Suppr超能文献

肘部体格检查教育视频的准确性和质量:从最早年份到2018年10月的检索

Accuracy and Quality of Educational Videos for Elbow Physical Examination: A Search from the Earliest Year until October 2018.

作者信息

Zwerus Elisa L, Molenaars Rik J, van den Bekerom Michel P J, The Bertram, Eygendaal Denise

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, ocation AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Jan;9(1):93-101. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.47221.2310.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical students and residents rely increasingly on web-based education. Online videos provide unique opportunities to share knowledge. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy and quality of instructional videos on the physical examination of the elbow and identify factors influencing educational usefulness.

METHODS

On October 7, 2018, a search on YouTube, VuMedi, Orthobullets, and G9MD was performed. Videos were rated for accuracy and quality by two independent authors using a modified version of a validated scoring system for the nervous and cardiopulmonary system. Inter-rater reliability was analysed.

RESULTS

The 126 included videos were uploaded between June 2007 and February 2018. Twenty-three videos were indicated as useful for educational purposes. Accuracy, quality and overall scores were significantly higher for videos from specialized platforms (VuMedi, Orthobullets, G6MD) compared to YouTube. Video accuracy and quality varied widely and were not correlated. Number of days online, views, and likes showed no or weak correlation with accuracy and quality. For the overall score, our assessment tool showed excellent inter-rater reliability.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable variation in accuracy and quality of currently available online videos on the physical examination of the elbow. We identified 23 educationally useful videos and provided an assessment method for the quality of educational videos. In educational settings, this method may help students to assess video reliability and aid educators in the development of high-quality instructional online content.

摘要

背景

医学生和住院医师越来越依赖基于网络的教育。在线视频为知识共享提供了独特的机会。本研究的目的是调查关于肘部体格检查的教学视频的准确性和质量,并确定影响教育实用性的因素。

方法

2018年10月7日,在YouTube、VuMedi、Orthobullets和G9MD上进行了搜索。两位独立作者使用经过验证的神经系统和心肺系统评分系统的修改版对视频的准确性和质量进行评分。分析了评分者间的可靠性。

结果

纳入的126个视频于2007年6月至2018年2月期间上传。23个视频被认为对教育目的有用。与YouTube相比,来自专业平台(VuMedi、Orthobullets、G6MD)的视频的准确性、质量和总体得分显著更高。视频的准确性和质量差异很大,且不相关。在线天数、观看次数和点赞数与准确性和质量无相关性或相关性较弱。对于总体得分,我们的评估工具显示出优秀的评分者间可靠性。

结论

目前可用的关于肘部体格检查的在线视频在准确性和质量上存在很大差异。我们确定了23个具有教育用途的视频,并提供了一种教育视频质量的评估方法。在教育环境中,这种方法可能有助于学生评估视频的可靠性,并帮助教育工作者开发高质量的在线教学内容。

相似文献

8
YouTube as a Potential Training Resource for Laparoscopic Fundoplication.YouTube作为腹腔镜胃底折叠术的潜在培训资源
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):1066-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
10
Neurological Examination: An Evaluation of Video-Based Learning.神经学检查:基于视频学习的评估
Cureus. 2024 Jan 8;16(1):e51866. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51866. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
YouTube as a learning tool for four shoulder tests.YouTube作为四种肩部测试的学习工具。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Oct 30;20:e70. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000804.
8
Learning electrocardiogram on YouTube: how useful is it?在YouTube上学习心电图:它有多有用?
J Electrocardiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;47(1):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
10
How useful is YouTube in learning heart anatomy?在学习心脏解剖学方面,YouTube 有多有用?
Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;7(1):12-8. doi: 10.1002/ase.1361. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验