在术后即刻疼痛缓解方面更有效,而SAC在关节镜下肩袖修复手术的延迟镇痛方面更有效。对于有ISB禁忌证的患者,SAC可被视为一种合理安全的替代方法。