• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Accuracy and Quality of Educational Videos for Elbow Physical Examination: A Search from the Earliest Year until October 2018.肘部体格检查教育视频的准确性和质量:从最早年份到2018年10月的检索
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Jan;9(1):93-101. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.47221.2310.
2
The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent.基于开放获取视频的肩部体格检查骨科教学内容质量参差不齐。
HSS J. 2016 Oct;12(3):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s11420-016-9508-6. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
3
Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos shared on Open access video sharing platform YouTube.评估在开放获取视频分享平台 YouTube 上分享的心肺复苏术视频的可靠性、实用性和信息质量。
Australas Emerg Care. 2020 Sep;23(3):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Assessment of YouTube as an Educational Tool in Teaching Key Indicator Cases in Otolaryngology During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Neck Dissection.评估 YouTube 在 COVID-19 大流行期间及之后的耳鼻喉科关键指标病例教学中的教育工具价值:颈部解剖。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Jan-Feb;78(1):214-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.YouTube 作为脑卒中患者经颅磁刺激的信息来源:一项质量、可靠性和准确性分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105309. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
6
Surgical videos on the internet: Is this a reliable pedagogical tool in residency training?互联网上的手术视频:这是住院医师培训中可靠的教学工具吗?
SICOT J. 2022;8:39. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2022039. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
7
Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis.YouTube 视频中膝关节穿刺术的教学质量。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Oct;19(7):373-6. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3182a69fb2.
8
YouTube as a Potential Training Resource for Laparoscopic Fundoplication.YouTube作为腹腔镜胃底折叠术的潜在培训资源
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):1066-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
9
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
10
Neurological Examination: An Evaluation of Video-Based Learning.神经学检查:基于视频学习的评估
Cureus. 2024 Jan 8;16(1):e51866. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51866. eCollection 2024 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Can educational video resources improve learning when used to augment traditional teaching of clinical examination? A randomized control trial of novice medical students.利用教育视频资源来增强传统临床检查教学,是否能提高学习效果?一项针对新手医学生的随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03974-8.
2
Educational value assessment of YouTube surgical videos of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and trans-obturator vaginal tape (TOT).无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O)和经闭孔阴道吊带术(TOT)的YouTube手术视频的教育价值评估
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Jan;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-814.

本文引用的文献

1
YouTube as a learning tool for four shoulder tests.YouTube作为四种肩部测试的学习工具。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Oct 30;20:e70. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000804.
2
LAP-VEGaS Practice Guidelines for Reporting of Educational Videos in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Joint Trainers and Trainees Consensus Statement.腹腔镜手术教育视频报告规范(LAP-VEGaS):联合培训师和学员共识声明。
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):920-926. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002725.
3
Physical examination of the elbow, what is the evidence? A systematic literature review.肘部体格检查的证据有哪些?一项系统文献回顾。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;52(19):1253-1260. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096712. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent.基于开放获取视频的肩部体格检查骨科教学内容质量参差不齐。
HSS J. 2016 Oct;12(3):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s11420-016-9508-6. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Direct ophthalmoscopy on YouTube: analysis of instructional YouTube videos' content and approach to visualization.YouTube 上的直接检眼镜检查:对 YouTube 教学视频内容及可视化方法的分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 16;10:1535-41. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S111648. eCollection 2016.
6
Understanding pharmacokinetics: are YouTube videos a useful learning resource?了解药物动力学:YouTube视频是有用的学习资源吗?
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Jul;18(13):1957-67.
7
Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems.关于心血管和呼吸系统体格检查的YouTube视频的教育价值评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 13;15(11):e241. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2728.
8
Learning electrocardiogram on YouTube: how useful is it?在YouTube上学习心电图:它有多有用?
J Electrocardiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;47(1):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
9
Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research.统计专栏:医学研究中相关系数合理应用指南
Malawi Med J. 2012 Sep;24(3):69-71.
10
How useful is YouTube in learning heart anatomy?在学习心脏解剖学方面,YouTube 有多有用?
Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;7(1):12-8. doi: 10.1002/ase.1361. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

肘部体格检查教育视频的准确性和质量:从最早年份到2018年10月的检索

Accuracy and Quality of Educational Videos for Elbow Physical Examination: A Search from the Earliest Year until October 2018.

作者信息

Zwerus Elisa L, Molenaars Rik J, van den Bekerom Michel P J, The Bertram, Eygendaal Denise

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, ocation AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Jan;9(1):93-101. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.47221.2310.

DOI:10.22038/abjs.2020.47221.2310
PMID:33778121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7957115/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical students and residents rely increasingly on web-based education. Online videos provide unique opportunities to share knowledge. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy and quality of instructional videos on the physical examination of the elbow and identify factors influencing educational usefulness.

METHODS

On October 7, 2018, a search on YouTube, VuMedi, Orthobullets, and G9MD was performed. Videos were rated for accuracy and quality by two independent authors using a modified version of a validated scoring system for the nervous and cardiopulmonary system. Inter-rater reliability was analysed.

RESULTS

The 126 included videos were uploaded between June 2007 and February 2018. Twenty-three videos were indicated as useful for educational purposes. Accuracy, quality and overall scores were significantly higher for videos from specialized platforms (VuMedi, Orthobullets, G6MD) compared to YouTube. Video accuracy and quality varied widely and were not correlated. Number of days online, views, and likes showed no or weak correlation with accuracy and quality. For the overall score, our assessment tool showed excellent inter-rater reliability.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable variation in accuracy and quality of currently available online videos on the physical examination of the elbow. We identified 23 educationally useful videos and provided an assessment method for the quality of educational videos. In educational settings, this method may help students to assess video reliability and aid educators in the development of high-quality instructional online content.

摘要

背景

医学生和住院医师越来越依赖基于网络的教育。在线视频为知识共享提供了独特的机会。本研究的目的是调查关于肘部体格检查的教学视频的准确性和质量,并确定影响教育实用性的因素。

方法

2018年10月7日,在YouTube、VuMedi、Orthobullets和G9MD上进行了搜索。两位独立作者使用经过验证的神经系统和心肺系统评分系统的修改版对视频的准确性和质量进行评分。分析了评分者间的可靠性。

结果

纳入的126个视频于2007年6月至2018年2月期间上传。23个视频被认为对教育目的有用。与YouTube相比,来自专业平台(VuMedi、Orthobullets、G6MD)的视频的准确性、质量和总体得分显著更高。视频的准确性和质量差异很大,且不相关。在线天数、观看次数和点赞数与准确性和质量无相关性或相关性较弱。对于总体得分,我们的评估工具显示出优秀的评分者间可靠性。

结论

目前可用的关于肘部体格检查的在线视频在准确性和质量上存在很大差异。我们确定了23个具有教育用途的视频,并提供了一种教育视频质量的评估方法。在教育环境中,这种方法可能有助于学生评估视频的可靠性,并帮助教育工作者开发高质量的在线教学内容。