• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚是否准备好迎接人类基因编辑:监管、生物安全与生物安保视角

Is Malaysia Ready for Human Gene Editing: A Regulatory, Biosafety and Biosecurity Perspective.

作者信息

Kalidasan V, Theva Das Kumitaa

机构信息

Infectomics Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kepala Batas, Malaysia.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Mar 11;9:649203. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.649203. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2021.649203
PMID:33777918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7992004/
Abstract

Gene editing platforms have revolutionized the field of genetics with a direct impact on the public health system. Although there are apparent benefits, it is often accompanied by public debates over its uncertainties and risks. In the Malaysian context, modern biotechnology has raised questions about how to best govern gene editing in regulations, biosafety, and biosecurity. Even though standards and guidelines on stem cell and cell-based therapies have been developed, there are no appropriate legal frameworks available for gene editing yet. Nevertheless, biosafety regulations were established to balance promoting biotechnology and protecting against their potential environmental and human health risks. There is also a need to address the potential of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as bioweapons. Numerous frameworks from several international organizations may provide valuable input in formulating documents on gene editing. By establishing comprehensive guidelines, legal policies, and standards to tackle the challenges and risks associated with gene editing, Malaysia can successfully apply this modern technology in this country.

摘要

基因编辑平台彻底改变了遗传学领域,对公共卫生系统产生了直接影响。尽管有明显的益处,但它往往伴随着公众对其不确定性和风险的争论。在马来西亚的背景下,现代生物技术引发了关于如何在监管、生物安全和生物安保方面对基因编辑进行最佳治理的问题。尽管已经制定了关于干细胞和基于细胞的疗法的标准和指南,但目前还没有适用于基因编辑的法律框架。然而,生物安全法规的制定是为了在促进生物技术发展和防范其潜在的环境及人类健康风险之间取得平衡。还需要应对转基因生物作为生物武器的可能性。几个国际组织的众多框架可能为制定基因编辑文件提供有价值的参考。通过建立全面的指南、法律政策和标准来应对与基因编辑相关的挑战和风险,马来西亚能够在本国成功应用这项现代技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66fb/7992004/3891ad695852/fbioe-09-649203-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66fb/7992004/3891ad695852/fbioe-09-649203-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66fb/7992004/3891ad695852/fbioe-09-649203-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Is Malaysia Ready for Human Gene Editing: A Regulatory, Biosafety and Biosecurity Perspective.马来西亚是否准备好迎接人类基因编辑:监管、生物安全与生物安保视角
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Mar 11;9:649203. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.649203. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of Brazilian High- and Maximum-Containment Laboratories Biosafety and Biosecurity Regulations to Legal Frameworks in the United States and Other Countries: Gaps and Opportunities.巴西高防护和最高防护实验室生物安全与生物安保法规与美国及其他国家法律框架的比较:差距与机遇
Appl Biosaf. 2024 Mar 1;29(1):45-56. doi: 10.1089/apb.2023.0005. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
The emerging international regulatory framework for biotechnology.生物技术的新兴国际监管框架。
GM Crops Food. 2012 Jan-Mar;3(1):78-84. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.19363. Epub 2012 Jan 1.
4
Towards Better Governance on Biosafety and Biosecurity: China's Advances and Perspectives in Medical Biotechnology Legislation.迈向生物安全与生物安保的更好治理:中国在医学生物技术立法方面的进展与展望
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jul 4;10:939295. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.939295. eCollection 2022.
5
Biosafety and Biosecurity in Containment: A Regulatory Overview.密闭环境中的生物安全与生物安保:监管概述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jun 30;8:650. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00650. eCollection 2020.
6
Strengthening regulatory capacity for gene drives in Africa: leveraging NEPAD's experience in establishing regulatory systems for medicines and GM crops in Africa.加强非洲基因驱动的监管能力:借鉴新伙伴关系在非洲建立药品和转基因作物监管系统的经验。
BMC Proc. 2018 Jul 19;12(Suppl 8):11. doi: 10.1186/s12919-018-0108-y. eCollection 2018.
7
The African continent should consider a harmonized consultative and collaborative effort towards coordinated policy and regulatory guidelines across the fields of biotechnology.非洲大陆应考虑做出协调一致的努力,进行协商与合作,以制定生物技术领域协调统一的政策和监管准则。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 7;11:1211789. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1211789. eCollection 2023.
8
Biosafety and biosecurity: treading China's synbio tightrope.生物安全与生物安保:中国合成生物学的审慎前行之路
Trends Biotechnol. 2024 Apr;42(4):389-392. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.10.014. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
9
Cutting edges and weaving threads in the gene editing (Я)evolution: reconciling scientific progress with legal, ethical, and social concerns.基因编辑(Я)演进中的前沿与脉络:协调科学进步与法律、伦理和社会关切
J Law Biosci. 2018 Jan 18;5(1):35-83. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsx043. eCollection 2018 May.
10
Assessing agricultural gene editing regulation in Latin America: an analysis of how policy windows and policy entrepreneurs shape agricultural gene editing regulatory regimes.评估拉丁美洲的农业基因编辑监管:政策窗口与政策企业家如何塑造农业基因编辑监管制度的分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 9;11:1209308. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1209308. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing microbiota therapeutics: the role of synthetic biology in engineering microbial communities for precision medicine.推进微生物群疗法:合成生物学在构建用于精准医学的微生物群落中的作用。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Dec 4;12:1511149. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1511149. eCollection 2024.
2
Biomaterials-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery: recent challenges and opportunities in gene therapy.生物材料介导的CRISPR/Cas9递送:基因治疗中的近期挑战与机遇
Front Chem. 2023 Sep 28;11:1259435. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1259435. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Viral Vector Systems for Gene Therapy: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Progress and Biosafety Challenges.用于基因治疗的病毒载体系统:进展与生物安全挑战的综合文献综述
Appl Biosaf. 2020 Mar 1;25(1):7-18. doi: 10.1177/1535676019899502.
2
China set to introduce gene-editing regulation following CRISPR-baby furore.
Nature. 2019 May 20. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01580-1.
3
China delivers verdict on gene editing of babies.中国对基因编辑婴儿作出裁决。
Science. 2020 Jan 10;367(6474):130. doi: 10.1126/science.367.6474.130.
4
Chinese researcher who made CRISPR babies is sentenced to three years in prison.制造基因编辑婴儿的中国研究人员被判处三年监禁。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 3;368:m11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m11.
5
Moving Beyond 'Therapy' and 'Enhancement' in the Ethics of Gene Editing.超越基因编辑伦理中的“治疗”与“增强”
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Oct;28(4):695-707. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000641.
6
Genetic modification in Malaysia and India: current regulatory framework and the special case of non-transformative RNAi in agriculture.马来西亚和印度的基因改造:现行监管框架及农业中非转化性 RNAi 的特殊情况。
Plant Cell Rep. 2019 Dec;38(12):1449-1463. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02446-6. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Regulation of Stem Cell Technology in Malaysia: Current Status and Recommendations.马来西亚的干细胞技术监管:现状与建议。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00111-5. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
Ethics of Human Genome Editing.人类基因组编辑的伦理问题。
Annu Rev Med. 2019 Jan 27;70:289-305. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-112717-094629.
9
#CRISPRbabies: Notes on a Scandal.# “基因编辑婴儿”:一则丑闻笔记。
CRISPR J. 2018 Dec 1;1(6):355-357. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2018.29039.spr. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
10
A new era of gene editing for the treatment of human diseases.用于治疗人类疾病的基因编辑新时代。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019 Jan 27;149:w20021. doi: 10.4414/smw.2019.20021. eCollection 2019 Jan 14.