Suppr超能文献

非洲大陆应考虑做出协调一致的努力,进行协商与合作,以制定生物技术领域协调统一的政策和监管准则。

The African continent should consider a harmonized consultative and collaborative effort towards coordinated policy and regulatory guidelines across the fields of biotechnology.

作者信息

Masehela Tlou Samuel, Barros Eugenia

机构信息

South African National Parks, Scientific Services, Skukuza, South Africa.

EB Biosciences and Consulting, Sandton, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 7;11:1211789. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1211789. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The advances in the field of biotechnology (and bioengineering) over the past decades has allowed the precise development of new products across the agricultural, environmental, and pharmaceutical sectors. This has led to the need to evaluate the relevance and applicability of existing policies and frameworks that regulate the current transgenic technologies. On the African continent, there are delays in the development and implementation of biosafety policies and regulations. Most African countries formulate their policies, regulations, and frameworks by following The Convention on Biological Diversity's (CBD) guidelines. Although the CBD documents are continually evolving, this happens at a slower pace. It is becoming increasingly important for countries to deal swiftly with the advances in biotechnology in a manner that the regulatory complexities, while safeguarding the for human health, the environment, and the economy. For the African countries, some of these are similar, while concerns and perceived risks associated with the adoption and use of the technology are also common. Furthermore, the challenges relating to capacity, knowledge, and skills to address some of the regulatory complexities. In this article we explore the advancement of some African countries in the development and implementation of various biosafety policies and detail the challenges and constraints faced by those countries that are lagging behind. We conclude by outlining identified opportunities for neighbouring and regional countries to assist one another and work in a more organised and coordinated approach towards developing, implementing, and strengthening their respective biosafety policies, regulations, and frameworks.

摘要

在过去几十年里,生物技术(和生物工程)领域的进步使得农业、环境和制药领域能够精确开发新产品。这就需要评估现行转基因技术监管政策和框架的相关性及适用性。在非洲大陆,生物安全政策和法规的制定与实施存在延迟。大多数非洲国家依据《生物多样性公约》(CBD)的指导方针来制定其政策、法规和框架。尽管《生物多样性公约》文件在不断发展,但其发展速度较为缓慢。各国迅速应对生物技术进步并兼顾监管复杂性,同时保障人类健康、环境和经济的做法变得愈发重要。对于非洲国家而言,其中一些问题是相似的,而且与采用和使用该技术相关的担忧及感知风险也很常见。此外,在应对一些监管复杂性方面还存在能力、知识和技能方面的挑战。在本文中,我们探讨了一些非洲国家在制定和实施各种生物安全政策方面取得的进展,并详细阐述了那些落后国家所面临的挑战和制约因素。最后,我们概述了邻国和地区国家相互协助的已确定机会,并以更有组织、更协调的方式致力于制定、实施和加强各自的生物安全政策、法规和框架。

相似文献

3
Regulatory challenges for GM crops in developing economies: the African experience.
Transgenic Res. 2014 Dec;23(6):1049-55. doi: 10.1007/s11248-014-9805-0. Epub 2014 May 13.
5
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Progress and Challenges for Implementation of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa Policy on Biotechnology and Biosafety.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Jul 30;3:109. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00109. eCollection 2015.
7
Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Mar 6;11:130. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00130. eCollection 2020.
8
Case studies on the use of biotechnologies and on biosafety provisions in four African countries.
J Biotechnol. 2011 Dec 20;156(4):370-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.036. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
10
Towards Better Governance on Biosafety and Biosecurity: China's Advances and Perspectives in Medical Biotechnology Legislation.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jul 4;10:939295. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.939295. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Consumer Perceptions and Safety of Genetically Modified Foods in Africa: A Comprehensive Review.
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jun 3;13(6):e4730. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4730. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Rethinking progress: harmonizing the discourse on genetically modified crops.
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Mar 21;16:1547928. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1547928. eCollection 2025.
3
Africa and zero hunger agenda: genome editing policy landscape, challenges and opportunities.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Mar 12;13:1526851. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1526851. eCollection 2025.
4
Navigating biosafety regulatory frameworks for genetic engineering in Africa: a focus on genome editing and gene drive technologies.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Oct 24;12:1483279. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1483279. eCollection 2024.
5
The Adoption of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: the Public's Current Perception, the Regulatory Obstacles, and Ethical Challenges.
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2345401. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
6
Making genome editing a success story in Africa.
Nat Biotechnol. 2024 Apr;42(4):551-554. doi: 10.1038/s41587-024-02187-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Usefulness of Seed Systems for Reviving Smallholder Agriculture: a South African Perspective.
Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 2021 Jun 25;21(2):17581-17603. doi: 10.18697/ajfand.97.19480.
2
Governing biotechnology to provide safety and security and address ethical, legal, and social implications.
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 11;13:1052371. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1052371. eCollection 2022.
3
Genome editing around the globe: An update on policies and perceptions.
Plant Physiol. 2022 Oct 27;190(3):1579-1587. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac359.
4
Genome Editing for Sustainable Agriculture in Africa.
Front Genome Ed. 2022 May 12;4:876697. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2022.876697. eCollection 2022.
5
CRISPR/Cas9 technology for improving agronomic traits and future prospective in agriculture.
Planta. 2021 Sep 8;254(4):68. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03716-y.
6
Expert opinions on the regulation of plant genome editing.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2021 Jun;19(6):1104-1109. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13597. Epub 2021 May 11.
8
Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom - A Review.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 24;12:630396. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.630396. eCollection 2021.
9
Biosafety Regulatory Reviews and Leeway to Operate: Case Studies From Sub-Sahara Africa.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Mar 6;11:130. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00130. eCollection 2020.
10
The human health benefits from GM crops.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2020 Apr;18(4):887-888. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13261. Epub 2019 Oct 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验