• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单切口腹腔镜腹部手术:155例不同手术的病例系列,一项观察性队列研究。

Single incision laparoscopic abdominal surgeries: case series of 155 various procedures, an observational cohort study.

作者信息

Özkurt Enver, Barbaros Umut, Aksakal Nihat, Doğan Selim, Bozbora Alp

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Dana Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.

Department of General Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Surg. 2020 Dec 29;36(4):353-358. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2020.4795. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2020.4795
PMID:33778394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7963301/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Over the last decade, surgeons have started to think of the ways in which to further reduce the trauma of surgery and improve cosmesis. Consequently, many surgeons have yielded to single incision laparoscopic surgeries (SILS) in order to maximize operative and postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to highlight the feasibility and challenges of different procedures by presenting our data about different fields of abdominal SILS practices with long term follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed an observational cohort of 155 patients who underwent surgery for different indications using the SILS technique.

RESULTS

Of the 155 SILS procedures: 75 (48.4%) were cholecystectomies; 22 (14.2%) were splenectomies; 17 (11%) were hernia repairs; 11 (7.1%) were appendectomies; 8 (5.2%) were partial colon resections; 8 (5.2%) were adrenalectomies; 6 (3.8%) were distal pancreatectomy & splenectomies; 3 (1.9%) were subtotal gastrectomies; 3 (1.9%) were partial liver resections; and 2 (1.3%) were Nissen fundoplications. Ten (6.5%) early and 3 (1.9%) late postoperative complications were detected. No mortality or late morbidity (> 30 days) was detected due to SILS procedures.

CONCLUSION

SILS is a feasible technique in experienced hands for specific procedures. Meticulous patient selection is also important for good cosmetic results and outcomes.

摘要

目的

在过去十年中,外科医生开始思考如何进一步减少手术创伤并改善美容效果。因此,许多外科医生采用了单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS),以实现最佳的手术和术后效果。本研究旨在通过展示我们在腹部SILS不同领域的长期随访数据,突出不同手术方法的可行性和挑战。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了155例因不同适应证接受SILS技术手术的患者的观察队列。

结果

在155例SILS手术中:75例(48.4%)为胆囊切除术;22例(14.2%)为脾切除术;17例(11%)为疝修补术;11例(7.1%)为阑尾切除术;8例(5.2%)为部分结肠切除术;8例(5.2%)为肾上腺切除术;6例(3.8%)为远端胰腺切除术及脾切除术;3例(1.9%)为胃大部切除术;3例(1.9%)为部分肝切除术;2例(1.3%)为nissen胃底折叠术。检测到10例(6.5%)早期和3例(1.9%)晚期术后并发症。未检测到因SILS手术导致的死亡或晚期发病率(>30天)。

结论

对于特定手术,SILS在经验丰富的医生手中是一种可行的技术。精心选择患者对于获得良好的美容效果和手术结果也很重要。

相似文献

1
Single incision laparoscopic abdominal surgeries: case series of 155 various procedures, an observational cohort study.单切口腹腔镜腹部手术:155例不同手术的病例系列,一项观察性队列研究。
Turk J Surg. 2020 Dec 29;36(4):353-358. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2020.4795. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations.单切口腹腔镜手术的早期经验:消除腹部手术疤痕
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Sep;44(9):1741-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.12.024.
3
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单机构的结局分析
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):626-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3219-6. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy with conventional instruments: preliminary experience in consecutive patients and comparison to standard multiple-incision laparoscopic splenectomy.使用传统器械的单孔腹腔镜脾切除术:连续患者的初步经验及与标准多孔腹腔镜脾切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Nov;24(11):799-803. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0213.
5
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery as a teaching procedure: a single-center experience of more than 2100 procedures.单孔腹腔镜手术作为一种教学术式:单中心超2100例手术的经验
Surg Today. 2016 Nov;46(11):1318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1315-7. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
Laparoscopic single port surgery in children using Triport: our early experience.使用Triport进行儿童腹腔镜单孔手术:我们的早期经验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2011 Sep;27(9):985-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-011-2892-6. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
7
Single Port Laparoscopic Total and Subtotal Colectomies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a District General Hospital.地区综合医院单孔腹腔镜全结肠切除术和次全结肠切除术治疗炎症性肠病
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Nov;29(11):1431-1435. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0259. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
Single incision laparoscopic hepatectomy: Advances in laparoscopic liver surgery.单切口腹腔镜肝切除术:腹腔镜肝脏手术的进展
J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Jan;10(1):14-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.124454.
9
10-Year Experience with 1700 Single-Incision Laparoscopies.1700例单孔腹腔镜手术的10年经验
Surg Technol Int. 2019 Nov 10;35:71-83.
10
The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:前瞻性随机研究
J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Dec;85(6):275-82. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.275. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right colectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jul;55:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 16.
2
Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Prospective Evidence.单切口与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病的短期疗效比较:随机和前瞻性证据的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Nov;21(11):1931-1945. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3520-0. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis.单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的身体意象和美容效果的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1141-1159. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10574. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单切口腹腔镜手术与标准腹腔镜手术用于结直肠手术的系统评价和Meta分析
Am J Surg. 2017 Jul;214(1):127-140. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单切口与传统三切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;10(3):196-206. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12238.
6
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty.单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与传统腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的比较
Surg Innov. 2017 Apr;24(2):171-182. doi: 10.1177/1553350617690308. Epub 2017 Feb 5.
7
Is There a Cosmetic Advantage to Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgical Techniques Over Standard Laparoscopic Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.与标准腹腔镜手术相比,单切口腹腔镜手术技术是否具有美容优势?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Jun;26(3):177-82. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000261.
8
Comparison of single port and three port laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: Clinical comparative study.免疫性血小板减少性紫癜患者单孔与三孔腹腔镜脾切除术的比较:临床对照研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jul-Sep;11(3):172-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.159853.
9
Single port laparoscopy in gastroenterology and hepatology: a fine step forward.胃肠病学和肝病学中的单孔腹腔镜检查:向前迈出的稳健一步。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15599-607. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15599.
10
Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomised comparison of clinical results of 140 cases.单孔经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术:140例临床结果的前瞻性随机对照研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2012 Jul;8(3):74-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.97586.