Delaunay Laurent, Souron Vincent, Lafosse Laurent, Marret Emmanuel, Toussaint Bruno
Department of Anesthesia, Clinique Générale, Annecy, France.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.11.004.
A continuous infusion of local anesthetic in the subacromial space has been shown to provide superior pain relief compared with placebo. This technique has been considered as an alternative to a continuous interscalene infusion. The aim of our study is to compare these 2 techniques for pain relief after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
In a prospective randomized trial, 30 consecutive patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were included. An interscalene brachial plexus block was performed in all patients with mepivacaine 1.5% 30 mL. Then, 15 patients had an indwelling interscalene catheter inserted immediately after the block via a needle. Fifteen other patients had a subacromial catheter placed at the end of surgery by the surgeon. In both groups, a 2 mg/mL ropivacaine continuous infusion (5 mL/h) with PCA bolus (5 mL/30 min) was maintained for 48 hours. Pain was assessed in PACU and at 24 and 48 hours after surgery, at rest, and during passive motion. Total amount of oral morphine self-administered as rescue analgesia and cumulative 24-hour and 48-hour local anesthetic consumption were noted. Patient satisfaction and side effects were also noted.
Pain during motion in PACU (0 [0 to 60] v 40 [0 to 100] mm) and at 24 hours (10 [0 to 60] v 45 [20 to 100] mm), oral morphine (0 [0 to 6] v 3.5 [0 to 10] morphine capsules), and total amount of local anesthetic at 24 hours (122.5 [120 to 170] v 143 [129 to 250] mg) were lower in the continuous interscalene group. Local anesthetic side effects were less frequent in the continuous subacromial group. Satisfaction was comparable between groups.
After arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, continuous interscalene block provides better analgesia compared with continuous subacromial infusion but with an increased incidence of minor side effects.
与安慰剂相比,在肩峰下间隙持续输注局部麻醉药已显示出更好的疼痛缓解效果。该技术被认为是连续肌间沟输注的一种替代方法。我们研究的目的是比较这两种技术在关节镜下肩袖修复术后的疼痛缓解情况。
在一项前瞻性随机试验中,纳入了30例连续接受肩袖修复的患者。所有患者均使用1.5% 30 mL的甲哌卡因进行肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞。然后,15例患者在阻滞完成后立即通过穿刺针插入一根留置的肌间沟导管。另外15例患者在手术结束时由外科医生放置一根肩峰下导管。两组均维持2 mg/mL罗哌卡因持续输注(5 mL/h)并给予PCA推注(5 mL/30分钟),持续48小时。在麻醉后恢复室(PACU)以及术后24小时和48小时,对静息和被动活动时的疼痛进行评估。记录作为补救镇痛自行服用的口服吗啡总量以及24小时和48小时局部麻醉药的累计用量。还记录了患者满意度和副作用。
在PACU中活动时的疼痛(0 [0至60]对40 [0至100] mm)以及术后24小时(10 [0至60]对45 [20至100] mm)、口服吗啡量(0 [0至6]对3.5 [0至10]粒吗啡胶囊)和24小时局部麻醉药总量(122.5 [120至170]对143 [129至250] mg)在连续肌间沟组中较低。连续肩峰下组局部麻醉药副作用较少见。两组间满意度相当。
关节镜下肩袖修复术后,连续肌间沟阻滞与连续肩峰下输注相比,镇痛效果更好,但轻微副作用发生率增加。